TA is a widely used yet little understood organizational tool for change. The data base for its application to organizations is almost nonexistent. Field research reported here attempts to improve employee perception of supervisory behavior through increased listening, approachability, team work, and information flow. A TA program was enacted to achieve these goals. Significant change was reported at the .004 level.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbanoC.Transactional analysis on the job, part 1: How we're programmed. Supervisorv Management, 1974a, 19, 3–15.
2.
AlbanoC.Transactional Analysis on the job, part 2: Hidden levels of communication. Supervisory Management, 1974b, 19, 13–27.
3.
AlbanoC.Transactional analysis on the job, part 2: Styles of supervision. Supervisory Management, 1974c, 19, 15–20.
4.
AlbanoC.Transactional analysis on the job, part 4; Motivation and counseling. Supervisory Management, 1974d, 19, 3–8.
5.
BerneE.The structure and dynamics of organizations and groups. New York: Grove, 1963.
6.
BerneE.Games people play. New York: Grove, 1964.
7.
BrownT.H.Change of self-concept with an intact group by a transactional analysis approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Southern Illinois University, 1973.
8.
ClaryT.Transactional analysis: An innovative technique in management training and organizational development. Training and Development Journal, 1972, 26, 14–19.
9.
ColemanP.Transactional analysis and successful management. Elk Grove, Illinois: Advanced Systems, 1974.
10.
ConcannonJ.TA and management problems. Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 1967, 6, 65.
11.
HainT.Organizational change patterns. Flint, Michigan: General Motors Institute, 1972.
12.
HarrisT.I'm OK—You're OK. New York: Avon, 1969.
13.
HarperM.Banking on people and TA. In Everybody wins: Transactional analysis applied to organizations, by JongewardD., Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
14.
HuseE.Organizational development and change. St. Paul, Minnesota: West, 1975.
KirkR.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavior sciences. Belmont, California: Brooke/Cole, 1968.
17.
LuchsingerV., & LuchsingerL.Transactional analysis for managers, or how to be more OK with OK organizations. MSU Business Topics, 1974, 22, 5–12.
18.
NykodymN.Transactional analysis: A strategy for the improvement of organizational climate, 5th Annual Midwest TA Conferences, Cincinnati, 1977.
19.
OttemannR. & LuthansF.An experimental analysis of the effectiveness of an organizational behavior modification program in industry. In Proceedings of Academy of Management thirty-fifth annual meeting by BedianA.ArmenakisA.HolleyW.FieldH.New Orleans, August, 1975.
20.
RandallL.Red, white and blue TA at 600 mph. In Everbody wins: Transactional analysis applied to organizations, by JongewardD. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
21.
RushH., & McGrathP., Transactional analysis moves into corporate training. The Conference Board Record, 1973, 10, 42–43.
22.
SinclairS.TA improves customer contacts. In Everybody wins: Transactional analysis applied to organizations, by JongewardD., Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
23.
TaylorJ., & BowersD.The survey of organizations: A machine-scored standardized questionnaire instrument. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, 1972.
24.
TianoK.Transactional analysis applied to mountain bell. In Everybody Wins: Transactional Analysis Applied to Organizations, by JongewardD. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
25.
ThomsonG.The identification of ego states. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1972, 2, 46–61.
26.
WestH.TA for the aged. Unpublished Manuscript, 1975.
