Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been identified as one of the most serious issues facing Native American women. Despite epidemic rates of IPV in urban and reservation communities, less is known about IPV in Native American populations than with any other racial group, and the existing literature and intervention research are scant. Many Native American scholars assert that IPV was rare and severely sanctioned in pre-contact societies. The present community-level, qualitative study used ethnographic and grounded theory approaches to examine the beliefs and perspectives of nine men from a Great Lakes reservation community who had experiences with IPV. These men believed that IPV was an increasing problem in the community and that it was not a part of traditional pre-contact culture but instead is a problem brought on by colonization and the introduction of alcohol. They indicated that returning to traditional tribal values was key to sobriety and nonviolence. Study themes suggest the importance of the historical social context and Native cultural values as essential elements in prevention and treatment initiatives. The study supports current Native American approaches to IPV and the ecological feminist framework for understanding violence against women. The article concludes with suggestions for culturally sensitive approaches for future research in Native American communities.
AndersonK. L. (2002). Perpetrator or victim? Relationships between intimate partner violence and well-being. Journal of Marriage & Family, 64, 851–853.
4.
ArbogastD. (1995). Wounded warriors: A time for healing. Omaha, NE: Little Turtle.
5.
ArtichokerK.GullicksonV. (2003). Raising public awareness on domestic violence in Indian Country. Retrieved from the National Online Resource Center on Violence Against Women website: www.vawnet.org
6.
Bent-GoodlyT. (2005). Culture and domestic violence: Transforming knowledge development. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 195–203.
7.
BogradM.YlloK. (1989). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
BohnD. K. (2003). Lifetime physical and sexual abuse, substance abuse depression and suicide attempts among Native American Women. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 24, 333–352.
9.
BowenG. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8, 137–152. doi:10.1177/1468794107085301
10.
BowkerL. H. (1983). Beating wife beating. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
11.
BrowneA.WilliamsK. R. (1989). Exploring the effect of resource availability and the likelihood of female-perpetrated homicides. Law and Society Review, 23, 75–94.
12.
CazenaveN. A.StrausM. A. (1990). Race, class, network embeddedness, and family violence: A search for potent support systems. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 321–339). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
13.
CharmazK. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In EmersonR. M. (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 109–126). Boston, MA: Little Brown.
14.
CharmazK. (1995). Grounded theory. In SmithJ. A.HarreR.Van LengenhoveL. (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27–49). London, England: Sage.
15.
ChesterB.RobinR. W.KossM. P.LopezJ.GoldmanD. (1994). Grandmother dishonored: Violence against women in Native communities. Violence and Victims, 9, 249–258.
16.
ChoneyS. K.Berryhill-PaapkeE.RobbinsR. R. (1995). The acculturation of American Indians: Developing frameworks for research and practice. In PonterottoJ. G.CasasJ. M.SuzukiL. A.AlexanderC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (pp. 73–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
ChunK. M.OrganistaP. B.MarinG. (Eds). (2003). Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement and applied research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
CokerD. (1999). Enhancing autonomy for battered women: Lessons from Navajo peacemaking. UCLA Law Review, 47, 1–111.
19.
CollinsJ. J.KroutilL. A.RolandJ.Moore-GurreraM. (1997). Issues in the linkage of alcohol and domestic violence services. Recent Developments in Alcoholism, 13, 387–405. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47141-8_20
20.
CooleyC. S.SeversonK. (1993). Establishing feminist systemic criteria for viewing violence and alcoholism. In HansenM.HarwayM. (Eds.), Battering and family therapy: A feminist perspective (pp. 217–226). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative research. Theory Into Practice, 39, 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903
22.
DeVaultM. L. (1990). Talking and listening from women’s standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems, 3, 96–116.
23.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York, NY: The Free Press.
24.
DuranE.DuranB. (1995). Postcolonial psychology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
25.
DuranE.DuranB.WoodisW.WoodisP. (1998). A post-colonial perspective on intimate partner violence in Indian country. In CarilloR.TelloJ. (Eds.), Family violence and men of color: Healing the wounded male spirit (pp. 143–162). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
ErwinP.VidalesG. (2001). Intimate partner violence, people of color and the criminal justice system: A case for prevention (Racial justice papers). San Francisco, CA: Family Violence Prevention Fund.
27.
FairchildD. G.FairchildM. W.StonerS. (1998). Prevalence of adult domestic violence among women seeking routine care in a Native American healthcare facility. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1515–1517.
28.
FonowM. M.CookJ. A. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
29.
FonowM. M.CookJ. A. (2005). Feminist methodology: New applications in the academy and public policy. Signs, 30, 2211–2236. doi:10.1086/428417
30.
FriezeI. H. (1979). Perceptions of battered wives. In FriezeI. H.Bar-TalD.CarrollJ. S. (Eds.), New approaches to social problems: Applications of attribution theory (pp. 79–108). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
FriezeI. H.BrowneA. (1989). Violence in marriage. In OhlinL.TonreyM. H. (Eds.), New approaches to social problems: Application and attribution theory (pp. 162–218). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
FriezeI. H.McHughM. C. (1992). Power and influences strategies in violent and non-violent marriages. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 449–465.
33.
FriezeI. H.KnobleJ. (1980). The effects of alcohol on marital violence. Cited in CooleyC. S.SeversonK. (1993). Establishing systematic criteria for viewing violence and alcoholism. In HansenM.HarwayM. (Eds.), Battering and family therapy: A feminist perspective (pp. 217–226). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
GarrettM. T.CarrollJ. J. (2002). Mending the broken circle: Treatment of substance dependence among Native Americans. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 379–388.
35.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
36.
GlaserB. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
37.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
38.
GreenR. (1980). Native American women. Signs, 6, 248–267.
39.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1983). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
HambergerL. K.HastingsJ. E. (1988). Skills training for the treatment of spouse abusers: An outcome study. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 121–130.
41.
HambergerL. K.HastingsJ. E. (1991). Personality correlates of men who batter and non-violent men: Some continuities and discontinuities. Journal of Family Violence, 6, 131–147.
42.
HambyS. (2000). The importance of community in a feminist analysis of domestic violence among American Indians. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 649–669.
43.
HambyS. L.SugarmanD. B. (1996). Power and partner violence: A meta-analytic review. In HambyS. L. (Chair), Theorizing and gender socialization and power in family violence. Symposium conducted at American Psychological Association Annual meeting, Toronto, Ontario.
44.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
45.
HansenM.HarwayM. (1993). Battering and family therapy: A feminist perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
HardingS. (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
47.
HardingS. (1992). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48.
HayesH. R.EmshoffJ. G. (1993). Substance abuse and family violence. In HamptonR. L.GullotaT. P.AdamsG. R.PotterE. H.IIIWeissbergR. P. (Eds.), Family violence: Prevention and treatment (Vol. 1, pp. 281–310). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
HotalingG. T.SugarmanD. B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims, 1, 101–124.
50.
JaimesM. A.HalseyT. (1992). American Indian women: At the center of indigenous resistance in North America. In JaimesM. A. (Ed.), The state of Native America: Genocide, colonization and resistance (pp. 311–344). Boston, MA: South End Press.
51.
KasturiranganA.KrishnanS.RigerS. (2004). The impact of culture and minority status on women’s experience of domestic violence. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 5, 318–332.
52.
KawamotoW. T. (2001). Community mental health and family issues in socio-historical context: The confederated tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1482–1491.
53.
KleinL. F.AckermanL. A. (Eds.). (1995). Women and power in Native North America. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
LaFromboiseT. D.TrimbleJ. E.MohattG. (1995). Counseling intervention and American Indian tradition: An integrative approach. In MonteiroK. P. (Ed.), Ethnicity and psychology; African-, Asian-, Latino-, and Native-American psychologies. Dubuque, IO: Kendall /Hunt.
56.
LeedyP. D.OrmrodJ. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merill.
57.
LeonardK. (2001). Domestic violence and alcohol: What is known and what do we need to know to encourage environmental interventions?Journal of Substance Use, 6, 235–247. doi:10.1080/146598901753325075
58.
LeonardK. E. (2005). Alcohol and intimate partner violence: When can we say that heavy drinking is a contributing cause of violence?Addiction, 100, 422–425. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00994.x
59.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60.
MartinS. E. (1992). The epidemiology of alcohol related interpersonal violence. Alcohol Health and Research World, 13, 230–237.
61.
Matamonasa-BennettA. (2011). The first and second coming of White Buffalo Calf Woman. In MonaghanP. (Ed.), Goddesses in world culture (Vol. 3, pp. 161–175). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger ABC-CLIO.
62.
Matamonasa-BennettA. (2013). “Until people are given the right to be human again”: Voices of American Indian men on domestic violence and traditional cultural values. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 37, 25–51.
63.
McCarrollJ. E.NewbyJ. H.BenedelD. M.UrsanoR. J.VineburghN. (Eds.). (2006). Family violence research, assessment and interventions: Looking back, looking ahead. Retrieved fromhttp://cstsonline.org
64.
McCormickR. M. (2000). Aboriginal traditions in the treatment of substance abuse. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 34, 25–32.
65.
McHughM. C.BartoszekT. A. R. (2000). Intimate violence. In BiagioM.HersenM. (Eds.), Issues in the psychology of women (pp. 115–142). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
66.
Mending the Sacred Hoop. (2011). About us: Working to end violence against Native American women. Retrieved fromhttp://mshoop.org
67.
MerriamS. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
68.
National Congress of American Indians. (2013). Policy insights brief: Statistics on violence against Native women. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncai.org/
69.
NelsonG.PrilleltenskyI. (2005). Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
70.
NortonI.MansonS. (1996). Research in American Indian and Alaska Native communities: Navigating the cultural universe of values and process. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 856–860.
71.
NortonI.MansonS. (1997). Domestic violence intervention in an urban Indian health center. Community Mental Health Journal, 33, 331–337.
72.
OlesenV. (1994). Feminisms and models of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 158–174). London, England: Sage.
73.
PenceE.PaymarM. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York, NY: Springer.
74.
Roesch-WagnerS. (2000). The untold story of the Iroquois influence on early feminists: Essays by Sally Roesch-Wagner. Fayetteville, NY: Sky Carrier Press.
75.
RosenbaumA.GeffnerR.BenjaminS. (1997). A biopsychosocial model for understanding relationship aggression. In GeffnerR.RosenbaumS. B.Lundburg-LoveR. K. (Eds.), Violence and sexual abuse at home: Current issues in spousal battering and child maltreatment (pp. 57–80). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
76.
RyanA. B. (2006). Post-positivist approaches to research. In AntonesaM.FallonH.RyanA. B.RyanA.WalshT.BorysL. (Eds.), Research and writing your thesis: A guide for post-graduate students (pp. 12–28). Maynooth, Ireland: Maynooth Adult Community Education, NUI.
77.
SandersD. G. (1996). Feminist-cognitive-behavioral and process psychodynamic treatments for men who batter: Interaction of abuser traits and treatment models. Violence and Victims, 11, 393–413.
78.
SchinkeS.OrlandiM.BotvinG.GilchristL.TrimbleJ.LocklearV. (1988). Preventing substance abuse among American Indian adolescents: A bi-cultural competence skills approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 87–90.
79.
SokoloffN.DupontI. (2005). “Domestic violence at the intersection of race, class and gender: Challenges and contributions”Violence Against Women, 11, 38–64. doi:10.1177/1077801204271476
80.
SpragueJ.ZimmermanM. (1993). Overcoming dualisms: A feminist agenda for sociological methodology. In EnglandP. (Ed.), Theory on gender feminisms (pp. 255–280). New York, NY: Aldine Debruyter.
81.
StanleyL. (2013). Feminist praxis: Research theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. London, England: Routledge.
82.
StanleyL.WiseS. (1993). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology. New York, NY: Routledge.
83.
SteinmetzS. K. (1987). Family violence: Past, present and future. In SussmanM. B.SteinmetzS. K. (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and family (pp. 725–765). New York, NY: Plenum.
84.
StraussA. L. (2003). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, MA: University Press.
85.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86.
SugarmanD. B.HotalingG. T. (1989). Violent men in intimate relationships: An analysis of risk markers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1034–1048.
87.
TeheeM.EsquedaC. W. (2008). American Indian and European American women’s perceptions of domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 25–35. doi:10.1007/s1089/s10896-007-91267
88.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Full report on the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey [NCJ183781]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/183781.pdf
89.
TolmanR. M.BennettL. W. (1990). A review of quantitative research on men who batter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 159–177.
90.
Tuhiwai SmithL. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed Books Ltd.
91.
WalkerL. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
92.
WaltersK. (1999). Urban American Indian identity attitudes and acculturation styles. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 2, 163–178. doi:10.1300/J137v02n01_11
93.
WeaverH. N. (2009). The colonial context of violence: Reflections on violence in the lives of Native American women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1552–1563.
94.
ZionJ.ZionF. B. (1996). Hozho’ Sokee’ stay together nicely: Domestic violence under Navajo common law. In NielsonM. O.SilvermanR. A. (Eds.), Native Americans, crime and justice (pp. 96–112). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
