The rise of relational transactional analysis in conjunction with a reconnection of transactional analysis with its psychoanalytic roots raises the question of the importance of these developments for organizational consultants in transactional analysis. This article explores what psychoanalysis and group relations offer to organizational consultants. The focus is on three core aspects of psychoanalysis: its perspective, the value of the object relations approach, and the understanding of the role of the unconscious. From there three contributions of psychoanalysis to consulting in organizations are elaborated and integrated in a relational approach to consulting. The key is the understanding of the role of the consultant as the “signifier of transformation” (Bollas, 1987, p. 14), who, while working with a client-organization, supports the organization in integrating its ways of relating into its way of being.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BainA.GouldL. (2000) The fifth basic assumption. In LawrenceW. G. (Ed.), Tongued with fire (pp. 92–119). London: Karnac.
2.
BarnesG. (Ed.). (1977). Transactional analysis after Eric Berne: Teachings and practices of three TA schools. New York: Harper's College Press.
3.
BerneE. (1971). A layman's guide to psychiatry and psychoanalysis. New York: Ballantine Books. (Original work published 1947 as The mind in action).
4.
BionW. (1961). Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.
5.
BionW. (1970). Attention and interpretation. New York: Basic Books.
6.
BionW. (1974). Bion's Brazilian lectures (vol. 2). Rio de Janeiro: Imago Editora.
7.
BollasC. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. London: Free Association Books.
8.
CornellF. (2005, 5 July). The ethics of relational transactional analysis [panel discussion]. Presentation at the World TA Conference on “Freedom and Responsibility,” Edinburgh, Scotland.
9.
CornellW. F.HargadenH. (2005). From transactions to relations: The emergence of a relational tradition in transactional analysis. Hawthorne, England: Haddon Press.
10.
ErskineR. G.MoursundJ. P. (1988). Integrative psychotherapy in action. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
ErskineR. G.MoursundJ. P.TrautmannR. L. (1999). Beyond empathy: A therapy of contact-in-relationship. London: Brunner/Mazel.
12.
FowlieH. (2005). Confusion and introjection: A model for understanding the defensive structures of the parent and child ego states. Transactional Analysis Journal, 35, 193–204.
13.
FreudS. (1925). Das ich und das es [The ego and the id]. In FreudS., Gesammelte schriften (vol. VI, pp. 352–392). Leipzig, Wien, Zurich: Internationaler Psycho-analytischer Verlag.
14.
GutmannD.PierreR. (2000) Consultation and transformation: Between shared management and generative leadership. In KleinE.BabelnickF.HerrP. (Eds.), Dynamic consultation in a changing workplace (pp. 3–32). Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.
15.
HargadenH. (Ed). (2005). Theme issue on “transactional analysis and psychoanalysis.”Transactional Analysis Journal, 35 (2).
16.
HargadenH.FentonB. (2005). An analysis of nonverbal transactions drawing on theories of intersubjectivity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 35, 173–186.
17.
HargadenH.SillsC. (2002). Transactional analysis: A relational perspective. London: Brunner/Routledge.
18.
HofstedeG. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Amsterdam: Contact.
19.
de VriesM. Kets (1996). Family business: Human dilemmas in the family firm. London: Thomson Press.
20.
de VriesM. KetsBaumH.DiamondM.GilkeyR. (1991). Organizations on the couch: Clinical perspectives on organizational behavior and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
KleinM. (1975a). Notes on some schizoid mechanism. In KleinM., The writings of Melanie Klein: Vol. HI: Envy and gratitude and other works 1946–1963. London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1946).
22.
KleinM. (1975b). The writings of Melanie Klein, Vol. I-IV. London: Hogarth Press and Institute for Psychoanalysis.
23.
KleinE.GabelnickF.HerrP. (2000). Dynamic consultation in a changing workplace. Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.
24.
KohutH. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment ofnarcissistic personality disorder. New York: International Universities Press.
25.
LandaicheN. M.III (2005). Engaged research: Encountering a transactional analysis training group through Bion's concept of containing. Transactional Analysis Journal, 35, 147–156.
26.
LoriaB. (Ed). (1997). Theme issue on “Transactional analysis and constructivism.”Transactional Analysis Journal, 27 (2).
27.
MitchellS. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
28.
MoisoC. (1985). Ego states and transference. Transactional Analysis Journal, 15, 194–201.
29.
ObholzerA. (1994). Freud, Klein and Bion: The Tavistock social systems model. In LapworthP. (Ed.), The Maastricht papers (pp. 20–29). Amersfoort, Netherlands: NVTA.
30.
ObholzerA.RobertsV. Zagier (1994). The unconscious at work. London: Routledge.
31.
PolsterE.PolsterM. (1974). Gestalt therapy integrated. New York: Vintage Books.
32.
SchmidB. (1988). Acceptance speech accepting the first EATA award 1988. Zeitschriftfur Transaktionsanalyse, 6, 141–163.
33.
SchmidB. (1991). Intuition of the possible and the transactional creation of realities. Transactional Analysis Journal, 21, 144–153.
34.
SchmidB. (1995). Wo ist der wind wenn er nicht weht? [Where is the wind when it does not blow?]. Paderborn: Junfermann.
35.
SieversB. (1994). Management, death and life itself. New York: De Gruyter.
SymingtonN. (1986). The analytic experience: Lectures from the Tavistock. London: Free Associations Books.
38.
TarachowS. (1963). Introduction to psychotherapy. New York: International Universities Press.
39.
TrevarthenC. (1979). Communication and co-operation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In BullaraM. (Ed.), Before speech: The beginning of human communication. London: Cambridge University Press.
40.
TurquetP. (1975). Threats to identity in the large group. In KreegerL. (Ed.), The large group: Dynamics and therapy (pp. 87–144). London: Constable.
41.
TudorK.HobbesR. (2002). Transactional analysis. In DrydenW. (Ed.), Handbook for individual therapy (4th ed.) (pp. 239–265). London: Sage.
42.
van BeekumS. (2005). The therapist as a new object. Transactional Analysis Journal, 35, 187–191.
43.
van BeekumS.KrijgsmanB. (2000). From autonomy to contact. Transactional Analysis Journal, 30, 52–51.
44.
Vansina-CobbaertM. (2002, 20 June). The other we might never understand if we forget that he is a stranger. Paper given at the Symposium of the International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organizations (ISPSO), Melbourne, Australia.
45.
VolkanV. (1999). When enemies talk: Psychoanalytic insights from Arab-Israeli dialogues [Freud lecture presented at Vienna University]. Vienna: Freud Museum.
46.
WellsL. (1995). The group as a whole: A systemic socio-analytic perspective on interpersonal and group relations. In GilletteA.McCollomB. (Eds.), Groups in context: A new perspective on group dynamics (pp. 49–85). Bethesda, Maryland: Unipress of America.
47.
WinnicottD. W. (1987). The child, the family, and the outside world. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Original work published 1965).
