In this response to de Graaf and Rosseau (2015), the author appreciates the way they identify and discuss conflict avoidance within the transactional analysis community and their appeal for greater authenticity. She likens TA voluntary associations to the Quakers and identifies a similar culture or frame of reference, which she then examines in terms of spiral dynamics (Graves, 2005). A way of working toward reconciliation using Kraybill’s (1988) cycle of reconciliation is offered.
AngyalA. (1972). Foundation for a science of personality. New York, NY: Viking Press. (Original work published 1941)
2.
BeckD. E.CowanC. C. (1996). Spiral dynamics: Mastering values leadership and change. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
3.
BerneE. (1982). What do you say after you say hello? The psychology of human destiny. London, England: Corgi Books. (Original work published 1972)
4.
de GraafA.RosseauM. (2015). Transactional analysis and conflict management: Embracing conflict as an opportunity for growth and learning. Transactional Analysis Journal, 45, 250-259.
5.
EnglishF. (1979). Talk by Fanita English on receiving the Eric Berne memorial scientific award for the concept of rackets as substitute feelings. Transactional Analysis Journal, 9, 90–97.
6.
FanonF. (1967). Black skins, white masks (MarckmannC. L., Trans.). New York, NY: Grove Press. (Original work published 1952 in French)
7.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (RamosM., Trans.). New York: Herder and Herder. (Original work published 1968 in Portuguese)
8.
GravesC. W. (2005). The never ending quest: Dr. Clare Graves explores human nature (CowanC.TodorovicN., Eds.). Santa Barbara, CA: ECLET Publishing.
