In this qualitative study, I offer a feminist reflection on motherhood from the perspectives of 25 women with various types of physical and sensory disabilities. Disability was treated not only as an individual experience but also as a social construct. I conducted 25 non-standardised narrative interviews with women with various types of physical disabilities. Using grounded theory method, with a particular emphasis on symbolic interactionism, I identified three important themes from the non-standardised narrative interviews: the effects of insufficient health care on pregnant women, the lack of acceptance and support for mothers, and a welfare system inadequate to the needs of mothers. These themes affect the way Polish women with disabilities experience motherhood. Findings highlight the different ways that mothers with disabilities challenge the prevailing normative categories of gender and disability and, in so doing, demythologise and delegitimise the traditional Polish model of motherhood. While this study points to needed reforms in Poland to support women with disabilities, it also reveals a model of motherhood based on interdependence and mutual care. The women with disabilities in this study identify new possibilities for all families.
AschA. (2000). Why I haven’t changed my mind about prenatal diagnosis: Reflections and refinement. In ParensE.AschA. (Eds.), Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 234–258). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3.
AschA.RoussoH.JefferiesT. (2001). Beyond pedestals: The lives of girls and women with disabilities. In RoussoH.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Double jeopardy: Addressing gender in special education (pp. 13–48). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
4.
ATLAS.ti: The Qualitative Data Analysis & Research Software (version 6) [Computer software]. (2009). Retrieved fromhttp://atlasti.com/
5.
BanksM. (2010). 2009 Division 35 presidential address: Feminist psychology and women with disabilities: An emerging alliance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 431–442.
6.
BurchardtT. (2004). Capabilities and disability: The capabilities framework and the social model of disability. Disability & Society, 19, 735–751.
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
ClarkeA. (2003). Situational analysis: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 2, 553–576.
9.
CrawfordD.OstroveJ. M. (2003). Representations of disability and the interpersonal relationships of women with disabilities. Women & Therapy, 26, 179–194.
10.
CrispR. (2002). A counselling framework for understanding individual experiences of socially constructed disability. Disability Studies Quarterly, 22, 20–32.
11.
EllsC. (2001). Lessons about autonomy from the experience of disability. Social Theory and Practice, 27, 599–615.
12.
EvansS.de SouzaL. (2008). Dealing with chronic pain: Giving voice to the experiences of mothers with chronic pain and their children. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 489–500.
13.
Garland-ThomsonR. (2005). Feminist disability studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1557–1587.
14.
GlaserB. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
15.
GrueL.LaerumK. T. (2002). Doing motherhood: Some experiences of mothers with physical disabilities. Disability and Society, 17, 671–683.
16.
HryciukR. E.KorolczukE. (Eds.). (2012). Pożegnanie z Matką Polką? Dyskursy, praktyki i reprezentacje macierzyństwa we współczesnej Polsce [Farewell to the Polish Mother? Discourses, practices and representations of motherhood in contemporary Poland]. Warsaw, Poland: Warsaw University Press/Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
17.
KaschakE. (2001). Minding the body: Psychotherapy in cases of chronic and life-threatening illness. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
18.
KentD. (2000). Somewhere a mockingbird. In ParensE.AschA. (Eds.), Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 57–63). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
19.
KerrS. (2000). The application of the Americans with Disabilities Act to the termination of parental rights of individuals with mental disabilities. Journal of Contemporary Health, Law and Policy, 16, 387–426.
20.
KotowskaI.SztanderskaU.WóycickaI. (red.). (2007). Aktywność zawodowa i edukacyjna a obowiązki rodzinne w Polsce w świetle badań empirycznych [Professional and educational activity and family responsibilities in Poland in the light of empirical research]. Warsaw, Poland: Scholar Press/Wydawnictwo Scholar.
21.
LampS. (2006). “It is for the mother”: Feminists’ rhetorics of disability during the American eugenics period. Disability Studies Quarterly, 26. Retrieved fromhttp://dsq-sds.org/article/view/807/982
22.
LevittH. M.IppolitoM. R. (2014). Being transgender: Navigating minority stressors and developing authentic self-presentation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 46–64.
LloydM. (2001). The politics of disability and feminism: Discord or synthesis?Sociology, 35, 715–723.
25.
MalacridaC. (2007). Negotiating the dependency/nurturance tightrope: Dilemmas of motherhood and disability. Canadian Review of Sociology, 44, 469–493.
26.
MalacridaC. (2009). Performing motherhood in a disablist world: Dilemmas of motherhood, femininity and disability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22, 99–117.
27.
MayesR.LlewellynG.McConnellD. (2011). “That’s who I choose to be”: The mother identity for women with intellectual disabilities. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34, 112–120.
28.
MeekoshaH.ShuttleworthR.SoldaticK. (2013). Disability and critical sociology: Expanding the boundaries of critical social inquiry. Critical Sociology, 39, 319–323.
29.
MorrisJ. (1995). Creating a space for absent voices: Disabled women’s experience of receiving assistance with daily living activities. Feminist Review, 51, 68–93.
30.
MortonM. (2000). Unhappy families: Violence in the lives of girls and women. In TraustadottirR.JohnsonK. (Eds.), Women with intellectual disabilities: Finding place in the world (pp. 63–68). London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
31.
NosekM. A. (2010). Healthcare apartheid and quality of life for people with disabilities. Quality of Life Research, 19, 609–610.
32.
NosekM. A.HowlandC. A.RintalaD. H.YoungM. E.ChanpongM. S. (2001a). National study of women with physical disabilities: Final report. Sexuality and Disability, 19, 5–39.
33.
NosekM. A.HowlandC. A.RintalaD. H.YoungM. E.ChanpongM. S. (2001b). Vulnerabilities for abuse among women with disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 19, 177–189.
34.
OlesenV. L. (2007). Feminist qualitative research and grounded theory. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 417–435). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
OlsenR.WatesM. (2003). Disabled parents: Examining research assumptions. Dartington, England: Research in Practice.
36.
O’TooleC. J.DoeT. (2002). Sexuality and disabled parents with disabled children. Sexuality and Disability, 20, 89–101.
37.
ParishS. L.MagañaS.CassimanS. A. (2008). It’s just that much harder: Multi-layered hardship experiences of low-income mothers with disabilities. Affilia, 23, 51–65.
38.
PrilleltenskyO. (2003). A ramp to motherhood: The experiences of mothers with physical disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 21, 21–47.
39.
RadomskiD.Jarząbek-BieleckaG.Sowińska-PrzepieraE.MilewczykP. (2010). Problem opieki ginekologicznej nad dziewczętami i kobietami niepełnosprawnymi [The problem of gynecological care for girls and women with disabilities]. Practical Ginecology/Ginekologia Praktyczna, 2, 36–42.
40.
RennieD. L. (2012). Qualitative research as methodical hermeneutics. Psychological Methods, 17, 385–398.
41.
RubinA.BabbieE. (2010). Essential research methods for social works. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
42.
SaxtonM. (2000). Why members of the disability community oppose prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion. In ParensE.AschA. (Eds.), Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 147–164). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
43.
SchützeF. (2011). How to deal with autobiographical narrative interviews in the Euro identity research project. Sociological Review, 1, 41–91.
ShakespeareT. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London, England: Routledge.
46.
SoaresM. V. B.CarvalhoA. M. P. (2009). Women with mental disorders and motherhood. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 17, 632–638.
47.
SpragueJ.HayesJ. (2000). Self-determination and empowerment: A feminist standpoint analysis of talk about disability. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 671–695.
48.
StenhouseE.LetherbyG. (2011). Mother/daughter relationships during pregnancy and the transition to motherhood of women with pre-existing diabetes: Raising some issues. Midwifery, 27, 120–124.
49.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50.
TarletonB.WardL. (2007). “Parenting with support”: The views and experiences of parents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4, 194–202.
51.
The Family Planning, Human Fetus Protection and Conditions of Permissibility of Abortion Act of 1993, 17 Journal of Laws item 78 § 4a[Ustawa o planowaniu rodziny, ochronie płodu ludzkiego i warunkach dopuszczalności przerywania ciąży, Dz.U. 1993 Nr 17 poz. 78 § 4a]. Retrieved fromhttp://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU19930170078
ThomasC. (1997). The baby and the bath water: Disabled women and motherhood in social context. Sociology of Health & Illness, 19, 622–643.
54.
ThorneS. E. (1991). Mothers with chronic illness: A predicament of social construction. Health Care for Women International, 11, 209–221.
55.
TitkowA. (2007). Tożsamość polskich kobiet. Ciągłość, zmiana, konteksty [The identity of Polish women. Continuity, change, contexts]. Warsaw, Poland: Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences Press/ Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
56.
TitkowA. (2012). Figura Matki Polki: Próba delegitymizacji [Figure of Polish Mother: An attempt to delegitimise]. In HryciukR. E.KorolczukE. (Eds.), Pożegnanie z Matką Polką? Dyskursy, praktyki i reprezentacje macierzyństwa we współczesnej Polsce [Farewell to the Polish Mother? Discourses, practices and representations of motherhood in contemporary Poland] (pp. 27–47). Warsaw, Poland: Warsaw University Press.
57.
TitkowA.Duch-KrzystoszekD.BudrowskaB. (2004). Nieodpłatna praca kobiet: Mity, realia, perspektywy [Unpaid work of women: Myths, realities, perspectives]. Warsaw, Poland: Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences Press/ Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
Walsh-GallagherD.SinclairM.McConkeyR. (2012). The ambiguity of disabled women’s experiences of pregnancy and childbirth and motherhood: A phenomenological understanding. Midwifery, 28, 156–162.
60.
WatesM. (2002). Supporting disabled adults in their parenting role. York, England: Joseph Roundtree Foundation.
61.
WhyteR.IngstadB. (1995). Disability and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
62.
WilligC. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. London, England: McGraw-Hill Companies.
63.
Wołowicz-RuszkowskaA. (2013). Zanikanie? Trajektorie tożsamości kobiet z niepełnosprawnością [Disappearance? Identity trajectories of women with disabilities]. Warsaw, Poland: Academy of Special Education Press/Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
64.
WoźniakZ. (2008). Niepełnosprawność i niepełnosprawni w polityce społecznej [Disability and disabled people in social policy]. Warsaw, Poland: SWPS Academica Press/Wydawnictwo SWPS Academica.
65.
Zames FleischerD.ZamesF. (2011). The disability rights movement: From charity to confrontation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
