This article focuses on how games unfold as transferential dramas in the consulting room theater. The author explores how the therapist’s countertransference can become an avenue for understanding the client’s unspoken communication. Eric Berne’s idea that games can be played in three degrees of intensity is suggested as a framework for thinking about and using countertransference. The author proposes that resolution of a game often requires an emotional shift within the therapist.
AronL. (2003). The paradoxical place of enactment in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(5), 623–631.
2.
BerneE. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. New York, NY: Grove Press.
3.
BerneE. (1972). What do you say after you say hello? The psychology of human destiny. New York, NY: Grove Press.
4.
BerneE. (1996). Games people play: The psychology of human relationships. New York, NY: Ballantine Books. (Original work published 1964)
5.
BionW. R. (1963). Elements of psychoanalysis. London, England: Karnac Books.
6.
BoeskyD. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 59, 550–584.
7.
BrittonR. (2007, 27 July). From analysis of children’s play to enactment in adult psychoanalysis. Panel paper presented at the International Psychoanalytical Association Conference, Berlin, Germany.
8.
BucciW. (2001). Pathways of emotional communication. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 21, 40–70.
9.
CornellW. F. (2011). Fostering the freedom for play, imagination and uncertainty. In FowlieH.SillsC. (Eds.), Relational transactional analysis: Principles in practice (pp. 337–343). London, England: Karnac Books.
10.
CornellW. F.HargadenH. (Eds.). (2005). From transactions to relations: The emergence of a relational tradition in transactional analysis. Chadlington, England: Haddon Press.
11.
EllmanS. (1998). Enactment, transference and analytic trust. In EllmanS.MoskowitzM. (Eds.), Enactment: Toward a new approach to the therapeutic relationship (pp. 183–203). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
HargadenH.SillsC. (2002). Transactional analysis: A relational perspective. Hove, England: Brunner-Routledge.
14.
HineJ. (1990). The bilateral and ongoing nature of games. Transactional Analysis Journal, 20, 28–39.
15.
HuntJ. (2011). Exploring the relational meaning of formula G in supervision and self-supervision. In FowlieH.SillsC. (Eds.), Relational transactional analysis: Principles in practice (pp. 287–303). London, England: Karnac Books.
16.
JacobsT. (1986). On countertransference enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 34, 289–307.
17.
KleinM. (1927). Criminal tendencies in normal children. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 7(2), 177–192.
18.
MarodaK. (1998). Enactment: When the patient’s and analyst’s pasts converge. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15(4), 517–535.
19.
McLaughlinJ. (1987). The play of transference: Some reflection on enactment in the therapeutic situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 35, 557–582.
20.
McLaughlinJ. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, 595–614.
21.
NovellinoM. (1984). Self-analysis of countertransference in integrative transactional analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 14, 63–67.
22.
OgdenT. (2004). Subjects of analysis. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. (Original work published 1994)
23.
RenikO. (1998). The role of countertransference enactment in a successful clinical psychoanalysis. In EllmanS.MoskowitzM. (Eds.), Enactment: Toward a new approach to the therapeutic relationship (pp. 111–128). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
24.
SearlesH. F. (2004). My work with borderline patients. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. (Original work published 1986)
25.
ShadboltC. (2012). The place of failure and rupture in psychotherapy. Transactional Analysis Journal, 42, 5–16.
26.
SlavinJ. (2010). Becoming an individual: Technically subversive thoughts on the role of the analyst’s influence. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 20, 308–324.
27.
SothM. (2013). We are all relational, but are some more relational than others?: Completing the paradigm shift toward relationality. Transactional Analysis Journal, 43, 122–137.
28.
SternD. B. (2010). Partners in thought: Working with unformulated experience, dissociation and enactment. London, England: Routledge.
29.
WoodsK. (1996). Projective identification and game analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 26, 228–231.
30.
WoodsK. (2000). The defensive function of the game scenario. Transactional Analysis Journal, 30, 94–97.
31.
WoodsK. (2002). Primary and secondary gains from games. Transactional Analysis Journal, 32, 190–192.
