The supervision triangle is a new framework for enabling beginning and trainee supervisors to understand the process and to organize the content of their supervision. It can also be a self-monitoring tool for experienced supervisors and a teaching aid in supervisor training.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerneE. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. New York, NY: Grove Press.
2.
CassoniE. (2007). Parallel process in supervision and therapy: An opportunity for reciprocity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 37, 130–139.
3.
ClarkeJ. I. (1996). The synergistic use of five transactional analysis concepts by educators. Transactional Analysis Journal, 26, 214–219.
4.
ClarkeJ. I.DawsonC. (1998). Growing up again (2nd ed.). Center City, MN: Hazelden.
ClarksonP.LeighE. (1992). Integrating intuitive functioning with treatment planning in supervision. Transactional Analysis Journal, 22, 222–227.
7.
CoxM. (1998). Doing transactional analysis supervision. In LeachK. (Ed.), 1998 ITA conference papers: Transactional analysis reaches out (Paper 30). Pinner, UK: Institute of Transactional Analysis.
8.
CoxM. (2007). On doing supervision. Transactional Analysis Journal, 37, 104–114.
9.
ErskineR. (1982). Supervision of psychotherapy. Transactional Analysis Journal, 12, 314–321.
10.
HawkinsP.SmithN. (2006). Coaching, mentoring and organisational consultancy: Supervision and development. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
11.
HayJ. (1996). Transactional analysis for trainers. Watford, England: Sherwood Publishing.
12.
HayJ. (2007). Reflective practice and supervision for coaches. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
13.
KadushinA. (1976). Supervision in social work. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
14.
KadushinA.HarknesD. (2002). Supervision in social work. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
15.
MazzettiM. (2007). Supervision in transactional analysis: An operational model. Transactional Analysis Journal, 37, 93–103.
16.
MazzettiM. (2009). Transactional analysis certification exams: An opportunity to learn. Transactional Analysis Journal, 39, 270–275.
17.
MicholtN. (1992). Psychological distance and group interventions. Transactional Analysis Journal, 22, 228–233.
18.
NewtonT. (2003). Identifying educational philosophy and practice through imagoes in transactional analysis training groups. Transactional Analysis Journal, 33, 321–331.
19.
NewtonT. (2007). Course notes. Supervisor Training Programme for Coaching Development, London, England.
20.
NewtonT.NapperR. (2007). The bigger picture: Supervision as an educational framework for all fields. Transactional Analysis Journal, 37, 150–158.
21.
PierreN. (2002). Practique de l'analyse transactionnelle dans la classe [The practice of transactional analysis in the classroom]. Issey-les-Moulineaux, France: ESF Éditeur.
22.
ProctorB. (2000). Group supervision: A guide to creative practice. London, England: Sage.
23.
SillsC.MazzettiM. (2009). The comparative script system: A tool for developing supervisors. Transactional Analysis Journal, 39, 305–314.
24.
SteinerC. (1990). Scripts people live: Transactional analysis of life scripts (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Grove Weidenfeld.
25.
TempleS. (2004). Update on the functional fluency model in education. Transactional Analysis Journal, 34, 197–204.
TudorK. (2003). The neopsyche: The integrating adult ego state. In SillsC.HargadenH. (Eds.), Ego states (Vol. 1 of Key concepts in transactional analysis: Contemporary views) (pp. 201–231). London, England: Worth Publishing.
28.
van BeekumS. (2007). Supervision as a metamodality and a multiarea activity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 37, 140–139.
29.
ZalcmanM. J.CornellW. F. (1983). A bilateral model for clinical supervision. Transactional Analysis Journal, 13, 112–123.
