Feminist Identity,Attitudes Toward Feminist Prototypes,and Willingness to Intervene in Everyday Sexist Events

Abstract

Many women eschew the feminist label despite believing in gender equality. In order to effectively promote feminist change, it is important to understand the factors involved in feminist attitudes, identification, and behavior. In the present research, we helped clarify the relations among these factors. In a survey of 428 U.S. women, we found that participants with stronger attitudes toward gender equality and more favorable explicit and implicit attitudes toward feminist prototypes were more likely to claim a feminist label. And those who did so reported greater willingness to intervene when confronted with everyday sexist behavior, particularly if they perceived that they personally were vulnerable to the effects of sexism. We suggest that improving attitudes toward feminist prototypes may help promote feminist identification, and informing women about the pervasiveness of sexism, including their personal vulnerability, may promote willingness to act after the feminist label has been adopted. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/page/pwq/suppl/index

Keywords

feminism sexism implicit attitudes prototypes behavioral willingness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastosopoulos

Desmarais

(2015). By name or by deed? Identifying the source of the feminist stigma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 226–242. doi:10.1111/jasp.12290

Anderson

K. J.

(2015). Modern misogyny: Anti-feminism in a post-feminist era. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Aronson

(2003). Feminists or “postfeminists”? Young women’s attitudes toward feminism and gender relations. Gender and Society, 17, 903–922. doi:10.1177/0891243203257145

Baber

K. M.

Tucker

C. J.

(2006). The Social Roles Questionnaire: A new approach to measuring attitudes toward gender. Sex Roles, 54, 459–467. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9018-y

Bashir

N. Y.

Lockwood

Chasteen

A. L.

Nadolny

Noyes

(2013). The ironic impact of activists: Negative stereotypes reduce social change influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 614–626. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1983

Becker

J. C.

Zawadzki

M. J.

Shields

S. A.

(2014). Confronting and reducing sexism: A call for research on intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 603–614. doi:10.1111/josi.12081

Bollen

K. A.

Noble

M. D.

(2011). Structural equation models and the quantification of behavior. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 108, pp. 15639–15646). doi:10.1073/pnas.1010661108

Brinkman

B. G.

Dean

A. M.

Simpson

C. K.

McGinley

Rosén

L. A.

(2015). Bystander intervention during college women’s experiences of gender prejudice. Sex Roles, 72, 485–498. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0485-x

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

10.

Burleigh

(2014, July 30). Women against womyn: First wave, second wave, third wave, and now three steps back. New York Observer. Retrieved from http://observer.com/2014/07/women-against-womyn-first-wave-second-wave-third-wave-and-now-three-steps-back/

11.

Burn

S. M.

Aboud

Moyles

(2000). The relationship between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex Roles, 42, 1081–1089. doi:10.1023/A:1007044802798

12.

Byrne

(2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203726532

13.

Combahee River Collective. (2015). A Black Feminist Statement. In Moraga

Anzaldúa

(Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (4th ed., pp. 210–218). Albany: SUNY Press. (Original work published 1977)

14.

Crosby

(1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386. doi:10.1177/000276484027003008

15.

Cundiff

J. L.

Zawadzki

M. J.

Danube

C. L.

Shields

S. A.

(2014). Using experiential learning to increase the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful: The WAGES intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 703–721. doi:10.1111/josi.12087

16.

Czopp

A. M.

Monteith

M. J.

Mark

A. Y.

(2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 784. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784

17.

De Houwer

(2006). What are implicit measures and why are we using them. In Wiers

R. W.

Stacy

A. W.

(Eds.), The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 11–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412976237.n2

18.

Dovidio

J. F.

Kawakami

Gaertner

S. L.

(2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62

19.

Downs

J. S.

Holbrook

M. B.

Sheng

Cranor

L. F

. (2010). Are your participants gaming the system? Screening Mechanical Turk workers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ‘10 (pp. 2399–2402). Atlanta, GA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753688

20.

Eisele

Stake

(2008). The differential relationship of feminist attitudes and feminist identity to self-efficacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 233–244. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00432.x

21.

Enns

C. Z.

(1997). Feminist theories and feminist psychotherapies: Origins, themes, and variations. New York, NY: Haworth Press.

22.

Fitz

C. C.

Zucker

A. N.

Bay-Cheng

L. Y.

(2012). Not all non-labelers are created equal: Distinguishing between quasi-feminists and neoliberals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 274–285. doi:10.1177/0361684312451098

23.

Garcia

D. M.

Schmitt

M. T.

Branscombe

N. R.

Ellemers

(2009). Women’s reactions to ingroup members who protest discriminatory treatment: The importance of beliefs about inequality and response appropriateness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 733–745. doi:10.1002/ejsp.644

24.

Gerrard

Gibbons

F. X.

Houlihan

A. E.

Stock

M. L.

Pomery

E. A.

(2008). A dual process approach to health risk decision making: The Prototype-Willingness Model. Developmental Review, 28, 29–61. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.10.001

25.

Gerrard

Gibbons

F. X.

Stock

M. L.

Vande Lune

L. S.

Cleveland

M. J.

(2005). Images of smokers and willingness to smoke among African American pre-adolescents: An application of the prototype/willingness model of adolescent health risk behavior to smoking initiation. Pediatric Psychology, 30, 305–318. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsi026

26.

Gerrits

J. H.

De Ridder

D. T. D.

De Wit

J. B. F.

Kuijer

R. G.

(2009). Cool and independent or foolish and undisciplined? Adolescents’ prototypes of (un)healthy eaters and their association with eating behaviour. Appetite, 53, 407–413. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.08.008

27.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

28.

Greenwald

A. G

Nosek

B. A.

Banaji

M. R.

(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197

29.

Greenwald

A. G.

Poehlman

A. T.

Uhlmann

E. L.

Banaji

M. R.

(2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575

30.

Harnois

C. E.

(2005). Different paths to different feminisms? Bridging multiracial feminist theory and quantitative sociological gender research. Gender and Society, 19, 809–828. doi:10.1177/0891243205280026

31.

Henderson-King

Stewart

A. J.

(1997). Feminist consciousness: Perspectives on women’s experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 415. doi:10.1177/0146167297234007

32.

Henderson-King

Stewart

A. J.

(1999). Educational experiences and shifts in group consciousness: Studying women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 390–399. doi:10.1177/0146167299025003010

33.

Hoskin

R. A.

Jenson

K. E.

Blair

K. L.

(2017). Is our feminism bullshit? The importance of intersectionality in adopting a feminist identity. Cogent Social Sciences, 3, 1–19. doi:10.1080/23311886.2017.1290014

34.

Hurt

M. M.

Nelson

J. A.

Turner

D. L.

Haines

M. E.

Ramsey

L. R.

Erchull

M. J.

Liss

(2007). Feminism: What is it good for? Feminine norms and objectification as the link between feminist identity and clinically relevant outcomes. Sex Roles, 57, 355–363. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9272-7

35.

Kahn

K. B.

Barreto

Kaiser

C. R.

Rego

M. S.

(2015). When do high and low status group members support confrontation? The role of perceived pervasiveness of prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 27–43. doi:10.1111/bjso.12117

36.

Karpinski

Steinman

R. B.

(2006). The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16

37.

Kaysen

Stake

J. E.

(2001). From thought to deed: Understanding abortion activism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 2378–2400. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00181.x

38.

Lang

P. J.

Bradley

Cuthbert

(2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-8). Gainesville: University of Florida.

39.

Leaper

Arias

D. M.

(2011). College women’s feminist identity: A multidimensional analysis with implication for coping with sexism. Sex Roles, 64, 475–490. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9936-1

40.

Lewis

King

Litt

Swanson

Lee

(2016). Examining daily variability in willingness to drink in relation to underage young adult alcohol use. Addictive Behaviors, 61, 62–67. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.019

41.

Mallett

R. K.

Wagner

D. E.

(2011). The unexpectedly positive consequences of confronting sexism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 215–220. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.001

42.

McHugh

M. C.

Frieze

I. H.

(1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes: A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00097.x

43.

Moradi

Subich

L. M.

Phillips

J. C.

(2002). Revisiting feminist identity development theory, research, and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 6–43. doi:10.1177/0011000002301002

44.

Murnen

S. K.

Smolak

(2009). Are feminist women protected from body image problems? A meta-analytic review of relevant research. Sex Roles, 60, 186–197. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9523-2

45.

Nelson

J. A.

Liss

Erchull

M. J.

Hurt

M. M.

Ramsey

L. R.

Turner

D. L.

Haines

M. E.

(2008). Identity in action: Predictors of feminist self-identification and collective action. Sex Roles, 58, 721–728. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9384-0

46.

Nicole

S. J.

Stewart

R. E.

(2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 215–223. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00138.x

47.

Peer

Brandimarte

Samat

Acquisti

(2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006

48.

Ratliff

K. A.

Howell

J. L.

(2015). Implicit prototypes predict risky sun behavior. Health Psychology, 34, 231. doi:10.1037/hea0000117

49.

Ratliff

K. A.

Howell

J. L.

Redford

(2017). Implicit attitudes toward the prototypical environmentalist predict environmentally-friendly behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 132–140. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.009

50.

Redford

Howell

J. L.

Meijs

M. H.

Ratliff

K. A.

(2018). Implicit and explicit evaluations of feminist prototypes predict feminist identity and behavior. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 3–18. doi:10.1177/1368430216630193

51.

Robnett

R. D.

Anderson

K. J.

(2017). Feminist identity among women and men from four ethnic groups. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23, 134–142. doi:10.1037/cdp0000095

52.

Robnett

R. D.

Anderson

K. J.

Hunter

L. E.

(2012). Predicting feminist identity: Associations between gender traditional attitudes, feminist stereotyping, and ethnicity. Sex Roles, 67, 143–157. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0170-2

53.

Rosch

E. H.

(1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0

54.

Saunders

Kashubeck-West

(2006). The relations among feminist identity, gender role orientation, and psychological well-being in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 199–211. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00282.x

55.

Spence

J. T.

Helmreich

R. L.

(1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure the attitudes toward the rights and role of women in contemporary society. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66–67.

56.

Stake

J. E.

(2007). Predictors of change in feminist activism through women’s and gender studies. Sex Roles, 57, 43–54. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9227-z

57.

Swim

J. K.

Eyssell

K. M.

Murdoch

E. Q.

Ferguson

M. J.

(2010). Self-silencing to sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 493–507. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01658.x

58.

Swim

J. K.

Hyers

L. L.

(1999). Excuse me—What did you just say? Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1370

59.

Szymanski

D. M.

(2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51, 145–159. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000037759.33014.55

60.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin

W. G.

Worchel

(Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

61.

Turner

J. C.

Oakes

P. J.

(1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237–252. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x

62.

Williams

Wittig

M. A

. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but…”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between profeminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37, 885–904. doi:10.1007/BF02936345

63.

Yeung

A. W.

Kay

A. C.

Peach

J. M.

(2013). Anti-feminist backlash: The role of system justification in the rejection of feminism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 474–484. doi:10.1177/1368430213514121

64.

Yoder

J. D.

Tobias

Snell

A. F.

(2011). When declaring “I am a feminist” matters: Labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64, 9–18. doi:10.1177/1368430216630193

65.

Zainulbhai

(2016). Strong global support for gender equality, especially among women. Retrieved from Pew Research Center website: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/03/08/strong-global-support-for-gender-equality-especially-among-women/

66.

Zucker

A. N.

(2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, “I’m not a feminist, but….” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 423–435. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x

67.

Zucker

A. N.

Bay-Cheng

L. Y.

(2010). Minding the gap between feminist identity and attitudes: The behavioral and ideological divide between feminists and non-labelers. Journal of Personality, 78, 1895–1924. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00673.x

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.20 MB