Is Feminist Identity Beneficial for Women’s Career Aspirations? Examining Feminist Identity Profiles

Abstract

Using latent profile analysis, we examined whether different feminist identity profiles are differentially related to career-related cognitions among women. We identified profiles of feminist identity based on feminist attitudes, feminist self-identification, and participation in feminist activism. In addition, we examined whether the profiles are differentially related to women’s career aspirations, anticipated family-interference-with-work, and willingness to compromise career for family. In Study 1, three profiles of feminist identity (Non-labeler, Passive feminist, and Active feminist) emerged from responses of 282 female undergraduate and graduate students (M_age = 20.47). In Study 2, three profiles of feminist identity (Non-feminist, Non-labeler, and Active feminist) emerged from responses of 490 adults recruited from Mechanical Turk (M_age = 38.62). Results showed that the profiles characterized by stronger feminist self-identification were more positively related to women’s career-related cognitions than the profiles characterized by weaker feminist self-identification. Moreover, the profiles characterized by stronger participation in feminist activism were more positively associated with career-related cognitions. These findings suggest a potential benefit of feminist identity and participation in feminist activism for women’s career aspirations.

Keywords

feminist identity career aspirations latent profile analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Council on Education . (2017). Women presidents profile - American College President Study. https://www.aceacps.org/women-presidents/

Aronson

(2003). Feminists or “postfeminists”?: Young women’s attitudes toward feminism and gender relations. Gender & Society, 17(6), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243203257145

Arvin

Tuck

Morrill

(2013). Decolonizing feminism: Challenging connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy. Feminist Formations, 25(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2013.0006

Ashmore

R. D.

Deaux

McLaughlin-Volpe

(2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80

Askari

S. F.

Liss

Erchull

M. J.

Staebell

S. E.

Axelson

S. J.

(2010). Men want equality, but women don’t expect it: Young adults’ expectations for participation in household and childcare chores. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01565.x

Barr

(2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 435–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505283421

Bauer

D. J.

Curran

P. J.

(2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.9.1.3

Bay-Cheng

L. Y.

Zucker

A. N.

(2007). Feminism between the sheets: Sexual attitudes among feminists, nonfeminists, and egalitarians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00349.x

Berlin

K. S.

Williams

N. A.

Parra

G. R.

(2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (part 1): Overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst084

10.

Bowleg

(2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 312–325. https://doi.org./10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z

11.

Brassel

S. T.

Anderson

V. N.

(2020). Who thinks outside the gender box? Feminism, gender self-esteem, and attitudes toward trans people. Sex Roles, 82(7–8), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01066-4

12.

Brewster

K. L.

Padavic

(2000). Change in gender-ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(2), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00477.x

13.

Burn

S. M.

Aboud

Moyles

(2000). The relationship between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex Roles, 42(11–12), 1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007044802798

14.

Catalyst . (2020). Pyramid: Women in S&P 500 companies. https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-sp-500-companies/

15.

Chan

(2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In Lance

C. E.

Vandenberg

R. J.

(Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 309–336). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867266-22

16.

Cinamon

R. G.

(2006). Anticipated work-family conflict: Effects of gender, self-efficacy, and family background. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00152.x

17.

Cole

E. R.

(2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564

18.

Cole

E. R.

Zucker

A. N.

(2007). Black and white women’s perspectives on femininity. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.13.1.1

19.

Conway

J. M.

Lance

C. E.

(2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6

20.

Coppock

Haydon

Richter

(2004). The illusions of "post-feminism": New women, old myths. Taylor & Francis.

21.

Craig

Mullan

(2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare: A cross-national time- use comparison. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 834–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411427673

22.

Crenshaw

(1993). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In Weisbert

D. K.

(Ed.), Feminist legal theory: Foundations (pp. 383–395). Temple University Press. (Original work published 1989) https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500480-5

23.

Dahling

J. J.

Gabriel

A. S.

MacGowan

(2017). Understanding typologies of feedback environment perceptions: A latent profile investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 101, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.007

24.

DeBlaere

Bertsch

K. N.

(2013). Perceived sexist events and psychological distress of sexual minority women of color: The moderating role of womanism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312470436

25.

Derks

Van Laar

Ellemers

(2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007

26.

DeSilver

(2014, April 8). Rising cost of child care may help explain recent increase in stay-at-home moms. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/04/08/rising-cost-of-child-care-may-help-explain-increase-in-stay-at-home-moms/

27.

Downing

N. E.

Roush

K. L.

(1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13(4), 695–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000085134013

28.

Duncan

L. E.

(2010). Women’s relationship to feminism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01599.x

29.

Eagly

A. H.

Carli

L. L.

(2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730910935800

30.

Eisele

Stake

(2008). The differential relationship of feminist attitudes and feminist identity to self-efficacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00432.x

31.

Ellemers

(2014). Women at work: How organizational features impact career development. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549327

32.

Ellemers

Rink

Derks

Ryan

M. K.

(2012). Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this). Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.10.003

33.

Ellingrud

(2019. January 30). How women leaders change company dynamics. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kweilinellingrud/2019/01/30/how-women-leaders-change-company-dynamics/

34.

Ely

R.J.

Rhode

D.L.

(2010). Women and leadership: Defining the challenges. In Khurana

Nohria

(Eds.), Leadership: Advancing an intellectual discipline (pp. 377–410). Harvard Business Press.

35.

Erchull

M. J.

Liss

Wilson

K. A.

Bateman

Peterson

Sanchez

C. E.

(2009). The feminist identity development model: Relevant for young women today? Sex Roles, 60(11–12), 832–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9588-6

36.

Fedi

Rollero

(2016). If stigmatized, self-esteem is not enough: Effects of sexism, self-esteem and social identity on leadership aspiration. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(4), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i4.984

37.

Felder

J. N.

Roubinov

Bush

N. R.

Coleman-Phox

Vieten

Laraia

Adler

N. E.

Epel

(2018). Effect of prenatal mindfulness training on depressive symptom severity through 18-months postpartum: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(7), 1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22592

38.

Ferree

M. M.

Miller

F. D.

(1985). Mobilization and meaning: Toward an integration of social psychological and resource perspectives on social movements. Sociological Inquiry, 55(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1985.tb00850.x

39.

Fingeret

M. C.

Gleaves

D. H.

(2004). Sociocultural, feminist, and psychological influences on women’s body satisfaction: A structural modeling analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(4), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00154.x

40.

Fitz

C. C.

Zucker

A. N.

Bay-Cheng

L. Y.

(2012). Not all nonlabelers are created equal. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(3), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312451098

41.

Frederick

J. K.

Stewart

A. J.

(2018). “I became a lioness”: Pathways to feminist identity among women’s movement activists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318771326

42.

Friedman

Leaper

(2010). Sexual-minority college women’s experiences with discrimination: Relations with identity and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01558.x

43.

Gabriel

A. S.

Campbell

J. T.

Djurdjevic

Johnson

R. E.

Rosen

C. C.

(2018). Fuzzy profiles: Comparing and contrasting latent profile analysis and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis for person-centered research. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 877–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117752466

44.

Gabriel

A. S.

Daniels

M. A.

Diefendorff

J. M.

Greguras

G. J.

(2015). Emotional labor actors: A latent profile analysis of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037408

45.

Ganginis Del Pino

H. V.

O'Brien

K. M.

Mereish

Miller

M. J.

(2013). “Leaving before she leaves”: Considering future family when making career plans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032651

46.

Gilbert

D. T.

Pinel

E. C.

Wilson

T. D.

Blumberg

S. J.

Wheatley

T. P.

(1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617

47.

Goulden

Mason

M. A.

Frasch

(2011). Keeping women in the science pipeline. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211416925

48.

Gray

M. P.

O’Brien

K. M.

(2007). Advancing the assessment of women’s career choices: The career aspiration scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(3), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707301211

49.

Green

F. J.

(2005). Feminist mothering: Challenging gender inequality by resisting the institution of motherhood and raising children to be critical agents of social change. Socialist Studies/Études Socialistes, 1(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.18740/s42k57

50.

Greenwood

R. M.

(2008). Intersectional political consciousness: Appreciation for intragroup differences and solidarity in diverse groups. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00405.x

51.

Gregor

M. A.

O’Brien

K. M.

(2016). Understanding career aspirations among young women: Improving instrumentation. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599537

52.

Guzmán

I. M.

Valdivia

A. N.

(2004). Brain, brow, and booty: Latina iconicity in U.S. popular culture. The Communication Review, 7(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490448723

53.

Hall

E. J.

Rodriguez

M. S.

(2003). The myth of postfeminism. Gender & Society, 17(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243203257639

54.

Hays

(1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.

55.

Henderson-King

D. H.

Stewart

A. J.

(1994). Women or feminists? Assessing women’s group consciousness. Sex Roles, 31(9–10), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01544276

56.

Henderson-King

Stewart

A. J.

(1997). Feminist consciousness: Perspectives on women’s experience. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234007

57.

Henderson-King

Stewart

A. J.

(1999). Educational experiences and shifts in group consciousness: Studying women. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003010

58.

Henley

N. M.

Meng

O’Brien

McCarthy

W. J.

Sockloskie

R. J.

(1998). Developing a scale to measure the diversity of feminist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(3), 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00158.x

59.

Hideg

Shen

(2019). Why still so few? A theoretical model of the role of benevolent sexism and career support in the continued underrepresentation of women in leadership positions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051819849006

60.

Horne

Mathews

Detrie

Burke

Cook

(2001). Look it up under “F”: Dialogues of emerging and experienced feminists. Women & Therapy, 23(2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/j015v23n02_02

61.

Howard

Gagné

Morin

A. J. S.

Van den Broeck

(2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95–96, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004

62.

Huddy

Neely

F. K.

Lafay

M. R.

(2000). The polls—trends: Support for the women’s movement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 309–350. https://doi.org/10.1086/317991

63.

Hurt

M. M.

Nelson

J. A.

Turner

D. L.

Haines

M. E.

Ramsey

L. R.

Erchull

M. J.

Liss

(2007). Feminism: What is it good for? Feminine norms and objectification as the link between feminist identity and clinically relevant outcomes. Sex Roles, 57(5–6), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9272-7

64.

Johnston

D. D.

Swanson

D. H.

(2006). Constructing the “good mother”: The experience of mothering ideologies by work status. Sex Roles, 54(7–8), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9021-3

65.

Kee

Y. H.

Wang

J. C. K.

Kailani

M. I. B.

(2018). Motivations for volunteering and its associations with time perspectives and life satisfaction: A latent profile approach. Psychological Reports, 121(5), 932–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117741653

66.

Kelly

(2015). Feminist identity, collective action, and individual resistance among contemporary US feminists. Women’s Studies International Forum, 48, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.10.025

67.

Knudsen

Waerness

(2009). Shared or separate? Money management and changing norms of gender equality among Norwegian couples. Community, Work & Family, 12(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802009406

68.

Kormos

Gifford

(2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003

69.

Leach

C. W.

van Zomeren

Zebel

Vliek

M. L. W.

Pennekamp

S. F.

Doosje

Ouwerkerk

J. W.

Spears

(2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144

70.

Leaper

Arias

D. M.

(2011). College women’s feminist identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for coping with sexism. Sex Roles, 64(7–8), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9936-1

71.

Leicht

Gocłowska

M. A.

Van Breen

J. A.

de Lemus

Randsley de Moura

(2017). Counter-stereotypes and feminism promote leadership aspirations in highly identified women. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00883

72.

Lemaster

Strough

Stoiko

DiDonato

(2015). To have and to do: Masculine facets of gender predict men’s and women’s attitudes about gender equality among college students. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036429

73.

Lewis

J. A.

Neville

H. A.

(2015). Construction and initial validation of the gendered racial microaggressions scale for black women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000062

74.

(2014). Hitting the ceiling: An examination of the barriers to success for Asian American women. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 29(1), 140–167. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2254711

75.

Liss

Erchull

M. J.

(2010). Everyone feels empowered: Understanding feminist self- labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01544.x

76.

Liss

O’Connor

Morosky

Crawford

(2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00014

77.

Lorde

(1984). Sister outsider. Crossing Press.

78.

MacDonald

P. L.

Gardner

R. C.

(2000). Type I error rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for I × J chi-square tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970871

79.

Major

(1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 26, pp. 293–355). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60156-2

80.

Marsh

H. W.

Lüdtke

Trautwein

Morin

A. J. S.

(2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(2), 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751010

81.

McCabe

(2005). What’s in a label? The relationship between feminist self-identification and “feminist” attitudes among US women and men. Gender & Society, 19(4), 480–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204273498

82.

McLarnon

M. J. W.

Carswell

J. J.

Schneider

T. J.

(2015). A case of mistaken identity? Latent profiles in vocational interests. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(1), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714523251

83.

Miller

Quealy

Sanger-Katz

(2018, April 24). The top jobs where women are outnumbered by men named John. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/04/24/upshot/women-and-men-named-john.html

84.

Moeller

Ivcevic

White

A. E.

Menges

J. I.

Brackett

M. A.

(2018). Highly engaged but burned out: Intra-individual profiles in the US workforce. The Career Development International, 23(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-12-2016-0215

85.

Morgan

B. L.

(1996). Putting the feminism into feminism scales: Introduction of a liberal feminist attitude and ideology scale. Sex Roles, 34(5–6), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01547807

86.

Morin

A. J. S.

Marsh

H. W.

(2015). Disentangling shape from level effects in person- centered analyses: An illustration based on university teachers’ multidimensional profiles of effectiveness. Structural Equation Modeling, 22(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919825

87.

Moya

P. M. L.

(2001). Chicana feminism and postmodernist theory. Signs, 26(2), 441–483. https://doi.org/10.1086/495600

88.

Mukkamala

Suyemoto

K. L.

(2018). Racialized sexism/sexualized racism: A multimethod study of intersectional experiences of discrimination for Asian American women. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000104

89.

Murnen

S. K.

Smolak

(2009). Are feminist women protected from body image problems? A meta-analytic review of relevant research. Sex Roles, 60(3–4), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9523-2

90.

Muthén

(2003). Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.8.3.369

91.

Myaskovsky

Wittig

M. A.

(1997). Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex Roles, 37(11–12), 861–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02936344

92.

Nauta

M. M.

Epperson

D. L.

Kahn

J. H.

(1998). A multiple-groups analysis of predictors of higher level career aspirations among women in mathematics, science, and engineering majors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.4.483

93.

Nelson

J. A.

Liss

Erchull

M. J.

Hurt

M. M.

Ramsey

L. R.

Turner

D. L.

Haines

M. E.

(2008). Identity in action: Predictors of feminist self-identification and collective action. Sex Roles, 58(9–10), 721–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9384-0

94.

Nylund

Bellmore

Nishina

Graham

(2007). Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization: What does latent class analysis say? Child Development, 78(6), 1706–1722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01097.x

95.

O’Brien

K. M.

(1996). The influence of psychological separation and parental attachment on the career development of adolescent women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0024

96.

O’Brien

K. M

Friedman

S. M.

Tipton

L. C.

Linn

S. G.

(2000). Attachment, separation, and women’s vocational development: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.3.301

97.

Overall

N. C.

Hammond

M. D.

(2018). How intimate relationships contribute to gender inequality: Sexist attitudes encourage women to trade off career success for relationship security. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732217745096

98.

Parent

M. C.

DeBlaere

Moradi

(2013). Approaches to research on intersectionality: Perspectives on gender, LGBT, and racial/ethnic identities. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0283-2

99.

Prabhakar

Lamar

Shaikh

Brown

(2018, March 7). Smashing IT’s glass ceiling: Perspectives from leading women CIOs. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/cio-insider-business-insights/perspectives-from-leading-women-chief-information-officers.html

100.

Reid

Purcell

(2004). Pathways to feminist identification. Sex Roles, 50(11–12), 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000029095.40767.3c

101.

Rivers

(2017). Postfeminism(s) and the arrival of the fourth wave: Turning tides. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59812-3

102.

Robnett

R. D.

Anderson

K. J.

(2017). Feminist identity among women and men from four ethnic groups. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23(1), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000095

103.

Robnett

R. D.

Anderson

K. J.

Hunter

L. E.

(2012). Predicting feminist identity: Associations between gender-traditional attitudes, feminist stereotyping, and ethnicity. Sex Roles, 67(3–4), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0170-2

104.

Rogan

Budgeon

(2018). The personal is political: Assessing feminist fundamentals in the digital age. Social Sciences, 7(8), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7080132

105.

Rosenberg

J. M.

van Lissa

C. J.

Beymer

P. N.

Anderson

D. J.

Schell

M. J.

Schmidt

J. A.

(2019). tidyLPA: Easily carry out latent profile analysis (LPA) using open-source or commercial software [Computer software]. https://data-edu.github.io/tidyLPA/

106.

Roy

R. E.

Weibust

K. S.

Miller

C. T.

(2007). Effects of stereotypes about feminists on feminist self-identification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00348.x

107.

Rudman

L. A.

Fairchild

(2007). The F word: Is feminism incompatible with beauty and romance? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00346.x

108.

Sabik

N. J.

Tylka

T. L.

(2006). Do feminist identity styles moderate the relatiotn between perceived sexist events and disordered eating? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00264.x

109.

Savela

A. E.

O’Brien

K. M.

(2016). Predicting college women’s career plans: Instrumentality, work, and family. Journal of Career Development, 43(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845315602118

110.

Signorella

M. L.

(2020). Toward a more just feminism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(2), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684320908320

111.

Silván-Ferrero

López

A. B.

(2007). Benevolent sexism toward men and women: Justification of the traditional system and conventional gender roles in Spain. Sex Roles, 57(7–8), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9271-8

112.

Simon

Hamilton

D. L.

(1994). Self-stereotyping and social context: The effects of relative in-group size and in-group status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.699

113.

Simon

Klandermans

(2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.4.319

114.

Snyder

Hasbrouck

(1996). Feminist identity, gender traits, and symptoms of disturbed eating among college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(4), 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00324.x

115.

Spurk

Hirschi

Wang

Valero

Kauffeld

(2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445

116.

Sue

D. W.

Capodilupo

C. M.

Torino

G. C.

Bucceri

J. M.

Holder

A. M. B.

Nadal

K. L.

Esquilin

(2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.62.4.271

117.

Szymanski

D. M.

(2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000037759.33014.55

118.

Szymanski

D. M.

Lewis

J. A.

(2016). Gendered racism, coping, identity centrality, and African American college women’s psychological distress. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315616113

119.

Szymanski

D. M.

Stewart

D. N.

(2010). Racism and sexism as correlates of African American women’s psychological distress. Sex Roles, 63(3–4), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9788-0

120.

Tarrant

M. A.

Cordell

H. K.

(1997). The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. Environment and Behavior, 29(5), 618–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916597295002

121.

Taylor

(2017). How we get free: Black feminism and the Combahee River Collective. Haymarket Books.

122.

Turner

J. C.

Hogg

M. A.

Oakes

P. J.

Reicher

S. D.

Wetherell

M. S.

(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.2307/2073157

123.

Turner

J. C.

Oakes

P. J.

Haslam

S. A.

McGarty

(1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205002

124.

Turner

J. C.

Onorato

R. S.

(1999). Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: A self- categorizing perspective. In Tyler

T. R.

Kramer

R. M.

John

O. P.

(Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 11–46). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

125.

United States Bureau of Labor Statistics . (2021). Women in the labor force: A databook. https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-databook/2020/home.htm

126.

van Anders

S. M.

(2004). Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors. Sex Roles, 51(9–10), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-5461-9

127.

van Zomeren

Postmes

Spears

(2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

128.

Walker

D. F.

Tokar

D. M.

Fischer

A. R.

(2000). What are eight popular masculinity-related instruments measuring? Underlying dimensions and their relations to sociosexuality. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 1(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.1.2.98

129.

Wang

Hanges

P. J.

(2011). Latent class procedures: Applications to organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 14(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110383988

130.

Warner

L. R.

Shields

S. A.

(2018). Intersectionality as a framework for theory and research in feminist psychology. In Dess

N. K.

Marecek

Bell

L. C.

(Eds.), Gender, sex, and sexualities: Psychological perspectives (pp. 29–52). Oxford University Press.

131.

Weer

C. H.

Greenhaus

J. H.

Colakoglu

S. N.

Foley

(2006). The role of maternal employment, role-altering strategies, and gender in college students’ expectations of work-family conflict. Sex Roles, 55(7–8), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9107-y

132.

Weiss

N. H.

Darosh

A. G.

Contractor

A. A.

Forkus

S. R.

Dixon-Gordon

K. L.

Sullivan

T. P.

(2018). Heterogeneity in emotion regulation difficulties among women victims of domestic violence: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 239, 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.009

133.

Westring

A. F.

Ryan

A. M.

(2011). Anticipated work–family conflict: A construct investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.004

134.

White

A. M.

(2006). Racial and gender attitudes as predictors of feminist activism among self-identified African American feminists. Journal of Black Psychology, 32(4), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798406292469

135.

Williams

C. B.

Wiggins

M. I.

(2010). Womanist spirituality as a response to the racism- sexism double bind in African American women. Counseling and Values, 54(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007x.2010.tb00015.x

136.

Williams

Wittig

M. A.

(1997). “I’m not a feminist, but”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro–feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37(11–12), 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02936345

137.

Wilson

T. D.

Gilbert

D. T.

(2003). Affective forecasting. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 345–411). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(03)01006-2

138.

Wright

S. C.

Taylor

D. M.

Moghaddam

F. M.

(1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994

139.

Yoder

J. D.

Tobias

Snell

A. F.

(2011). When declaring “I am a feminist” matters: Labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64(1–2), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9890-3

140.

Zinn

M. B.

Dill

B. T.

(1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22(2), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178416

141.

Zucker

A. N.

(2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, “I’m not a feminist, but.”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x

142.

Zucker

A. N.

Bay-Cheng

L. Y.

(2010). Minding the gap between feminist identity and attitudes: The behavioral and ideological divide between feminists and non-labelers. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1895–1924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00673.x