BernardP.GervaisS. J.AllenJ.DelméeA.KleinO. (2015). Form sex objects to human beings: Masking sexual body parts and humanization as moderators of women’s objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 432–446.
3.
EngelnR. (2015, 315). The problem with “fat talk.”New York Times Sunday Review, p. SR12.
4.
EnnsC. Z.WilliamsE. N.FassingerR. E. (2013). Feminist multicultural psychology: Evolution, change, and challenge. In AltmaierE. M.HansenJ. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of feminist multicultural counseling psychology (pp. 3–26). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
6.
GrabeS.GroseR. G.DuttA. (2015). Women’s land ownership and relationship power: A mixed methods approach to understanding structural inequities and violence against women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 7–19.
Moss-RacusinC. A.MolendaA. K.CramerC. R. (2015). Can evidence impact attitudes? Public reactions to evidence of gender bias in STEM fields. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 194–209.
10.
RamseyL. R.HoytT. (2015). The object of desire: How being objectified creates sexual pressure for women in heterosexual relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 151–170.
11.
StakeJ. E. (2005). Psychology of women quarterly: Carrying on the traditions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 1–2.
12.
YoderJ. D. (2010). Editorial: A feminist journal at the cutting edge of a psychology for women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 1–4.
13.
YoderJ. D.FischerA. R.KahnA. S.GrodenJ. (2007). Changes in students’ explanations for gender differences after taking a psychology of women class: More constructionist and less essentialist. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 415–425.