The author urges an end to denial and apathy on the part of psychotherapists regarding their role in preventing nuclear disaster and presents a vision of an international network of psychotherapists and other professionals joining together in a worldwide effort to teach the application of psychological insights and problem solving tools to the greatest political issue of our time. The view that therapists help to preserve the worst of the social status quo if they fail to work for social change is cited, and positive organizational and individual actions are presented.
GarciaF. (1984). Competition: A cultural script issue in the USA. Transactional Analysis Journal, 14, 44–47.
4.
GoldmanD. & GreenbergW.M. (1982). Preparing for nuclear war: The psychological effects. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52 (4), 580–81.
5.
HalleckS.L. (1974, February). Psychotherapy and social change. Lecture at the Southeast Institute, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
6.
KeenS. (1983). The passionate life. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
7.
KeyesK.Jr. (1981). The hundredth monkey. St. Mary, KY: Vision Books.
8.
KrasnerL. (1962). The therapist as a social reinforcement machine. In StruppH.H. & LuborskyL., (eds.), Research in psychotherapy, Vol. II, (pp. 61–94). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
MackJ.E. (1982). The perception of US-Soviet intentions and other psychological dimensions of the nuclear arms race. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52 (4), 590–99.
10.
MacyJ. (1984). Moving through nuclear despair and apathy. The Script, 74 (5), 1–2.
11.
SteinerC. (1984, June). Cooperation in new and varied contexts. Presentation at ITAA Summer Conference, Villars, Switzerland.
