In the current study I used mixed methods to explore the messages that undergraduate women (n = 415) reported receiving from their male and female friends regarding sex and romantic relationships. Reports of friends’ messages varied widely and entailed both support for and criticism of sexual gatekeeping, sex positivity (e.g., sexual agency), and advice regarding sex and romantic relationships. Four individuals, including the author, developed codes to examine this wide range of responses to sexual expectations and prohibitions and independently and reliably coded the data. Response patterns illustrate that reports of female friends’ messages were typically longer and more nuanced than reports of male friends’ messages. Sex-positive messages and sexual gatekeeping messages were frequently reported simultaneously, and this pattern of co-occurrence illustrates the tensions between diverse discourses regarding women’s sexuality. The diversity in reports of friends’ messages challenges popular notions that friends’ influences are wholly problematic and highlights a need for more gender-focused sex education curricula.
AckermanJ. M.KenrickD. T. (2009). Cooperative courtship: Helping friends raise and raze relationship barriers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1285–1300. doi:10.1177/0146167209335640
2.
AgostinelliG.SealD. W. (1998). Social comparisons of one’s own with others’ attitudes toward casual and reponsible sex. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 845–860.
3.
AllisonR.RismanB. J. (2013). A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality. Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206.
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469
5.
ArmstrongE. A.HamiltonL. T. (2013). Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
6.
BambergM. (2004). Forms and functions of ‘slut bashing’ in male identity constructions in 15-year-olds. Human Development, 47, 331–353.
7.
BaumeisterR. F.TwengeJ. M. (2002). Cultural supression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.6.2.166
8.
Bay-ChengL. Y.Eliseo-ArrasR. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 386–397. doi:10.1080/00224490802398381
9.
Bay-ChengL. Y.LivingstonJ. A.FavaN. M. (2013). Making space for peers, adults, and complexity in adolescent girls’ sexual development. In ZurbriggenE. L.RobertsT.-A. (Eds.), The sexualization of girls and girlhood: Causes, consequences, and girlhood (pp. 257–277). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
BettieJ. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
BogleK. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York, NY: NYU Press.
12.
BowenG. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8, 137–152. doi:10.1177/1468794107085301
13.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2012). Thematic analysis. In CooperH. (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57–71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
Brown GivensS. M.MonahanJ. L. (2005). Priming mammies, jezebels, and other controlling images: An examination of the influence of mediated stereotypes on perceptions of an African American woman. Media Psychology, 7, 87–106. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0701_5
15.
BudgeonS. (2014). The dynamics of gender hegemony, feminities, masculinities and social change. Sociology, 48, 317–344. doi:10.1177/0038038513490358
16.
CharmaramanL.McKameyC. (2011). Urban early adolescent narratives on sexuality: Accidental and intentional influences of family, peers, and the media. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8, 253–266. doi:10.1007/s13178-011-9952-3
17.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
ChoS. K. (1997). Converging stereotypes in racialized sexual harassment: Where the model minority meets Suzie Wong. Journal of Gender, Race, & Justice, 1, 177–212.
19.
ChockT. M. (2011). Is it seeing or believing? Exposure, perceived realism, and emerging adults’ perceptions of their own and others’ attitudes about relationships. Media Psychology, 14, 355–386. doi:10.1080/15213269.2011.620537
20.
ColeyR. L.LombardiC. M.LynchA. D.MahalikJ. R.SimsJ. (2013). Sexual partner accumulation from adolescence through early adulthood: The role of family, peer, and school social norms. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 91–97. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.005
21.
Dedoose. (2014). Dedoose (Version 5.0.11) [Web application]. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.
22.
FletcherK. D.WardL. M.ThomasK.FoustM.LevinD.TrinhS. (2015). Will it help? Identifying socialization discourses that promote sexual risk and sexual health among African American youth. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 199–212. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.853724
23.
FugèreM. A.EscotoC.CousinsA. J.RiggsM. L.HaerichP. (2008). Sexual attitudes and double standards: A literature review focusing on participant gender and ethnic background. Sexuality & Culture, 12, 169–182. doi:10.1007/s12119-008-9029-7
24.
GarciaJ. R.ReiberC.MasseyS. G.MerriwetherA. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911
25.
GilmartinS. K. (2006). Changes in college women’s attitudes toward sexual intimacy. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 429–454.
26.
GrahamC. A.SandersS. A.MilhausenR. R.McBrideK. R. (2004). Turning on and turning off: A focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 527–538.
27.
GroseR. G.GrabeS.KohfeldtD. (2014). Sexual education, gender ideology, and youth sexual empowerment. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 742–753. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.809511
28.
HaberlandN.RogowD. (2015). Sexuality education: Emerging trends in evidence and practice. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, S15–S21. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.08.013
29.
HamiltonL.ArmstrongE. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23, 589–616. doi:10.1177/0891243209345829
30.
HandL. S.FurmanW. (2009). Rewards and costs in adolescent other-sex friendships: Comparisons to same-sex friendships and romantic relationships. Social Development, 18, 270–287. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00499.x
31.
HillierL.HarrisonL.WarrD. (1998). “When you carry condoms all the boys think you want it”: Negotiating competing discourses about safe sex. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 15–29. doi:10.1006/jado.1997.0126
32.
HolmanA.SillarsA. (2012). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health Communications, 27, 205–216. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575540
33.
ImpettE. A.PeplauL. A.GableS. L. (2005). Approach and avoidance sexual motives: Implications for personal and interpersonal well being. Personal Relationships, 12, 465–482. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00126.x
34.
KenneyS. R.ThadaniV.GhaidarovT.LaBrieJ. W. (2013). First year college women’s motivations for hooking up: A mixed-methods examination of normative peer perceptions and personal hookup participation. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25, 212–224. doi:10.1080/19317611.2013.786010
35.
KimJ. L.SorsoliC. L.CollinsK.ZylbergoldB. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145–157.
36.
KimJ. L.WardL. M. (2012). Striving for pleasure without fear: Short-term effects of reading a women’s magazine on women’s sexual attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 326–336. doi:10.1177/0361684312442856
37.
KreagerD. A.StaffJ. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 143–164.
38.
LefkowitzE. S.BooneT. L.ShearerC. L. (2004). Communication with best friends about sex-related topics during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 339–351.
39.
LefkowitzE. S.Espinosa-HernandezG. (2007). Sex-related communication with mothers and close friends during the transition to university. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 17–27.
40.
LevinD. S.WardL. M.NeilsonE. C. (2012). Formative sexual communications, sexual agency and coercion, and youth sexual health. Social Service Review, 86, 487–516.
41.
LewisM. A.LeeC. M.PatrickM E.FossosN. (2007). Gender-specific normative misperceptions of risky sexyal behavior and alcohol-related risky sexual behavior. Sex Roles, 57, 81–90.
42.
LivingstonJ. A.Bay-ChengL. Y.HequembourgA. L.TestaM.DownsJ. S. (2012). Mixed drinks and mixed messages: Adolescent girls’ perspectives on alcohol and sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 38–50. doi:10.1177/0361684312464202
43.
MenegatosL.LedermanL. C.HessA. (2010). Friends don’t let Jane hook up drunk: A qualitative analysis of participation in a simulation of college drinking-related decisions. Communication Education, 59, 374–388. doi:10.1080/03634521003628909
44.
MilhausenR. R.HeroldE. S. (1998). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 361–368.
45.
MontemurroB.BartasavichJ.WintermuteL. (2015). Let’s (not) talk about sex: The gender of sexual discourse. Sexuality & Culture, 19, 139–156. doi:10.1007/s12119-014-9250-5
46.
MontemurroB.GillenM. M. (2013). How clothes make the woman immoral: Impressions given off by sexualized clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 31, 167–181. doi:10.1177/0887302X13493128
47.
MorganE. M.KorobovN. (2012). Interpersonal identity formation in conversations with close friends about dating relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1471–1483.
48.
MuehlenhardC. L.PetersonZ. D. (2005). III. Wanting and not wanting sex: The missing discourse of ambivalence. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 15–20. doi:10.1177/0959-353505049698
49.
PatrickM. E.MorganN.MaggsJ. L.LefkowitzE. S. (2011). “I got your back:” Friends’ understandings regarding college student spring break behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 108–120. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9515-8
50.
PaulE. L.HayesK. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661.
51.
PhillipsL. (2000). Flirting with danger: Young women’s reflections on sexuality and domination. New York, NY: NYU Press.
52.
PomerantzS.RabyR.StefanikA. (2013). Girls run the world?: Caught between sexism and postfeminism in school. Gender & Society, 27, 185–207.
53.
RahimiR.ListonD. (2009). What does she expect when she dresses like that? Teacher interpretations of emerging adolescent female sexuality. Educational Studies, 45, 512–533. doi:10.1080/00131940903311362
54.
RubinG. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In VanceC. (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). Boston, MA: Routledge.
55.
SmilerA. (2012). Challenging Casanova: Beyond the stereotype of the promiscuous young male. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56.
TolmanD. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
TrinhS. L.WardL. M. (in press). Gendered patterns of peer sexual communications among heterosexual emerging adults. Journal of Sex Research. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1015715
58.
TrinhS. L.WardL. M.DayK.ThomasK.LevinD. (2014). Contributions of divergent peer and parent sexual messages to Asian American college students’ sexual behaviors. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 208–220. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.721099
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
