Erskine's (1991) review and critique of Berne's exposition of transference is largely supported; differences that are asserted by Erskine regarding drive theory and TA and Kohut's transference distinctions are disputed. Comments on Erskine's model of the function of ego states, their interrelationships and structural embeddedness, and contact with the here-and-now follow. Supportive comments on the articles of Clark (1991) and Shmukler (1991) conclude the critique.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerneE. (1964). Games people play. New York: Grove Press.
2.
ClarkB. D. (1991). Empathic transactions in the deconfusion of Child ego states. Transactional Analysis Journal, 21, 92–98.
3.
ErskineR. G. (1991). Transference and transactions: Critique from an intrapsychic and integrative perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 21, 63–76.
4.
GouldingR. L., & GouldingM. M. (1979). Changing lives through redecision therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
5.
McNeelJ. (1977). The seven components of redecision therapy. TA after Eric Berne (pp. 425–441). New York: Harper & Row.
6.
ShmuklerD. (1991). Transference and transactions: Perspectives from developmental theory, object relations, and transformational processes. Transactional Analysis Journal, 21, 127–135.
