Both traditional gender roles and traditional heterosexual scripts outline sexual roles for women that center on sexual passivity, prioritizing others’ needs, and self-silencing. Acceptance of these roles is associated with diminished sexual agency. Because mainstream media are a prominent source of traditional gender portrayals, we hypothesized that media use would be associated with diminished sexual agency for women, as a consequence of the traditional sexual roles conveyed. We modeled the relations among television (TV) use, acceptance of gendered sexual scripts, and sexual agency (sexual assertiveness, condom use self-efficacy, and sexual shame) in 415 sexually active undergraduate women. As expected, both TV exposure and perceived realism of TV content were associated with greater endorsement of gendered sexual scripts, which in turn were associated with lower sexual agency. Endorsement of gendered sexual scripts fully mediated the relation between TV use and sexual agency. Results suggest that endorsement of traditional gender roles and sexual scripts may be an important predictor of college women’s sexual agency. Interventions targeting women’s sexual health should focus on encouraging media literacy and dismantling gender stereotypic heterosexual scripts. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/page/pwq/suppl/index.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
2.
ArakawaD. R.FlandersC. E.HatfieldE.HeckR. (2013). Positive psychology: What impact has it had on sex research publication trends?Sexuality & Culture, 17, 305–320. doi:10.1007/s12119-012-9152-3
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.5.469
4.
AubreyJ. S. (2004). Sex and punishment: An examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming. Sex Roles, 50, 505–514. doi:10.1023/b:sers.0000023070.87195.07
5.
AubreyJ. S. (2007). Does television exposure influence college-aged women’s sexual self-concept?Media Psychology, 10, 157–181. doi:10.1023/b:sers.0000023070.87195.07
6.
BanduraA. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 121–153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Bay-ChengL. Y. (2010). Justifying sex: The place of women’s sexuality on a social justice agenda. Practice Issues and Social Change, 91, 97–103. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.3962
8.
Bay-ChengL. Y.ZuckerA. N. (2007). Feminism between the sheets: Sexual attitudes among feminists, nonfeminists, and egalitarians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 157–163. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00349.x
9.
BondB. J.DrogosK. L. (2014). Sex on the Shore: Wishful identification and parasocial relationships as mediators in the relationship between Jersey Shore exposure and emerging adults’ sexual attitudes and behaviors. Media Psychology, 17, 102–126. doi:10.1080/15213269.2013.872039
10.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
11.
CaronS. L.DavisC. M.HaltemanW. A.StickleM. (1993). Predictors of condom-related behaviors among first-year college students. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 252–259. doi:10.1080/00224499309551709
12.
ChoH. C.AbeS. (2013). Is two-tailed testing for directional research hypotheses tests legitimate?Journal of Business Research, 66, 1261–1266. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.023
13.
ChuJ. Y.PorcheM. V.TolmanD. L. (2005). The adolescent masculinity ideology in relationships scale: Development and validation of a new measure for boys. Men and Masculinities, 8, 93–115. doi:10.1177/1097184x03257453
CookC. (2012). “Nice girls don’t”: Women and the condom conundrum. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2, 535–543. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03879.x
16.
CoyneS. M.Padilla-WalkerL. M.HowardE. (2013). Emerging in a digital world: A decade review of media use, effects, and gratifications in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 125–137. doi:10.1177/2167696813479782
17.
CurtinN.WardL. M.MerriwetherA.CaruthersA. (2011). Femininity ideology and sexual health in young women: A focus on sexual knowledge, embodiment, and agency. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23, 48–62. doi:10.1080/19317611.2010.524694
18.
FahsB. (2014). “Freedom to” and “freedom from”: A new vision for sex-positive politics. Sexualities, 17, 267–290. doi:10.1177/1363460713516334
19.
FerrisA. L.SmithS. W.GreenbergB. S.SmithS. L. (2007). The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of Communication, 57, 490–510. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00354.x
20.
FetterolfJ. C.SanchezD. T. (2015). The costs and benefits of perceived sexual agency for men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 961–970. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0408-x
21.
FielderR. L.CareyK. B.CareyM. P. (2013). Are hookups replacing romantic relationships? A longitudinal study of first-year female college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 657–659. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.001
22.
FineM. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29–54. doi:10.17763/haer.58.1.u0468k1v2n2n8242
23.
FisherD. A.HillD. L.GrubeJ. W.GruberE. L. (2004). Sex on American television: An analysis across program genres and network types. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 529–553. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4804_1
24.
FlynnM. A.ParkS. Y.MorinD. T.StanaA. (2015). Anything but real: Body idealization and objectification of MTV docusoap characters. Sex Roles, 72, 173–182. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0464-2
25.
FogelJ.KingK. (2014). Perceived realism and Twitter use are associated with increased acceptance of cosmetic surgery among those watching reality television cosmetic surgery programs. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 134, 233–238. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000000322
26.
GalambosN.PetersenA.RichardsM.GitelsonI. (1985). The attitudes toward women scale for adolescents: A study of reliability and validity. Sex Roles, 13, 343–356. doi:10.1007/bf00288090
27.
GiaccardiS.WardL. M.SeabrookR. C.ManagoA.LippmanJ. (2016). Media and modern manhood: Testing associations between media consumption and young men’s acceptance of traditional gender ideologies. Sex Roles, 75, 151–163. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0588-z
28.
GillR. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10, 147–166. doi:10.1177/1367549407075898
29.
GreeneK.FaulknerS. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53, 239–251. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6
30.
GuoW.NathansonA. I. (2011). The effects of parental mediation of sexual content on the sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of adolescents in the U.S. Journal of Children and Media, 5, 358–378. doi:10.1080/17482798.2011.587141
31.
HallA. (2009). Perceptions of media realism and reality TV. In NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 423–438). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
HigginsJ. A.HoffmanS.DworkinS. L. (2010). Rethinking gender, heterosexual men, and women’s vulnerability to HIV/AIDS. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 435–445. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.159723
33.
HorneS.Zimmer-GembeckM. J. (2006). The female sexual subjectivity inventory: Development and validation of a multidimensional inventory for late adolescents and emerging adults. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 125–138. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00276.x
34.
HurlbertD. F. (1998). Hurlbert index of sexual assertiveness. In DavisC. M.YarberW. L.BausermanR.ShreerG. E.DavisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (p. 78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
HynieM.LydonJ. E. (1995). Women’s perceptions of female contraceptive behavior: Experimental evidence of the sexual double standard. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 563–581. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00093.x
36.
ImpettE. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 129–142. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0
37.
KimJ. L.SorsoliC. L.CollinsK.ZylbergoldB. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145–157. doi:10.1080/00224490701263660
38.
KirschA. C.MurnenS. K. (2015). “Hot” girls and “cool dudes”: Examining the prevalence of the heterosexual script in American children’s television media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4, 18–30. doi:10.1037/ppm0000017
39.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
LeichliterJ. S.ChandraA.LiddonN.FentonK. A.AralS. O. (2007). Prevalence and correlates of heterosexual anal and oral sex in adolescents and adults in the United States. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 196, 1852–1859. doi:10.1086/522867
41.
LevinD. S.WardL. M.NeilsonE. C. (2012). Formative sexual communications, sexual agency and coercion, and youth sexual health. Social Service Review, 86, 487–516. doi:10.1086/667785
42.
LippmanJ. R.WardL. M.SeabrookR. C. (2014). Isn’t it romantic? Differential associations between romantic screen media genres and romantic beliefs. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3, 128–140. doi:10.1037/ppm0000034
43.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1
44.
LivingstonJ. A.Bay-ChengL. Y.HequembourgA. L.TestaM.DownsJ. S. (2013). Mixed drinks and mixed messages: Adolescent girls’ perspectives on alcohol and sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 38–50. doi:10.1177/0361684312464202
45.
MahalikJ.MorrayE.Coonerty-FemianoA.LudlowL.SlatteryS.SmilerA. (2005). Development of the conformity to feminine norms inventory. Sex Roles, 52, 417–435. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01545.x
46.
ManagoA. M.WardL. M.LemmK.ReedL.SeabrookR. (2015). Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Sex Roles, 72, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0441-1
47.
MartinoS. C.CollinsR. L.KanouseD. E.ElliottM.BerryS. H. (2005). Social cognitive processes mediating the relationship between exposure to television’s sexual content and adolescents’ sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 914–924. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.914
48.
McNairR. (2005). Risks and prevention of sexually transmissible infections among women who have sex with women. Sexual Health, 2, 209–217. doi:10.1071/SH04046
49.
MooreN. B.DavidsonJ. K.Sr. (1997). Guilt about first intercourse: An antecedent of sexual dissatisfaction among college women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 23, 29–46. doi:10.1080/00926239708404415
50.
MoranC.LeeC. (2014). Women’s constructions of heterosexual non-romantic sex and the implications for sexual health. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 161–182. doi:10.1080/19419899.2012.715588
51.
MouilsoE. R.FischerS. (2012). A prospective study of sexual assault and alcohol use among first-year college women. Violence and Victims, 27, 78–94. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.27.1.78
O’HaraR. E.CooperM. L. (2015). Bidirectional associations between alcohol use and sexual risk-taking behavior from adolescence into young adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 857–871. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0510-8
54.
ParentM. C.MoradiB. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of the conformity to masculine norms inventory and development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory-46. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 175–189. doi:10.1037/a0015481
55.
PotterW. J. (1986). Perceived reality and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30, 159–174. doi:10.1080/08838158609386617
RivadeneyraR.WardL. M. (2005). From Ally McBeal to Sabado Gigante: Contributions of television viewing to the gender role attitudes of Latino adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 453–475. doi:10.1177/0743558405274871
58.
RosenthalD.MooreS.FlynnI. (1991). Adolescent self-efficacy, self-esteem and sexual risk-taking. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 1, 77–88. doi:10.1002/casp.2450010203
59.
RubinA. M. (1981). An examination of television viewing motives. Communication Research, 8, 141–165. doi:10.1177/009365028100800201
60.
SanchezD. T.KieferA. K.YbarraO. (2006). Sexual submissiveness in women: Costs for sexual autonomy and arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 512–524. doi:10.1177/0146167205282154
61.
SchoolerD.WardL. M.MerriwetherA.CaruthersA. (2004). Who’s that girl: Television’s role in the body image development of young white and black women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 38–47. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00121.x
62.
SeabrookR. C.WardL. M.ReedL.ManagoA.GiaccardiS.LippmanJ. R. (2016). Our scripted sexuality: The development and validation of a measure of the heterosexual script and its relation to television consumption. Emerging Adulthood, Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2167696815623686
63.
SignorellaM. L.BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (1993). Developmental differences in children’s gender schemata about others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 13, 147–183. doi:10.1006/drev.1993.1007
64.
SignorielliN. (2001). Television’s gender role images and contribution to stereotyping: Past, present, future. In SingerD.SingerJ. (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 341–358). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
SimonW.GagnonJ. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. doi:10.1007/bf01542219
66.
StappenbeckC. A.NorrisJ.KiekelP. A.MorrisonD. M.GeorgeW. H.DavisK. C.…AbdallahD. A. (2013). Patterns of alcohol use and expectancies predict sexual risk taking among non-problem drinking women. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 74, 223–232. doi:10.15288/jsad.2013.74.223
67.
StoneN.HatherallB.InghamR.McEachranJ. (2006). Oral sex and condom use among young people in the United Kingdom. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 6–12. doi:10.1363/psrh.38.006.06
68.
TolmanD. L. (2002). Female adolescent sexuality: An argument for a developmental perspective on the new view of women’s sexual problems. Women & Therapy, 24, 195–209. doi:10.1300/j015v24n01_21
69.
TolmanD. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66, 746–757. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x
70.
TolmanD. L.AndersonS. M.BelmonteK. (2015). Mobilizing metaphor: Considering complexities, contradictions, and contexts in adolescent girls’ and young women’s sexual agency. Sex Roles, 73, 298–310. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0510-0
71.
TolmanD. L.KimJ. L.SchoolerD.SorsoliC. L. (2007). Rethinking the associations between television viewing and adolescent sexuality development: Bringing gender into focus. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 84.e9–84.e16. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.08.002
72.
TolmanD.PorcheM. (2000). The adolescent femininity ideology scale: Development and validation of a new measure for girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 365–376. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00219.x
73.
TolmanD. L.StriepeM. I.HarmonT. (2003). Gender matters: Constructing a model of adolescent sexual health. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 4–12. doi:10.1080/00224490309552162
74.
TrothA.PetersonC. C. (2000). Factors predicting safe-sex talk and condom use in early sexual relationships. Health Communication, 12, 195–218. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1202_5
75.
VandenboschL.MuiseA.ImpettE.EggermontS. (2015). Sexualizing reality television: Associations with trait and state self-objectification. Body Image, 13, 62–66. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.01.003
76.
WardL. M. (1995). Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 595–615. doi:10.1007/bf01537058
77.
WardL. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 1–15. doi:10.1023/A:1014068031532
78.
WardL. M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347–388. doi:10.1016/s0273-2297(03)00013-3
79.
WardL. M.EpsteinM.CaruthersA.MerriwetherA. (2011). Men’s media use, sexual cognitions, and sexual risk behavior: Testing a mediational model. Developmental Psychology, 47, 592–602. doi:10.1080/02674659808406559
80.
WardL. M.FriedmanK. (2006). Using TV as a guide: Associations between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 133–156. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00125.x
81.
WardL. M.MerriwetherA.CaruthersA. (2006). Breasts are for men: Media, masculinity ideologies, and men’s beliefs about women’s bodies. Sex Roles, 55, 703–714. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9125-9
82.
WardL. M.ReedL.TrinhS.FoustM. (2013). Sexuality and entertainment media. In TolmanD.DiamondL. M. (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Volume 2: Contextual approaches (pp. 373–423). Washington, DC: APA.
83.
WardL. M.RivadeneyraR. (1999). Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 237–249. doi:10.1080/00224499909551994
84.
WardL. M.SeabrookR. C.ManagoA.ReedL. (2016). Contributions of diverse media to self-sexualization among undergraduate women and men. Sex Roles, 74, 12–23. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0548-z
85.
WaymentH. A.AronsonB. (2002). Risky sexual behavior in American white college women: The role of sex guilt and sexual abuse. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 723–733. doi:10.1177/1359105302007006876
86.
WidmanL.WelshD. P.McNultyJ. K.LittleK. C. (2006). Sexual communication and contraceptive use in adolescent dating couples. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 893–899. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.06.003
87.
World Health Organization. (2006). Defining sexual health: Report of a technical consultation on sexual health 28-31 January 2002. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
88.
WrightP. J. (2011). Mass media effects on youth sexual behavior: Assessing the claim for causality. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35, 343–386. doi:10.1080/23808985.2011.11679121
89.
YoderJ. D.PerryR. L.SaalE. I. (2007). What good is a feminist identity? Women’s feminist identification and role expectations for intimate and sexual relationships. Sex Roles, 57, 365–372. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9269-2
90.
ZurbriggenE. L.MorganE. M. (2006). Who wants to marry a millionaire? Reality dating television programs, attitudes towards sex, and sexual behaviors. Sex Roles, 54, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-8865-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
