Feminists have seen profound changes in psychology both in the amount of research on women and gender and in the inclusion of women and others who have been underrepresented in psychology faculties. But beyond promoting those changes, what does it mean to be a feminist psychologist? Here, I discuss ways in which grounding my work in feminism has led to emotional reactions that have fueled my research but also, at times, been depleting. Researchers’ emotions have typically been thought of as contaminants to their work, but I suggest that they may be a critical part of our practice and should be acknowledged and explored. Reflecting on my own emotional reactions to doing research on violence against women has led me to recommend two ways to work for social justice: by changing the narrative about social problems and by working with advocates to do research that is useful to bring about change.
AlexanderJ. G.de ChesnayM.MarshallE.CampbellA. R.JohnsonS.WrightR. (1989). Research note: Parallel reactions in rape victims and rape researchers. Violence and Victims, 4, 57–62.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2014, 10). How is the gender composition of faculty in graduate psychology departments changing?APA Monitor: News from APA’s Center for Workforce Studies. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/10/datapoint.aspx
3.
ArnoldG.AkeJ. (2013). Reframing the narrative of the battered women’s movement. Violence Against Women, 19, 557–578. doi:10.1177/1077801213490508
4.
BabcockJ. C.GreenC. E.RobieC. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001
5.
BlomleyN. K. (1994). Activism and the academy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 383–385. Reprinted inBauderH.Engel Di MauroS., Critical geographies: A collection of readings. Retrieved from Praxis (e)Press: http://www.praxis-epress.org/availablebooks/introcriticalgeog.html
6.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
7.
CampbellR. (2002). Emotionally involved: The impact of researching rape. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
8.
CarvalhoI.LewisD. (2003). Beyond community: Reactions to crime and disorder among inner-city residents. Criminology, 41, 779–812. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01004.x
9.
CeciS. J.GintherD. K.KahnS.WilliamsW. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15, 75–141. doi:10.1177/1529100614541236
10.
ColesJ.AstburyJ.DartnallE.LimjerwalaS. (2014). A qualitative exploration of researcher trauma and researchers’ responses to investigating sexual violence. Violence against Women, 20, 95–117. doi:10.1177/1077801213520578
11.
CollinsP. H. (2013). Truth-telling and intellectual activism. Contexts, 12, 36–39. doi:10.1177/1536504213476244
12.
CunradiC. B.CaetanoR.SchaferJ. (2002). Socioeconomic predictors of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic Couples in the United States. Journal of Family Violence, 17, 377–389. doi:10.1023/A:1020374617328
DenmarkF.RussoN. F.FriezeI. H.SechzerJ. A. (1988). Guidelines for avoiding sexism in psychological research: A report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Nonsexist Research. American Psychologist, 43, 582–585. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.7.582
15.
Dickson-SwiftV.JamesE. L.KippenS.LiamputtongP. (2009). Researching sensitive topics: Qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research, 9, 61–79. doi:10.1177/1468794108098031
16.
EaglyA. H. (2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance?Journal of Social Issues, 72, 199–222. doi:10.1111/josi.12163
17.
EaglyA. H.EatonA.RoseS. M.RigerS.McHughM. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology: Analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67, 211–230. doi:10.1037/a0027260
18.
EaglyA. H.RigerS. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69, 685–702. doi:10.1037/a0037372
19.
FonowM. M.CookJ. A. (1991). Back to the future: A look at the second wave of feminist epistemology and methodology. In FonowM. M.CookJ. A. (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 1–15). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
GeraciL.BalsisS.BuschA. J. B. (2015). Gender and the h index in psychology. Scientometrics, 105, 2023–2034. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1757-5
22.
GilbertL. A. (1998). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. Feminism & Psychology, 8, 77–83. doi:10.1177/0959353598081006
23.
GordonM. R.RigerS. (1989). The female fear. New York, NY: The Free Press.
24.
GriffinS. (1971). Rape: The all-American crime. Ramparts Magazine, 10, 26–35.
25.
Hare-MustinR. T.MarecekJ. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist, 43, 455–464. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.6.455
26.
HeilmanM. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. doi:10.1016/j.rio.2012.11.003
27.
HubbardG.Backett-MilburnK.KemmerD. (2001). Working with emotion: Issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4, 119–137. doi:10.1080/13645570116992
28.
JaggarA. (1989). Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In JaggarA.BordoS. R. (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge (pp. 145–171). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Moran-EllisJ. (1996). Close to home: The experience of researching child sexual abuse. In HesterM.KellyL.RadfordJ. (Eds.), Women, violence and male power (pp. 176–197). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
34.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2015). Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: 2014 (Special Report NSF 16-300). Retrieved fromwww.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsf16300/data-tables.cfm
35.
RegerJ. (2001). Emotions, objectivity and voice: An analysis of a “failed” participant observation. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24, 605–616. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(01)00190-X
36.
RigerS. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist, 47, 730–740. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.6.730
37.
RigerS. (1993). What’s wrong with empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292. doi:10.1007/BF00941504
38.
RigerS. (1994). Challenges of success: Stages of growth in feminist organizations. Feminist Studies, 20, 275–300.
39.
RigerS. (1999). Working together: Challenges in collaborative research on violence against women. Violence Against Women, 5, 1099–1117. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01071.x
40.
RigerS.BennettL. W.SigurvinsdottirR. (2014). Barriers to addressing substance abuse in domestic violence court. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53, 208–217. doi:10.1007/s10464-014-9636-4
41.
RigerS.BennettL.WascoS. M.ScheweP. A.FrohmannL.CamachoJ. M.CampbellR. (2002). Evaluating services for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
RigerS.GalliganP. (1980). Women in management: An exploration of competing paradigms. American Psychologist, 35, 902–910. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.10.902
RigerS.GordonM. T. (1981). The fear of rape: A study in social control. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 71–92. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01071.x
45.
RigerS.GordonM. T.LeBaillyR. (1978). Women’s fear of crime: From blaming to restricting the victim. Victimology, 3, 285–296.
46.
RigerS.RajaS.CamachoJ. (2002). The radiating impact of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 184–205. doi:10.1177/0886260502017002005
47.
RiversC.BarnettR. C. (2013). The new soft war on women: How the myth of female ascendance is hurting women, men—and our economy. New York, NY: Penguin.
48.
SaakvitneK. W.PearlmanL. A., & The Staff of the Traumatic Stress Institute (1996). Transforming the pain: A workbook on vicarious traumatization. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
SherifC. (1979). Bias in psychology. In ShermanJ. A.BeckE. T. (Eds.), The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 93–133). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
51.
StankoE. (1997). “I second that emotion”: Reflections on feminism, emotionality, and research on sexual violence. In SchwartzM. D. (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women: Methodological and personal perspectives (pp. 74–85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
WarrD. J. (2004). Stories in the flesh and voices in the head: Reflections on the content and impact of research with disadvantaged populations. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 578–587. doi:10.1177/1049732303260449
53.
WattsJ. H. (2008). Emotion, empathy and exit: Reflections on doing ethnographic qualitative research on sensitive topics. Medical Sociology Online, 3, 3–14.
54.
WoolleyH. T. (1910). Psychological literature: A review of the recent literature on the psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 7, 335–342. doi:10.1037/h006633845
