We present critical participatory action research as an enactment of feminist research praxis in psychology. We discuss the key elements of critical participatory action research through the story of a single, national participatory project. The project was designed by and for LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, asexual, plus) and gender-expansive youth; it was called What’s Your Issue? We provide details of the research project, the dreams, desires, experiences, and structural precarity of queer and trans youth. We write this article hoping readers will appreciate the complexities of identities, attend to the relentless commitment to recognition and solidarities, learn the ethical and epistemological principles of critical participatory action research as a feminist and intersectional praxis, and appreciate the provocative blend of research and action toward social justice. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/page/pwq/suppl/index
AhmedS. (2014). Willful subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute.
3.
Boston Women’s Health Collective. (1971). Our bodies, our selves. Boston, MA: New England Free Press.
4.
CahillC. (2007). Doing research with young people. Journal of Children’s Geographies, 5, 297–312. doi:101080/14733280410001720557
5.
ChmielewskiJ.BelmonteK.StoudtB.FineM. (2015). Intersectional inque(e)ries: Participatory research on discipline disparities at the race/sexuality/gender nexus. In SkibaR. J.MedirattaK.RauschM. K. (Eds.), Inequality in school discipline: Research and practice to reduce disparities (pp. 171–188). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
6.
ChomskyN.FoucaultM. (1974). Human nature: Justice versus power. In FonsE. (Ed.), Reflexive water: The basic concerns of mankind (pp. 133–198). London, England: Souvenir Press.
7.
CollinsP. H.BilgeS. (2016). Intersectionality. New York, NY: Polity Press.
8.
Comas-DíazL.GreeneB. (1994). Women of color: Integrating ethnic and gender identities in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
DiamondL. (2009). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
FineM. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29–54. doi:10.17763/haer.58.l.u0468klv2n2n8242
12.
FineM. (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
13.
FineM. (2006). Bearing witness: Methods for researching oppression and resistance. A textbook for critical research methods. Social Justice Research, 19, 83–108. doi:10.1007/11211.1573.6725
14.
FineM.BarrerasR. (2001). To be of use. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 1, 175–182. doi:10.1111/1530-2415.00012
15.
FineM.CrossW. (2016). Critical race, psychology and social policy: Refusing damage, cataloguing oppression, and documenting desire. In AlvarezA.LiangC. T. H.NevilleH. A. (Eds.), The Cost of Racism for People of Color: Contextualizing Experiences of Discrimination (pp. 273–294). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
FineM.TorreM. E.BoudinK.BowenI.ClarkJ.HyltonD.UpeguiD. (2003). Participatory action research: Within and beyond bars. In CamicP.RhodesJ. E.YardleyL. (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 173–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
FineM.TorreM. E.FrostD.CabanaA. (2018). “Radical by necessity, not by choice”: From microaggressions to social activism. In TorinoG.RiveraD.CapodilupoD.NadalK.SueD. (Eds.), Microaggression theory (pp. 244–259). New York, NY: Wiley.
18.
FineM.TorreM. E.FrostD.CabanaA.AvoryS. (2018). Refusing to check the box: Participatory inquiry at the radical rim. In GallagherK. (Ed.), Methodological dilemmas revisited (pp. 11–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
FrostD.FineM.TorreM. E.CabanaA. (2019). Minority stress, activism and health in the context of economic precarity: A National participatory study of LGBTQ youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 63, 511–526. doi:10.1002/ajcp.12326
20.
HalkovicA.FineM.BaeJ.CampbellL.GaryC.GreeneA. C.…TawajiA. (2013). The gifts they bring: Higher education and re-entry. John Jay College, Prisoner Re-entry Institute. Retrieved fromwww.johnjaypri.org
21.
HallR.FineM. (2005). The stories we tell: The lives and friendship of two older black lesbians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 177–187. doi:10.1111/j.1471.6402.2005.000180
22.
HardingS. (1994). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In AlcoffL.PotterE. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
hooksB. (1984). From margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press.
24.
HurtadoA. (2003). Voicing Chicana feminisms: Young women speak out on sexuality and identity. New York: New York University Press.
LanghoutR.ThomasE. (2010). Imagining participation in collaboration with children. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 60–66. doi:10/1007/S10464-015-9711-5
27.
LevittH. M.MotulskyS. L.WertzF. J.MorrowS. L.PonterottoJ. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4, 2–22. doi:10.1037/qup0000082
MaguireP. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Center for International Education.
30.
Martín-BaróI. (1994). Writings for a liberation psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
McClellandS. (2010). Intimate justice: A critical analysis of sexual satisfaction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 663–680.
32.
McClellandS. (2017). The self-anchored ladder in critical feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 451–464. doi:10.1177/0361684317725985
33.
RomeroM.StewartA. (1999) Women’s untold stories. New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
StoudtB. G.FineM.FoxM. (2011). Growing up policed in the age of aggressive policing policies. New York Law School Law Review, 56, 1331–1370.
35.
StoudtB. G.TorreM. E.BartleyP.BracyF.CaldwellH.DownsA.…YatesJ. (2015). Participatory action research and policy change. In DuroseC.RichardsonL. (Eds.), Designing public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change (pp. 125–137). Bristol, England: Policy Press.
36.
TorreM. E. (2009). Participatory action research and critical race theory: Fueling spaces for nos-otras to research. The Urban Review, 41, 106–120. doi:10.1037/e6099822009-001
37.
TorreM. E.AyalaJ. (2009). Envisioning participatory action research Entremundos. Feminism and Psychology, 19, 387–393. doi:10.1177/0959353509105620
38.
TorreM. E.FineM.AlexanderN.BillupsA.BlandingY.GenaoE.…SalahT. (2008). Participatory action research in the contact zone. In CammarotaJ.FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 23–43). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
TorreM. E.FineM.FrostD.CabanaA.Fowler-ChapmanT., & the WYI Research Collective. (2018). Radical wills (and won’ts): Critical participatory inqueery. In TalburtS. (Ed.), Youth sexualities (pp. 169–193). New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
TorreM.FineM.StoudtB.FoxM. (2012). Critical participatory action research as public science. In CamicP.CooperH. (Eds.). The handbook of qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41.
TorreM. E.StoudtB.ManoffE.FineM. (2017). Critical participatory action research on State violence: Bearing wit(h)ness across fault lines of power, privilege and dispossession. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 492–515). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
42.
TuckE. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 409–427. doi:10.17763.haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
