This article is an edited transcript of a roundtable discussion on “The Ethics of Relational Transactional Analysis” held on 9 July 2005 during the World Transactional Analysis Conference in Edinburgh, Scotland. The roundtable was chaired by Helena Hargaden and Bill Cornell; participants included Jim Allen, Richard Erskine, Helena Hargaden, Carlo Moiso, Charlotte Sills, Graeme Summers, and Keith Tudor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngyalA. (1941). Foundations for a science of personality. New York: Commonwealth Fund.
2.
BollasC. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York: Columbia Press.
3.
CornellW. F.HargardenH. (2005). From transactions to relations: The emergence of a relational paradigm in transactional analysis. Chadlington: Haddon Press.
4.
McLaughlinJ. T. (2005). The healer's bent: Solitude and dialogue in the clinical encounter (CornellW. F., Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
5.
LeeR. D. (2004). The gestalt of values/The values of gestalt: A next step. In LeeR. G. (Ed.), The values of connection: A relational approach to ethics (pp. 3–34). Hillsdale, NJ: GestaltPress/The Analytic Press.
6.
LewinK. (1952). Field theory in social science. London: Tavistock.
7.
RogersC. R. (1942). Counseling and Psychotherapy: Newer concepts in practice. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
SillsCHargadenH. (Eds). (2003). Ego states (Key concepts in transactional analysis). London: Worth Publishing.
9.
SternD. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York: Norton.
TaftJ. (1933). The dynamics of therapy in a controlled relationship. New York: Macmillan.
12.
TudorK. (2003). The neopsyche: The integrating Adult ego state. In SillsC.HargadenH. (Eds.), Ego states (Key concepts in transactional analysis) (pp. 201–31). London: Worth Reading.
