Invites closer study of the field of education and some of its major components as a means of enriching the educational process of transactional analysts. It defines the composition of, and necessity for, a TA curriculum instruction, discusses the efficacy of the “training model” and provides information on the relevance of learning objectives. Also presented is one model of developing T.A. learning objectives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BermanL.M., New priorities in the curriculum. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., 1968.
2.
BiehlerR.F., Psychology applied to teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1971.
3.
The taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay Publishing Co., 1956.
4.
ColeW.E., & CoxR.L.Social foundations of education. New York: American Book Company, 1968, 104.
5.
ErskineR.G., “Supervision of psychotherapy: Models for professional development”, Transactional Analysis Journal, 1982, 12, 314–321.
6.
FraenkelJ.R., Helping students think and value. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1973.
7.
GreenT.F., A topology of the teaching concept. Studies in philosophy and education. 3, 284–319, Winter 1964–65.
8.
HymanR.T.Ways of teaching. Philadelphia: J.B Lippincott Company, 1970.
9.
HymanR.T.Approaches in curriculum. Edgewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.1973.
