In two studies with women living in India (Study 1, n = 177) and African American women in the United States (Study 2, n = 120), we investigated whether skin-tone surveillance, which theoretically is a manifestation of self-objectification, predicted greater skin-color dissatisfaction and greater skin-bleaching behavior. Given the existence of colorism in Indian and American societies, we expected that ideologies that rationalize and perpetuate the status quo would moderate the proposed relations. Results were consistent with objectification theory and system justification theory. The positive relation between skin-tone surveillance and skin-color dissatisfaction was weaker among women of color who more strongly (vs. weakly) endorsed system justifying ideologies, and the positive relation between skin-tone surveillance and skin-bleaching behavior was stronger among women of color who more strongly (vs. weakly) endorsed system justifying ideologies. Our results suggest that self-objectification theorists and researchers should consider culturally specific manifestations of self-objectification as well as protective and legitimating effects of system justifying ideologies. We encourage clinicians and policy makers to use public campaigns and individual-level interventions to target the norms and motivations underlying skin-bleaching. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/page/pwq/suppl/index
AlbertsonE. R.NeffK. D.Dill-ShacklefordK. E. (2015). Self-compassion and body dissatisfaction in women: A randomized controlled trial of a brief meditation intervention. Mindfulness, 6, 444–454. doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0277-3
2.
AllenB. (1982). It ain’t easy being pinky. Essence, 13, 67–128.
3.
AllevaJ. M.MartijnC.Van BreukelenG. J.JansenA.KarosK. (2015). Expand your Horizon: A programme that improves body image and reduces self-objectification by training women to focus on body functionality. Body Image, 15, 81–89. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.07.001
4.
BaileyT. K. M.ChungY. B.WilliamsW. S.SinghA. A.TerrellH. K. (2011). Development and validation of the internalized racial oppression scale for black individuals. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 481–493. doi:10.1037/a0023585
5.
BartkyS. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203825259
6.
BaylyS. (2001). Caste, society and politics in India from the eighteenth century to the modern age. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521264341
7.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057
8.
BirtC. M.DionK. L. (1987). Relative deprivation theory and responses to discrimination in a gay male and lesbian sample. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 139–145. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00774.x
9.
BondS.CashT. F. (1992). Black beauty: Skin color and body images among African-American college Women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 874–888. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00930.x
10.
BreinesJ. G.CrockerJ.GarciaJ. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women’s daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598. doi:10.1177/0146 167207313727
11.
BuchananT. S.FischerA. R.TokarD. M.YoderJ. D. (2008). Testing a culture-specific extension of objectification theory regarding African American women’s body image. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 697–718. doi:10.1177/0011000008316322
12.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
13.
CalogeroR. M. (2012). Objectification theory, self-objectification, and body image. Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance, 2, 574–580. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-384925-0.00091-2
14.
CalogeroR. M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24, 312–318. doi:10.1177/0956797612452574
15.
CalogeroR. M.JostJ. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 211–228. doi:10.1037/a0021864
16.
CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12304-000
17.
CalogeroR. M.TylkaT. L. (2014). Sanctioning resistance to sexual objectification: An integrative system justification perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 763–778. doi:10.1111/josi.12090
18.
CharlesC. (2011). Skin bleaching and the prestige complexion of sexual attraction. Sexuality & Culture, 15, 375–390. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9107-0
19.
ChengH. L.TranA. G.MiyakeE. R.KimH. Y. (2017). Disordered eating among Asian American college women: A racially expanded model of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64, 179–191. doi:10.1037/cou0000195
20.
ChomaB. L.FosterM. D.RadfordE. (2007). Use of objectification theory to examine the effects of a media literacy intervention on women. Sex Roles, 56, 581–590. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9200-x
21.
ChomaB. L.HaferC. L.CrosbyF.FosterM. (2012). Perceptions of personal sex discrimination: The role of belief in a just world and situational ambiguity. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 568–585. doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.667459
22.
ChomaB. L.VisserB. A.PozzebonJ. A.BogaertA. F.BusseriM. A.SadavaS. W. (2010). Self-objectification, self-esteem, and gender: Testing a moderated mediation model. Sex Roles, 63, 645–656. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9829-8
23.
ChouC. P.BentlerP. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 37–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.2307/2988418
24.
ClaudatK.WarrenC. S. (2014). Self-objectification, body self-consciousness during sexual activities, and sexual satisfaction in college women. Body Image, 11, 509–515. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.006
25.
ColemanM. N.ChapmanS.WangD. C. (2012). An examination of color-blind racism and race-related stress among African American undergraduate students. Journal of Black Psychology, 39, 486–504. doi:10.1177/0095798412469226
26.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203900055
27.
CollinsP. H. (2009). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.3395/reciis.v2i2.221en
28.
CorreiaI.DalbertC. (2007). Belief in a just world, justice concerns, and well-being at Portuguese schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 421–437. doi:10.1007/BF03173464
29.
CorrellJ.ParkB.SmithJ. A. (2008). Colorblind and multicultural prejudice reduction strategies in high-conflict situations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 471–491. doi:10.1177/1368430208095401
30.
CoxA. E.Ullrich-FrenchS.ColeA. N.D’Hondt-TaylorM. (2016). The role of state mindfulness during yoga in predicting self-objectification and reasons for exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 321–327. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.10.001
31.
DadzieO. E.PetitA. (2009). Skin bleaching: Highlighting the misuse of cutaneous depigmenting agents. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 23, 741–750. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03150.x
32.
DakanalisA.CarràG.CalogeroR.FidaR.ClericiM.ZanettiM. A.RivaG. (2015). The developmental effects of media-ideal internalization and self-objectification processes on adolescents’ negative body-feelings, dietary restraint, and binge eating. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24, 997–1010. doi:10.1007/s00787-014-0649 -1
33.
DalbertC. (1999). Belief in a just world, well-being and coping with an unjust fate. In MontadaL.LernerM. (Eds.), Responses to victimization and belief in the just world (pp. 87–105). New York, NY: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-6418-56
34.
DalbertC. (2009). Belief in a just world. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 288–297). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
DalbertC.FischU.MontadaL. (1992). Is inequality unjust? Evaluating women’s career chances. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 42, 11–17.
36.
DansbyP. G. (1980). Black pride in the seventies: Fact or fantasy. In JonesR. (Eds.), Black Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 69–80). New York, NY: Harper.
37.
DavidE. J. R.OkazakiS. (2006). Colonial mentality: A review and recommendation for Filipino American psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 12, 1–16. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.12.1.1
38.
DavidE. J. R.OkazakiS. (2010). Activation and automaticity of colonial mentality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 850–887. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00601.x
39.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40.
EnglerD. E. (2005). Mercury “bleaching” creams. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 52, 1113–1114. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.01.136
41.
FalconerJ. W.NevilleH. A. (2000). African American college women’s body image: An examination of body mass, African self-consciousness, and skin color satisfaction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 236–243. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00205.x
42.
FardoulyJ.DiedrichsP. C.VartanianL. R.HalliwellE. (2015). The mediating role of appearance comparisons in the relationship between media usage and self-objectification in young women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 447–457. doi:10.1177/0361684315581841
43.
FatimaI.SuhailK. (2010). Belief in a just world and subjective well-being: Mothers of normal and Down syndrome children. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 461–468. doi:10.1080/00207591003774519
44.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Sage.
45.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
46.
FrisbyC. M.AubreyJ. S. (2012). Race and genre in the use of sexual objectification in female artists’ music videos. Howard Journal of Communications, 23, 66–87. doi:10.1080/10646175.2012.641880
47.
FurnhamA. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00072-7
48.
FurnhamA.ProcterE. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 365–384. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00880.x
GlennE. N. (2008). Yearning for lightness: Transnational circuits in the marketing and consumption of skin lighteners. Gender & Society, 22, 281–302. doi:10.1177/0891243208316089
51.
HainesM. E.ErchullM. J.LissM.TurnerD. L.NelsonJ. A.RamseyL. R.HurtM. M. (2008). Predictors and effects of self-objectification in lesbians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 181–187. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00422.x
52.
HallR. (1995). The bleaching syndrome: African Americans’ response to cultural domination vis-à-vis skin color. Journal of Black Studies, 26, 172–184. doi:10/1177/002193479502600205
53.
HaferC. L.ChomaB. L. (2009). The belief in a just word and justification of the status quo. In JostJ. T.KayA. C.ThorisdottirH. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780195320916.003.005
54.
HaferC. L.SuttonR. M. (2016). Belief in a just world. In SabbaghC.SchmittM. (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_8
55.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. doi:10.1111/jedm.12050
56.
HenryF.TatorC. (2010). The colour of democracy: Racism in Canadian society. Toronto, Canada: Nelson Education.
57.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.…StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. doi:10.1037/pspi0000033
58.
HunterM. (2002). “If you’re light you’re alright”: Light skin color as social capital for women of color. Gender & Society, 16, 175–193. doi:10.1177/08912430222104895
59.
HunterM. L. (2011). Buying racial capital: Skin-bleaching and cosmetic surgery in a globalized world. Journal of Pan African Studies, 4, 142–162.
60.
HutchesonG. D.SofroniouN. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Sage. doi:10.4135/9780857028075
61.
JonesB. A.GriffithsK. M. (2015). Self-objectification and depression: An integrative systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 171, 22–32. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.011
62.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
63.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
64.
JostJ. T.BurgessD. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305. doi:10.1177/0146167200265003
65.
JostJ.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
66.
JostJ. T.KayA. C.ThorisdottirH. (2009). Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780195320916.001.0001
67.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
68.
KahnK.HoA. K.SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2009). The space between us and them: Perceptions of status differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 591–604. doi:10.1177/1368430209338716
69.
KarsayK.MatthesJ. (2016). Sexually objectifying pop music videos, young women’s self-objectification, and selective exposure: A moderated mediation model. Communication Research, 1–23. doi:10.1177/0093650216661434
70.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and” poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
71.
KeithV. M.HerringC. (1991). Skin tone and stratification in the Black community. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 760–778. doi:10.1086/229819
72.
KendallF. E. (2012). Understanding white privilege: Creating pathways to authentic relationships across race (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203114162
73.
KilbourneJ. (2002). Killing us softly 3: Advertising’s image of women[documentary]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.
74.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
75.
LernerM. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x
76.
LernerM. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5_2
77.
LewisK. M.RobkinN.GaskaK.NjokiL. C. (2011). Investigating motivations for women’s skin bleaching in Tanzania. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 29–37. doi:10.1177/0361684310392356
78.
LipkusI. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1171–1178. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90081-L
79.
LipkusI. M.DalbertC.SieglerI. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677. doi:10.1177/0146167296227002
80.
MarshallJ. (2012). A mixed method examination of racial disproportionalities among youth who cross over from the child welfare to the juvenile justice system: Child welfare and juvenile justice professionals’ perspectives and racial attitudes (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana–Champaign, IL. Retrieved from ProQuest (3633382).
81.
MaxwellM.BrevardJ.AbramsJ.BelgraveF. (2015). What’s color got to do with it? Skin color, skin color satisfaction, racial identity, and internalized racism among African American college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 41, 438–461. doi:10.1177/0095798414542299
82.
McKinleyN. M. (2011). Feminist consciousness and objectified body consciousness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 684–688. doi:10.1177/0361684311428137
83.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x
84.
MoradiB. (2011). Objectification theory: Areas of promise and refinement. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 153–163. doi:10.1177/0011000010384279
85.
MoradiB.HuangY. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
86.
MoradiB.RottensteinA. (2007). Objectification theory and deaf cultural identity attitudes: Roles in deaf women’s eating disorder symptomatology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 178–188. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.2.178
87.
MorryM. M.StaskaS. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 269. doi:10.1037/h0087148
88.
NealA. M. (1998). The influence of skin color and facial features on perceptions of Black female physical attractiveness (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).DePaul University, Chicago, IL.
89.
NevilleH. A.LillyR. L.DuranG.LeeR. M.BrowneL. (2000). Construction and initial validation of the color-blind racial attitudes scale (CoBRAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 59–70. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.59
90.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.
91.
OkazakiS.DavidE. J. R.AbelmannN. (2008). Colonialism and psychology of culture. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 90–106. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00046.x
92.
OnraetE.Van HielA.DhontK. (2013). The relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and psychology well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 509–522. doi:10.1177/01461673478199
93.
PandeyG. (2013). A history of prejudice: Race, caste, and difference in India and the United States. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139237376
94.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
95.
ParentM. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychology, 41, 568–600. doi:10.1177/0011000012445176
96.
PeltzerK.PengpidS.JamesC. (2016). The globalization of whitening: Prevalence of skin lighteners (or bleachers) use and its social correlates among university students in 26 countries. International Journal of Dermatology, 55, 165–172. doi:10.1111/ijd.12860
97.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
98.
RubinZ.PeplauA. (1975). Belief in a just world and reactions to another’s lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 73–93.
99.
SchreiberJ. B.NoraA.StageF. K.BarlowE. A.KingJ. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
100.
ShapiroD. N.ChandlerJ.MuellerP. A. (2013). Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 213–220. doi:10.1177/2167702612469015
101.
SidaniusJ.CotterillS.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.KteilyN.CarvachoH. (2017). Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
102.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CB09781139175043
103.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.van LaarC.LevinS. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and methods. Political Psychology, 25, 845–880. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x
104.
SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2015). Media exposure, extracurricular activities, and appearance-related comments as predictors of female adolescents’ self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 375–389. doi:10.1177/0361684314554606
105.
StankiewiczJ. M.RosselliF. (2008). Women as sex objects and victims in print advertisements. Sex Roles, 58, 579–589. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9359 -1
106.
TiggemannM.WilliamsE. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 66–75. doi:10.1177/0361684311420250
107.
TolaymatL. D.MoradiB. (2011). US Muslim women and body image: Links among objectification theory constructs and the hijab. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 383–392. doi:10.1037/a0023461
108.
TownsendT. G.ThomasA. J.NeilandsT. B.JacksonT. R. (2010). I’m no Jezebel; I am young, gifted, and Black: Identity, sexuality, and Black girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 273–285. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01574.x
109.
VandenboschL.MuiseA.EggermontS.ImpettE. A. (2015). Sexualizing reality television: Associations with trait and state self-objectification. Body Image, 13, 62–66. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.01.003
110.
VelezB. L.MoradiB.DeBlaereC. (2015). Multiple oppressions and the mental health of sexual minority Latina/o individuals. The Counseling Psychologist, 43, 7–38. doi:10.1177/0011000014542836
111.
WallaceS. A.TownsendT. G.GlasgowY. M.OjieM. J. (2011). Gold diggers, video vixens, and jezebels: Stereotype images and substance use among urban African American girls. Journal of Women’s Health, 20, 1315–1324. doi:10.1089/jwh.2010.2223
112.
WatsonL. B.GrotewielM.FarrellM.MarshikJ.SchneiderM. (2015). Experiences of sexual objectification, minority stress, and disordered eating among sexual minority women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 458–470. doi:10.1177/0361684315575024
113.
WatsonL. B.RobinsonD.DispenzaF.NazariN. (2012). African American women’s sexual objectification experiences a qualitative study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 458–475. doi:10.1177/0361684312454724
114.
WeitzR. (2004). Rapunzel’s daughters: What women’s hair tells us about women’s lives. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
115.
WolfN. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York, NY: Anchor Book.
116.
WorthingtonR. L.WhittakerT. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838. doi:10.1177/0011000006288127
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
