Analysis of intimacy transactions revealed two distinct operations: a high level of Child (2) to Child contact, and the active influence of the Parent (P2). Concludes that these are necessary elements for intimacy. Distinguishes between games, play, and intimacy in terms of ego states involved. Contrasts intimacy with love, which is considered to be “the readiness and willingness to be intimate,” and hence, not a time structure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerneE.Games people play. New York: Grove Press, Inc., 1964, 18.
2.
BerneE.Sex in human loving. New York: Pocket Books, 1970, 115.
3.
BoydH.Second-order structure in the child. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1978, 8 (1), 5–10.
4.
Cowles-BoydL., & BoydH.Play as a time structure. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1980, 10 (1), 6.
5.
FreudS.An outline of psychoanalysis. New York: Norton, 1949.
6.
HarlowH.Learning to love. New York: Jason Aronson, 1974.
