Taking a two-person (Stark, 1999) and political approach to psychotherapy, the authors discuss the potential for multiple games occurring contemporaneously in the therapeutic dyad and illustrate the psychodynamics of such games by referencing ego state relational units (Little, 2006). The article describes how an overly simplistic approach to supporting autonomy can lead to an oppressive use of theory and the potential colonization of clients. Clinical examples and the idea of dilemma transactions are offered to demonstrate therapeutic options for working with multiple contemporaneous games.
AllenJ. R.AllenB. A. (2005). Concepts of transference: A critique, a typology, an alternative hypothesis, and some proposals. In AllenJ. R.AllenB. A., Therapeutic journey: Practice and life (pp. 325–341). Oakland, CA: TA Press. (Original work published 1991)
2.
BerneE. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. New York, NY: Grove Press.
3.
BerneE. (1964). Games people play: The psychology of human relationships. New York, NY: Grove Press.
4.
BerneE. (1972). What do you say after you say hello? The psychology of human destiny. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
5.
DavidsM. F. (2006). Internal racism, anxiety and the world outside: Islamophobia post-9/11. Organisational and Social Dynamics, 6, 63–85.
6.
ErskineR. (1997). Shame and self-righteousness: Transactional analysis perspectives. In ErskineR. G., Theories and methods of an integrative transactional analysis: A volume of selected articles (pp. 46–67). San Francisco, CA: TA Press. (Original work published 1994)
7.
FanonF. (1967). Black skin, white masks (MarkmannC. L., Trans.). New York, NY: Grove Press. (Original work published in French in 1952)
8.
HargadenH.SillsC. (2002). Transactional analysis: A relational perspective. Hove, England: Brunner-Routledge.
LittleR. (2006). Ego state relational units and resistance to change. Transactional Analysis Journal, 36, 7–19.
11.
MasseyR. (1986). Paradox, double binding, and counterparadox: A transactional analysis perspective (a response to Reese Price). Transactional Analysis Journal, 16, 24–46.
12.
MasseyR. (2007). Reexamining social psychiatry as a foundational framework for transactional analysis: Considering a social-psychological perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 37, 51–79.
13.
MoisoC. (1985). Ego states and transference. Transactional Analysis Journal, 15, 194–201.
14.
NovellinoM. (2003). On closer analysis: A psychodynamic revision of the rules of communication within the framework of transactional psychoanalysis. In SillsC.HargadenH. (Eds.), Ego states (Vol. 1 of Key concepts in transactional analysis: Contemporary views) (pp. 149–168). London, England: Worth Publishing.
15.
SchiffJ. L.(with SchiffA.MellorK.SchiffE.SchiffS.RichmanD.FishmanJ.WolzL.FishmanC.MombD.). (1975). Cathexis reader: Transactional analysis treatment of psychosis. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
16.
ShawG. B. (2004). Man and superman (Maxims for revolutionists). London, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1903)
17.
StarkM. (1999). Modes of therapeutic action. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
18.
SteinerC.WyckoffH.GoldstineD.LariviereP.SchwebelR.MarcusJ.SchwebelR., Members of the Radical Psychiatry Center. (1975). Readings in radical psychiatry. New York, NY: Grove Press.
