This speech discusses the processes of reasoning that are entailed in the building of scientific models and sets forth some generally accepted principles of model building. The speaker emphasizes that a “good” model can only be defined in terms of its usefulness, which in turn can only be judged against the intended use of the model. A model can never be said to be “correct” or “incorrect.” In light of these principles, the speaker suggests a critique of various different versions of the ego state model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerneE. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. New York: Grove Press (paperback edition).
2.
BerneE. (1966). Principles of group treatment. New York: Grove Press.
3.
BerneE. (1969). Standard nomenclature. Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 8(32), 111–112.
4.
BouldingK. (1966). The veriflability of economic images. In KruppS. R. (Ed.), The structure of economic science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BouldingK. (1970). Economics as a science. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
BronfenbrennerM. (1966). A middlebrow introduction to economic methodology. In KruppS. R. (Ed.), The structure of economic science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
CawsP. (1965). The philosophy of science. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
8.
ClarksonP.GilbertM. (1988). Berne's original model of ego states: Some theoretical considerations. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 20–29.
9.
ErskineR. (1988). Ego structure, intrapsychic function, and defense mechanisms: A commentary on Eric Berne's original theoretical concepts. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 15–19.
10.
ErskineR. (1991). Transference and transactions: Critique from an intrapsychic and integrative perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 21, 63–76.
11.
ErskineR.ClarksonP.GouldingR.GroderM.MoisoC. (1988). Ego state theory: Definitions, descriptions, and points of view. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 6–14.
12.
HohmuthA.GormlyA. (1982). Ego state models and personality structure. Transactional Analysis Journal, 12, 140–143.
13.
LoriaB. (1988). The parent ego state: Theoretical foundations and alterations. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 39–46.
14.
MargenauH. (1966). What is a theory? In KruppS. R. (Ed.), The structure of economic science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
PapandreouA. (1958). Economics as a science. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
16.
PopperK. (1972). The logic of scientific discovery (rev. ed.). London: Hutchinson.
17.
RyanA. (1970). The philosophy of the social sciences. London: Macmillan.
18.
StewartI. (1979). Reasoning and method in economics. London: McGraw-Hill.
19.
StewartI. (1992). Eric Berne. London: Sage.
20.
StewartI.JoinesV. (1987). TA today: A new introduction to transactional analysis. Nottingham, England, and Chapel Hill, NC: Lifespace Publishing.
21.
TilneyT. (1998). Dictionary of transactional analysis. London: Whurr.
22.
TrautmannR.ErskineR. (1981). Ego state analysis: A comparative view. Transactional Analysis Journal, 11, 178–185.
23.
WoollamsS.BrownM. (1979). TA: The total handbook of transactional analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.