BrabeckM. M. (2016). Building on the feminist legacy of PWQ. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 7–9. doi:10.1177/0361684315622774
2.
BrabeckM. M. (2018). Feminist writing that matters. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 7–9. doi:10.1177/0361684317748636
3.
FineM.TorreM. E. (2019). Critical participatory action research: A feminist project for validity and solidarity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43, 433–445. doi:10.1177/0361684319865255
4.
HardingS. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity?”The Centennial Review, 36. 437–470. Retrieved fromhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23739232
5.
MarecekJ. (2018, August). A short history of the future: Revisiting Carolyn Sherif’s needed concepts in the study of gender. Carolyn A. Sherif Award Address presented at the 126th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
6.
MarecekJ. (2019). A history of the future: Carolyn Wood Sherif, equitable knowledge, and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43, 422–432. doi:10.1177/0361684319861953
7.
McCormick-HunnK.WarnerL.SettlesI.ShieldsS. (2019). What if psychology took intersectionality seriously? Changing how psychologists think about participants. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43, 445–456. doi:10.1177/0361684319866430
8.
PopliS. (2019). Report on participant diversity in PWQ 1976-2019. Unpublished manuscript, Steinhardt School, New York University, New York, NY.
9.
ShieldsS. A. (2018, August). What if psychology took intersectionality theory seriously?Ernest R. Hilgard Award Address presented at the 126th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
YoderJ. D. (2015). Looking backward and moving forward: Our feminist imperative to do work that matters. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 427–431. doi:10.1177/0361684315601861
