This article links postmodern deconstruction of gender categories to the cultural and intrapsychic processes involved in gender script development. Hargaden and Sills's (2001) theory of the development of self is used to discuss the intrapsychic process of lesbian identity development. Poststructuralist theorist Theresa de Lauretis (1994) is discussed in relation to the claiming of body-ego that the lesbian may be expressing. Identity issues experienced by lesbians are discussed along with possible transference issues that may arise when the therapist is perceived as lesbian. Finally, therapists are invited to review their approach to gender and sexual identity development and presentation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJ. R., & AllenB. A. (1995). Narrative theory, redecision therapy, and postmodernism. Transactional Analysis Journal. 25, 327–334.
2.
AikenB. A. (1976). The stroke economy and gay people. Transactional Analysis Journal. 6, 21–27.
3.
BlackmoreS. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BollasC. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. London: Free Association Books.
ClarksonP. (1992). Transactional analysis psychotherapy: An integrated approach. London: Routledge.
7.
DaviesD., & NealC. (1996). Pink therapy: A guide for counsellors and therapists working with lesbian, gay and bisexual clients. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
8.
De LauretisT. (1994). The practice of love: Lesbian sexuality and perverse desire. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
9.
DowningC. (1996). Myths and mysteries of same-sex love. New York: Continuum.
10.
DrescherJ. (2001). Across the great divide: Gender panic in the analytic dyad. In GouldE. & KierskyS. (Eds.), Sexualities lost and found (pp. 91–109). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
11.
ErnstS. (1987). Can a daughter be a woman? Women's identity and psychological separation. In ErnstS. & MaquireM. (Eds.), Living with the sphinx (pp. 68–115). London: The Women's Press.
12.
ErskineR. G. (1997). Script cure: Behavioral, intrapsychic, and physiological. In ErskineR. G., Theories and methods of an integrative transactional analysis: A volume of selected articles (pp. 151–155). San Francisco: TA Press. (Original work published 1980)
13.
FonagyP., GergeleyG., JuristE. L., & TargetM. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the selfNew York: Other Press.
14.
HandyB. (1997, April 14). Roll over. Ward Cleaver. Time Magazine. 15, 60–66.
15.
HargadenH., & SillsC. (2001). Deconfusion of the child ego state: A relational perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 31, 55–70.
JamesM. (1998). Cultural scripts: Historical events vs. historical interpretation. In JamesM., Perspectives in transactional analysis (pp. 103–112). San Francisco: TA Press. (Original work published 1983)
18.
KulkarniC. (1997). Lesbians & lesbianism: A post-Jungian perspective. London: Routledge.
19.
BemS. Lipsitz (1998). Self-construction: The gendered body. In ClinchyB. M. & NoremJ. K. (Eds.), The gender and psychology reader (pp. 278–284). New York: New York University Press.
20.
MarecekJ., & Hare-MustinR. T. (1998). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism and psychology. In ClinchyB. M. & NoremJ. K. (Eds.), The gender and psychology reader (pp. 125–143). New York: New York University Press.
21.
MatzeM. G. (1988). Reciprocity in script formation: A revision of the concept of symbiosis. Transactional Analysis Journal. 18, 304–308.
MoisoC. (1985). Ego states and transference. Transactional Analysis Journal, 15, 194–201.
24.
PerlmanG. (2000). Transactional analysis and homosexuality: A literature review. Transactional Analysis Journal. 30, 276–284.
25.
RichA. (1981). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. London: Onlywomen Press.
26.
SiegelD. J. (2001). Toward an interpersonal neurobiology of the developing mind: Attachment relationships, “mindsight,” and neural integration. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1–2), 67–94.
