This article presents a detailed case study of a single transactional analysis
consultation session based on the supervisory processes first described by Eric Berne
(1968/1977) and John O'Hearne (1972). The consultation process included the client
directly in discussion about the ongoing therapy, including its successes and points
of impasse. The consultant, the therapist, and the client each reflect on the results
of the consultation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenjaminJ. (2006, 9 October). The analyst's fear of doing
harm. Paper presented at the London Voluntary Sector Resource Centre
sponsored by Confer, London, England.
2.
BerneE. (1977). Staff-patient staff
conferences. In JamesM. & Collaborators, Techniques in transactional analysis for
psychotherapists and counselors (pp.
153–165). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Original
work published 1968)
3.
BerneE. (1977). Primal images and primal
judgment. In BerneE., Intuition and ego states: The origins of transactional
analysis (McCormickP., Ed.) (pp. 67–97). San Francisco: TA
Press. (Original work published 1955)
4.
CornellW. F., & LandaicheN. M. (2006). Impasse and intimacy: Applying Berne's
concept of script protocol. Transactional Analysis
Journal, 36,
196–213.
5.
DimenM. (1994). Money, love and hate: Contradiction and
paradox in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues,
4, 60–100.
6.
DuffellN. (2000). The making of them: The British attitude
to children and the boarding school system.
London: Lone Arrow
Press.
7.
HughesT. (2004). Tom Brown's schooldays.
New York: Penguin.
(Original work published 1857)
8.
O'HearneJ. (1972). The patient as collaborator. In
JamesM. & Collaborators, Techniques in transactional analysis for
psychotherapists and counselors (pp.
176–186). Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
