This article explores the synergy between cognitive apprenticeship and transactional analysis, specifically in relation to teaching, training, and supervision. The learning science of cognitive apprenticeship offers a relational approach through its use of the metaphor of master and novice, which is consistent with transactional analysis theory and practice. The author discusses cognitive apprenticeship as a pedagogical approach that has been central in transactional analysis training, supervision, fields of application, and practice from the beginning.
BarrowG. (2011). Educator as cultivator. Transactional Analysis Journal, 41, 308–314.
3.
BerneE. (1963). The structure and dynamics of organizations and groups. New York, NY: Grove Press.
4.
CassoniE. (2007). Parallel process in supervision and therapy. An opportunity for reciprocity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 37, 130–139.
5.
CollinsA. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In SawyerK. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 47–60). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DennenV. P. (2004). Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. In JonassenD. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 813–828). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
GoodyearP. (2000). Environments for lifelong learning: Ergonomics, architecture and educational design. In SpectorJ. M.AndersonT. M. (Eds.), Integrated and holistc perspectives on learning, instruction and technology (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
8.
HargadenH.SillsC. (2008). Acceptance speech on receiving the 2007 Eric Berne memorial award. Transactional Analysis Journal, 38, 8–16.
9.
HayJ. (2007). Reflective practice and supervision for coaches. Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill International (UK).
10.
KarpfS.KarpfE. (Writers) DanielsM. (Director) (1975, 15 February). Barbary house. In Kung fu [Television series, Episode 59]. Los Angeles, CA: Warner Brothers.
11.
KnowlesM. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult learning: From pedagogy to andragogy (Rev). New York, NY: Cambridge Adult Education Company.
KoperR. (2005). An introduction to learning design. In KoperR.TattersallC. (Eds.), Learning design: A handbook on modeling and delivering networked education and training (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Springer.
14.
KrauzR. (1986). Power and leadership in organizations. Transactional Analysis Journal, 16, 85–93.
15.
MountainA.DavidsonC. (2001). Working together: Organisational transactional analysis and business performance. Farnham, England: Gower Publishing.
16.
NapperR.NewtonT. (2000). Tactics: Transactional analysis concepts for all trainers, teachers and tutors + insight into collaborative learning strategies. Ipswich, England: TA Resources.
17.
NewtonT. (2006). Script, psychological life plans, and the learning cycle. Transactional Analysis Journal, 36, 186–195.
18.
SawyerR. K. (2006). Introduction: The new science of learning. In SawyerR. K., The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
ScardamaliaM.BereiterC. (2006) Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
SchmidG. (2008). The role concept of transactional analysis and other approaches to personality, encounter, and cocreativity for all professional fields. Transactional Analysis Journal, 38, 17–20.
21.
SpectorJ. M. (2000). Towards a philosophy of instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 1–6.
22.
SpielmanE.FriedlanderH. (Writers) ThorpeJ. (Director & producer) (1972, 22 February). Kung fu: The way of the tiger, the sign of the dragon [Television pilot/ABC Movie of the Week]. Los Angeles, CA: Warner Brothers.
23.
StewartI.JoinesV. (1987). TA today: A new introduction to transactional analysis. Nottingham, England, and Chapel Hill, NC: Lifespace Publishing.
