Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-12
Toward a More Gender-Inclusive Sexual Experiences Survey: Development and Preliminary Validation With Transgender and Gender-Expansive Survivors of Campus Sexual Assault
We adapted the Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) to be more inclusive of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people and undertook preliminary validation of the measure. We added gender-neutral language, assault types thought to be more common and more emotionally impactful among these individuals, and coercion tactics specific to transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expensive people. We piloted this Gender-Inclusive SES (GI-SES) with an online survey of transgender and gender-expansive undergraduates who experienced campus sexual assault. We assessed acceptability via rapid qualitative analysis of feedback. We gathered preliminary evidence of validity by calculating the agreement in assault type and coercion tactic between open-ended descriptions of the assault and the GI-SES response, as well as by testing four hypotheses about the relative frequency and severity of different types of assaults within the sample. Three hundred eighty-eight transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expensive students completed the survey. Qualitative responses indicated that participants felt the GI-SES was inclusive and respectful. Results were partially consistent with hypotheses supporting validity, and there was 90.9% agreement in assault type and 85.9% agreement in coercion tactics between GI-SES responses and written narratives. The GI-SES provides researchers, clinicians, and service providers with a tool, preliminarily validated with a trans and gender-diverse college sample, to capture the unique experiences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expensive sexual assault survivors.
AndersonR. E.CahillS. P.DelahantyD. L. (2018). The psychometric properties of the Sexual Experiences Survey–Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) and characteristics of sexual victimization experiences in college men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000073
3.
BauermeisterJ. A.PingelE.ZimmermanM.CouperM.Carballo-DieguezA.StrecherV. J. (2012). Data quality in HIV/AIDS web-based surveys: Handling invalid and suspicious data. Field Methods, 24(3), 272–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X12443097
4.
BellA. S.DinwiddieM.HambyS. (2018). Gender patterns in intimate partner violence: Results from 33 campus climate surveys based on the Partner Victimization Scale.Life Paths Appalachian Research Center. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34326.86086
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
6.
BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.BasileK. C.WaltersM. L.ChenK.MerrickM. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization -- National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm
7.
CananS. N.JozkowskiK. N.Wiersma-MosleyJ.Blunt-VintiH.BradleyM. (2020). Validation of the Sexual Experience Survey--Short Form Revised using lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual women’s narratives of sexual violence. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(3), 1067–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01543-7
CareyK.NorrisA.DurneyS.ShepardsonR.CareyM. (2018). Mental health consequences of sexual assault among first-year college women. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1431915
10.
ChenJ.WaltersM.GilbertL.PatelN. (2020). Sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence by sexual orientation, United States. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000252
11.
ConronK.LombardiE.ReisnerS. (2014). Identifying transgender and other gender minority respondents on population-based surveys: Approaches. In HermanJ. (Ed.), Best practices for asking questions to identify transgender and other gender minority respondents on population-based surveys (pp. 9–18). The Williams Institute.
12.
Cook-DanielsL. (2015). Intimate partner violence in transgender couples: ‘Power and control’ in a specific cultural context. Partner Abuse, 6(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.6.1.126
13.
DolanC. V.ConroyN. E. (2021). Centering transgender survivors’ experiences of intimate partner violence victimization: A critique of dominant approaches to research and service provision. Violence and Victims, 36(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-D-20-00077
14.
EisenbergM. E.LustK. A.HannanP. J.PortaC. (2016). Campus sexual violence resources and emotional health of college women who have experienced sexual assault. Violence and Victims, 31(2), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00049
15.
FedinaL.HolmesJ. L.BackesB. L. (2018). Campus sexual assault: A systematic review of prevalence research from 2000 to 2015. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016631129
GamarelK. E.Jadwin-CakmakL.KingW. M.Lacombe-DuncanA.TrammellR.ReyesL. A.BurksC.RiveraB.ArnoldE.HarperG. W. (2022). Stigma experienced by transgender women of color in their dating and romantic relationships: Implications for gender-based violence prevention programs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9-10), NP8161–NP8189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520976186
18.
GrantD.JansM.ParkR.PonceN.KilJ.GatesG.WilsonB. D.HermanJ. L. (2015). Putting the ‘T’ in LGBT: A pilot test of questions to identify transgender people in the California Health Interview Survey. Joint Statistical Meetings Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section, 4034–4040.
19.
GrinerS. B.VamosC. A.ThompsonE. L.LoganR.Vazquez-OteroC.DaleyE. M. (2020). The intersection of gender identity and violence: Victimization experienced by transgender college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23-24), 5704–5725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517723743
20.
Guadalupe-DiazX. L.AnthonyA. K. (2017). Discrediting identity work: Understandings of intimate partner violence by transgender survivors. Deviant Behavior, 38(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1189757
21.
Guadalupe-DiazX. L.JasinskiJ. (2017, May). "I wasn't a priority, I wasn't a victim": Challenges in help seeking for transgender survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 23(6), 772–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216650288v
HoxmeierJ. (2016). Sexual assault and relationship abuse victimization of transgender undergraduate students in a national sample. Violence and Gender, 3(4), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2016.0008
26.
JamesS. E.HermanJ.KeislingM.MottetL.AnafiM. (2019). 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (USTS): Version 1 (Version v1) [dataset]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37229.V1
JeffreyN. K.SennC. Y. (2024). Gender differences in sexual violence perpetration behaviors and validity of perpetration reports: A mixed-method study. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–16. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2322591
29.
KossM.AbbeyA.CampbellR.CookS.NorrisJ.TestaM.UllmanS.WestC.WhiteJ. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
30.
KossM. P.AndersonR. E.PetersonZ. D.LittletonH. L.AbbeyA.ThompsonM. P.CananS. N.WhiteJ. W.McCauleyH. L.OrchowskiL. M.FedinaL. M.LopezE. C.AllenC. T.SwartoutK. (2023). The revised victimization version of the sexual experiences survey (SES-V): Process, foundations, evidence, and items. [Invited manuscript, under review]. OSFHome. https://osf.io/hxpsk/
31.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(3), 422–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.422
32.
LévesqueS.RodrigueC.Beaulieu-PrévostD.BlaisM.BoislardM.-A.LévyJ. J. (2016). Intimate partner violence, sexual assault, and reproductive health among university women. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 25(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.251-A5
MosesonH.LunnM. R.KatzA.FixL.DurdenM.StoefflerA.HastingsJ.CudlitzL.GoldbergE.Lesser-LeeB.LetcherL.ReyesA.FlentjeA.CapriottiM. R.LubenskyM. E.Obedin-MaliverJ. (2020). Development of an affirming and customizable electronic survey of sexual and reproductive health experiences for transgender and gender nonbinary people. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0232154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232154
35.
PeitzmeierS. M.WirtzA. L.HumesE.HughtoJ. M. W.CooneyE.ReisnerS. L. (2021). The transgender-specific intimate partner violence scale for research and practice: Validation in a sample of transgender women. Social Science & Medicine, 291, 114495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114495
36.
RothmanK.Georgia SalivarE.RoddyM. K.HatchS. G.DossB. D. (2021). Sexual assault among women in college: Immediate and long-term associations with mental health, psychosocial functioning, and romantic relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19-20), 9600–9622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519870158
37.
SchexnayderJ.PerryK. R.SheahanK.Majette ElliottN.SubramaniamS.StrawbridgeE.WebelA. R.BosworthH. B.GierischJ. M. (2023). Team-based qualitative rapid analysis: Approach and considerations for conducting developmental formative evaluation for intervention design. Qualitative Health Research, 33(8–9), 778–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231167348
38.
SmidtA. M.RosenthalM. N.SmithC. P.FreydJ. J. (2021). Out and in harm's way: Sexual minority students’ psychological and physical health after institutional betrayal and sexual assault. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 30(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2019.1581867
39.
St. GeorgeS. M.HarknessA. R.Rodriguez-DiazC. E.WeinsteinE. R.PaviaV.HamiltonA. B. (2023). Applying rapid qualitative analysis for health equity: Lessons learned using ‘EARS’ with Latino communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231164938
40.
Struckman-JohnsonC.Struckman-JohnsonD. (1994). Men pressured and forced into sexual experience. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01541620
41.
SwartoutK. M.FlackW. F.CookS. L.OlsonL. N.SmithP. H.WhiteJ. W. (2019). Measuring campus sexual misconduct and its context: The Administrator-Researcher Campus Climate Consortium (ARC3) survey. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 11(5), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000395
42.
TaylorB.HenshallC.KenyonS.LitchfieldI.GreenfieldS. (2018). Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open, 8(10), e019993. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019993
43.
TeitcherJ. E.BocktingW. O.BauermeisterJ. A.HoeferC. J.MinerM. H.KlitzmanR. L. (2015). Detecting, preventing, and responding to ‘fraudsters’ in internet research: Ethics and tradeoffs. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12200
44.
TestaM.VanZile-TamsenC.LivingstonJ. A.KossM. P. (2004). Assessing women's experiences of sexual aggression using the Sexual Experiences Survey: Evidence for validity and implications for research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(3), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00143.x
45.
Vindrola-PadrosC.JohnsonG. A. (2020). Rapid techniques in qualitative research: A critical review of the literature. Qualitative Health Research, 30(10), 1596–1604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320921835
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
