Abstract
Elaborates the point of view that strokes tailored to the specific needs of the individual toward whom they are directed enhances the potency of the strokes. Just as individuals differ in the types of strokes they are most responsive to, the kinds of strokes an individual needs vary with changes in circumstances. Although strokes may be directed to a particular ego state, it is the Child who is the real recipient of all strokes. When a specific stroke need is answered with an unspecific stroke, the receiver may experience an invitation to feel “bad.” Possible options for the receiver in such instances are considered. Authentic needs are contrasted with false specific needs arising from rackets. Suggestions for modification of outmoded and non-useful patterns of specific stroke needs are included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.