AnzaiS.PaikC. M. (2012). Factors influencing Japanese women to choose two-year colleges in Japan. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36, 614–625. doi:10.1080/1066892093182559
2.
ElyR. J.IbarraH.KolbD. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 474–493. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0046
3.
IversJ. J. (2012). Is the great American teacher dead? Principles to resurrect meaningful, effective, and consciousness raising instruction. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 18, 49–56. https://www.invitationaleducation.net/publications/journal/
4.
IversJ. J., Sr.IversJ. J., Jr.IversN. N. (2008). Cross-cultural instruction, consciousness raising, and inviting heightened self-esteem. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 14, 11–23. https://www.invitationaleducation.net/publications/journal/
5.
KawanoK. (2011). Consciousness raising activities and Japanese women’s psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 21, 503–509. doi:10.1177/0959353511422693
6.
LachkarJ. (2014). The rising power of Japanese women: A pop culture revolution. The Journal of Psychohistory, 41, 301–308. doi:10.1177/0959353513503984
7.
SowardsS. K.RenegarV. R. (2004). The rhetorical functions of consciousness-raising in third wave feminism. Communication Studies, 55, 535–552. doi:10.1080/10510970409388637
8.
StewartA. J.LalJ.McGuireK. (2011). Expanding the archives of global feminisms: Narratives of feminism and activism. Signs, 36, 889–914. doi:10.1086/658683
9.
SugiharaY.KatsuradaE. (2002). Gender role development in Japanese culture: Diminishing gender role differences in contemporary society. Sex Roles, 47, 443–452. doi:10.1023/A:1021648426787
10.
UsuiC.RoseS.KageyamaR. (2003). Women, institutions, and leadership in Japan. Asian Perspective, 27, 85–123. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/42704422
YamamotoM.RanW. (2014). Should men work outside and women stay home? Revisiting the cultivation of gender-role attitudes in Japan. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 920–942. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.860989