It is vital for women to publish their writing for tenure and promotion so that they are no longer underrepresented as senior scholars in academia. Furthermore, it is important that their radical and important ideas are published and not lost to history. For the 2022 Carolyn Wood Sherif Award talk, I focused on five topics: (1) publishing is vital for women in academia; (2) women may not feel entitled to write and publish; (3) women need to learn how to be invited to publish; (4) women may leave academia; and (5) feminist writing is political, radical, and important.
AdamsK. (1998). Built out of books: Lesbian energy and feminist ideology in alternative publishing. Journal of Homosexuality, 34(3–4), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v34n03_07
BerheideC. W.CarpenterM. A.CotterD. A. (2022). Teaching college in the time of COVID-19: Gender and race differences in faculty emotional labor. Sex Roles, 86, 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01271-0
4.
BeswickG.RothblumE. D.MannL. (1988). Psychological antecedents of student procrastination. Australian Psychologist, 23, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050068808255605
5.
CampbellR. (2001). Emotionally involved: The impact of researching rape. Routledge.
6.
CardelM. I.DhurandharE.Yarar-FisherC.FosterM.HidalgoB.McClureL. A.PagatoS.BrownN.PekmeziD.SharafeldinN.WilligA. L.AngeliniC. (2020). Turning chutes into ladders for women faculty: A review and roadmap for equity in academia. Journal of Women's Health, 29(5), 721–733. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.8027
7.
CastaňedaM.IsgroK. (Eds.) (2013). Mothers in academia. Columbia University Press.
8.
CheslerP.RothblumE. D.ColeE. (Eds.) (1995). Feminist foremothers in women’s studies, psychology and mental health. Harrington Park Press.
9.
DavisG.KhonachT. (2020). The paradox of positionality: Avoiding, embracing, or resisting feminist accountability. Fat Studies, 9(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2019.1628604
10.
DavisP. B.MeagherE. A.PomeroyC.LoweW. L.RubensteinA. H.WuJ. Y.CurtisA. B.JacksonR. D. (2022). Pandemic-related barriers to the success of women in research: A framework for action. Nature Medicine, 28(3), 436–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01692-8
11.
EcklundE. H.LincolnA. E. (2016). Failing families, failing science: Work-family conflict in academic science. New York University Press.
12.
EvansE.GrantC. (Eds.) (2008). Mama, Ph.D.: Women write about motherhood and academic life. Rutgers University Press.
13.
FranksV.RothblumE. D. (Eds.) (1983). The stereotyping of women: Its effects on mental health. Springer.
14.
FreemanJ. (1979). How to discriminate against women without really trying. In FreemanJ. (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (2nd ed., pp. 194–208). Mayfield.
15.
GardnerS. K.HartJ.NgJ.Ropers-HuilmanR.WardK.Wolf-WendelL. (2017). “Me-search”: Challenges and opportunities regarding subjectivity in knowledge construction. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 8(2), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00014
16.
GartrellN. (2020). Overview of the 35-year US National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study and its 92% retention rate. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 17(3), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2020.1861573
17.
GartrellN. K.RothblumE. D. (Eds.) (2001). Everyday mutinies: Funding lesbian activism. Harrington Park Press.
18.
GhodseeK.ConnellyR. (2014). Professor Mommy: Finding work-family balance in academia. Rowman & Littlefield.
HillM. (2014). Diary of a country therapist. Routledge.
21.
JankoviczN. (2022). How to be a woman online: Surviving abuse and harassment, and how to fight back. Bloomsbury Academic.
22.
KitzingerC.BolaM.CamposA. B.CarabineJ.DohertyK.FrithH.McNultyA.ReillyJ.WinnJ. (1996). Speaking of representing the other. Feminism & Psychology, 6(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353596062011
23.
MenaJ. A.PittmanD. M. (2022). A thunderbolt strikes psychology: The inspirational life of Laura Brown. Women & Therapy, Advance online publication.https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2022.2125619
24.
MintzB.RothblumE. D. (1997). Lesbians in academia: Degrees of freedom. Routledge.
25.
MoletsaneR.HaysomL.ReddyV. (2015). Knowledge production, critique and peer review in feminist publishing: reflections from agenda. Critical Arts, 29(6), 766–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2015.1151112
26.
NaqviZ. B.RussellY. (2020). A Wench’s guide to surviving a ‘global’pandemic crisis: Feminist publishing in a time of COVID-19. Feminist Legal Studies, 28(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-020-09435-1
27.
OdicD.WojcikE. H. (2020). The publication gender gap in psychology. American Psychologist, 75(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000480
RothblumE. D. (1988). Leaving the ivory tower: Factors contributing to women's voluntary resignation from academia. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 14–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3346465
30.
RothblumE. D.BrehonyK.SolomonL. J.ZegmanM.MuehlenhardC. (April, 1980). Sex role stereotypes and women's mental health: Lessons from the past and implications for the future. Symposium presented at the Annual Convention of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
31.
RothblumE. D.SolomonL. J.MurakamiJ. (1986). Affective, cognitive, and behavioral differences between high and low procrastinators. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.33.4.387
32.
ShieldsS. A.SignorellaM. L. (2014). Carolyn Wood Sherif (1922–1982): Feminist social psychology in the service of equality for all peoples. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(4), 443–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843145521
33.
SolomonL. J.RothblumE. D. (1984). Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503-509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503
34.
Turner KellyB.Fries-BrittS. (2022). Building mentoring networks to support Black women. Routledge.
WilsonB. D. M. (2009). Widening the dialogue to narrow the gap in health disparities: Approaches to fat Black lesbian and bisexual women’s health promotion. In RothblumE.SolovayS. (Eds.), The fat studies reader (pp. 54–64). New York University Press.
39.
YoderJ. D. (2018). Challenging the gendered academic hierarchy: The artificial separation of research, teaching, and feminist activism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318762695