In light of claims that sex roles are differentially related to behavioral flexibility, the current study investigated the relationship between sex role orientations and performance in interpersonal situations. Males and females in each of four sex role categories (masculine-typed, feminine-typed, androgynous and undifferentiated) role-played situations requiring the appropriate expression of either commendatory or refusal assertiveness. Androgynous subjects were most effective in rated skills components for both types of situations, while undifferentiated subjects were highly ineffective. Complex interpersonal situations apparently require the use of well-integrated masculine and feminine social skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerzinsJ. I.New perspectives on sex roles and personality dimensions. In BednarR. (Chair), Sex roles: Masculine, feminine, androgynous or none of the above? Symposium presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, 1975.
2.
WoodsM. M.The relation of sex role categories to autobiographical factors. In BednarR. (Chair), Sex roles: Masculine, feminine, androgynous or none of the above? Symposium presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, 1975.
3.
BernS. L.The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
4.
BemS. L.Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634–643.
5.
BemS. L.On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.
6.
BerzinsJ. I., WellingM. A., & WetterR. E.A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 136–138.
7.
ConstantinopleA.Masculinity-femininity: An exception to the famous dictum.Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 389–407.
8.
EislerR. M., HersenM., MillerP. M., & BlanchardE. B.Situational determinants of assertive behaviors.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 43, 330–340.
9.
EislerR. M., MillerP. M., & HersenM.Components of assertive behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 29, 295–299.
10.
HelmreichR., WilhelmJ., & StappJ.Life history questionnaire (short form): Instrument, norms and intercorrelations.Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1975, 5, 327.
11.
KellyJ. A., & WorellL.Parent behaviors related to masculine, feminine and androgynous sex role orientations.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 843–851.
12.
KellyJ. A., CaudillS., HathornS., & O'BrienC. G.Socially undesirable sex-correlated characteristics: Implications for androgyny and adjustment.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 1186–1187.
13.
KellyJ. A., & WorellJ.New formulations of sex roles and androgyny: A critical review.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 1101–1115.
14.
KellyJ. A., FurmanW., & YoungV.Problems associated with the typological measurement of sex roles and androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 1574–1576.
15.
LazarusA. A.Behavior therapy and beyond.New York: McGraw Hill, 1971.
16.
SpenceJ. T., HelmreichR., & StappJ.Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and feminity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.
17.
WinerB. J.Statistical principles in experimental design.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
