Research Methods in Psychology: A Feminist Exercise to Facilitate Students’ Understanding of Operational Definitions,Observation,and Inter-Rater Reliability
Restricted accessBrief reportFirst published online June, 2020
Research Methods in Psychology: A Feminist Exercise to Facilitate Students’ Understanding of Operational Definitions,Observation,and Inter-Rater Reliability
AciernoR.ResnickH. S.KilpatrickD. G. (1997). Health impact of interpersonal violence 1: Prevalence rates, case identification, and risk factors for sexual assault, physical assault, and domestic violence in men and women. Behavioral Medicine, 23, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289709596729
2.
ArmstrongE. A.HamiltonL.SweeneyB. (2006). Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems, 53, 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.483
3.
BerdahlJ. L.MooreC. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426
4.
BiernatM.ManisM. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.5
5.
BiernatM.VescioT. K.GreenM. L. (1996). Selective self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1194–1209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1194
6.
BillB.NausP. (1992). The role of humor in the interpretation of sexist incidents. Sex Roles, 27, 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651095
7.
BreidingM. J. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2015.302634
8.
CapobiancoB. M. (2007). Science teachers’ attempts at integrating feminist pedagogy through collaborative action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20120
9.
CozbyP. C. B. (2009). Methods in behavioral research. McGraw Hill.
FitzgeraldL. F.GelfandM. J.DrasgowF. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1704_2
12.
FordT. E.WentzelE. R.LorionJ. (2001). Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.56
IronsideP. M. (2003). New pedagogies for teaching thinking: The lived experiences of students and teachers enacting narrative pedagogy. Journal of Nursing Education, 42, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20031101-09
15.
KoomenW.DijkerA. J. (1997). Ingroup and outgroup stereotypes and selective processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1002
16.
LeskinenE. A.CortinaL. M. (2014). Dimensions of disrespect: Mapping and measuring gender harassment in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313496549
17.
LeskinenE. A.CortinaL. M.KabatD. B. (2011). Gender harassment: Broadening our understanding of sex-based harassment at work. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9241-5
18.
LimS.CortinaL. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.483
19.
LoveA. M.DeckersL. H. (1989). Humor appreciation as a function of sexual, aggressive, and sexist content. Sex Roles, 20, 649–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288077
20.
McLaughlinH.UggenC.BlackstoneA. (2012). Sexual harassment, workplace authority, and the paradox of power. American Sociological Review, 77, 625–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412451728
21.
MoorsA. C.MalleyJ. E.StewartA. J. (2014). My family matters: Gender and perceived support for family commitments and satisfaction in academia among postdocs and faculty in STEMM and non-STEMM fields. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314542343
RothenbergL. E. (2000). Re-thinking privacy: Peeping toms, video voyeurs, and the failure of a criminal law to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in the public space. American University Law Review, 49, 1127–1165.
24.
RyanK. M.KanjorskiJ. (1998). The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes, and relationship aggression in college students. Sex Roles, 38, 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10188689
25.
SchweigertW. A. (2011). Research methods in psychology: A handbook. Waveland Press.
ThomaeM.PinaA. (2015). Sexist humor and social identity: The role of sexist humor in men’s in-group cohesion, sexual harassment, rape proclivity, and victim blame. Humor, 28, 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0023
28.
ThomaeM.TendayiV. (2013). Why did the woman cross the road? The effect of sexist humor on men’s rape proclivity. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 7, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099198
29.
TjadenP. G.ThoennesN. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the national violence against women survey. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1037/e513832006-001
30.
TrigwellK. (2013). Evidence of the impact of scholarship of teaching and learning purposes. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.95
31.
TrigwellK.ProsserM. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers’ approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139219