Violence against women is a widespread societal problem substantiated and perpetuated through inequities that operate within numerous levels of the society. Challenging and ending gender-based violence therefore requires addressing social structures that perpetuate gendered hierarchies and maintain women’s susceptibility to experiencing violence worldwide. The present study examines novel approaches taken by women in two different countries in the Global South, one in Nicaragua and another in Tanzania, to examine macro-level processes involved in land ownership in regions where owning land is a marker of dominance. Using data from 492 women, results from structural equation models and qualitative thematic analyses demonstrate significant links among women’s ownership of land, relationship power, and receipt of physical and psychological violence in both the countries. Collectively, the findings suggest that when women own land, they gain power within their relationships and are less likely to experience violence. Implications for theoretical conceptualizations of eradicating violence against women and practical interventions are discussed.
AgarwalB. (1994). Field of one's own: Property rights in South Asia. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AhrensC. E. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 263–274.
3.
AlvarezS. (2009). Beyond NGOization? Reflections from Latin America. Development, 52, 175–184.
4.
AnnanK. (2000). Address by Mr. Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations. Speech presented at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved fromhttp://unctad.org/en/docs/ux_tdl365.en.pdf
5.
ApfelbaumE. (1979). Relations of domination and movements for liberation: An analysis of power between groups. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations(I. Lubek, Trans.) (pp. 188–204). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
6.
BabcockJ. C.WaltzJ.JacobsonN. S.GottmanJ. M. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 40–50.
7.
BentlerP. M.ChouC. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 71–101.
9.
BroegaardR. B. (2009). Land access and titling in Nicaragua. Development and Change, 40, 149–169.
10.
CarminesE. G.McIverJ. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In BohrnstedtG. W.BorgattaE. F. (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
CastroR.CasiqueI.BrindisC. D. (2008). Empowerment and physical violence throughout women's reproductive life in Mexico. Violence Against Women, 14, 655–677.
12.
ChrislerJ. C.FergusonS. (2006). Violence against women as a public health issue. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087, 235–249.
13.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
14.
CohenJ. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.
15.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180.
16.
ColemanD. H.StrausM. A. (1986). Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. Violence and Victims, 1, 141–157.
17.
ConnellR. (1987). Gender and power: The society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
ConnellR. (2009). Gender: In world perspective. Cambridge, England: Polity.
19.
ConnellR. (2012). Gender, health and theory: Conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1675–1683.
20.
CortinaL. M.CurtinN.StewartA. J. (2012). Where is social structure in personality research? A feminist analysis of publication trends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 259–273.
21.
CrenshawK. W. (1995). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In CrenshawK. W.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 359–383). New York, NY: New Press.
22.
DeereC. D.LeonM. (2001). Who owns the land? Gender and land-titling programmes in Latin America. Journal of Agrarian Change, 1, 440–467.
23.
DunkleK. L.JewkesR. K.BrownH. C.GrayG. E.McIntyreJ. A.HarlowS. D. (2004). Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. The Lancet, 363, 1415–1421.
24.
DworkinS.GrabeS.LuT.HatcherA.KwenaZ.BukusiE.…Mwaura-MuiruE. (2013). Property rights violations in Nyanza and Western Provinces, Kenya: A qualitative examination of this critical structural driver of women's HIV risks. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 703–713.
25.
EllsbergM.HeiseL. (2005). Researching violence against women: A practical guide or researchers and activists. Washington, DC: WHO, PATH.
26.
Else-QuestN. M.GrabeS. (2012). The political is personal: Measurement and application of national-level indicators of gender equity in psychological research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 131–144.
27.
EnglertB.DaleyE. (2008). Women's land rights & privatization in Eastern Africa. Oxford, UK: James Currey.
28.
FerreeM.TrippA. (2006). Global feminism: Transnational women's activism, organizing, and human rights. New York: New York University Press.
29.
FineM. (1989). The politics of research and activism: Violence against women. Gender and Society, 3, 549–558.
30.
FlakeD. F. (2005). Individual, family, and community risk factors for domestic violence in Peru. Violence Against Women, 11, 353–373.
31.
FrancisJ. J.JohnstonM.RobertsonC.GlidewellL.EntwistleV.EcclesM. P.…GrimshawJ. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalizing data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25, 1229–1245.
32.
FriezeI. H.McHughM. C. (1992). Power and influence strategies in violent and nonviolent marriages. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 449–465.
33.
GageA. J.HutchinsonP. L. (2006). Power, control, and intimate partner sexual violence in Haiti. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 11–24.
34.
GlickP.FiskeS. (1999). Gender, power dynamics, and social interaction. In FerreeM. M.LorberJ. (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 365–398). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
GomézA.RacioneroS.SordéT. (2010). Ten years of critical communicative methodology. International Review of Qualitative Research, 3, 17–43.
36.
GrabeS. (2010a). Promoting gender equality: The role of status, power, and control in the link between land ownership and violence in Nicaragua. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10, 146–170.
37.
GrabeS. (2010b). Women’s human rights and empowerment in a transnational, globalized context: What’s psychology got to do with it? In PaludiM. (Ed.), Feminism and women’s rights worldwide (Vol. 2, pp. 17–46). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
38.
GrabeS.Else-QuestN. M. (2012). The role of transnational feminism in psychology: Complimentary visions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 158–161.
39.
GriscomJ. L. (1992). Women and power: Definition, dualism, and difference. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 389–389.
40.
GroseR. G.GrabeS. (2014). The explanatory role of relationship power and control in domestic violence against women in Nicaragua: A feminist psychology analysis. Violence Against Women, 20, 972–993.
41.
HeiseL. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4, 262–290.
42.
HodgsonD. L. (2011). Gender and culture at the limit of rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
43.
HolmbeckG. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610.
44.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
45.
JejeebhoyS. J. (1998). Wife-beating in rural India: A husband’s right?Economic and Political Weekly, 33, 855–862.
46.
JenkinsS. R. (2000). Introduction to the special issue: Defining gender, relationships, and power. Sex Roles, 42, 467–493.
47.
JewkesR.DunkleK.NdunaM.ShaiN. (2010). Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: A cohort study. The Lancet, 376, 41–48.
48.
JordanC. E. (2009). Advancing the study of violence against women evolving research agendas into science. Violence Against Women, 15, 393–419.
49.
KossM. P. (1990). The women's mental health research agenda: Violence against women. American Psychologist, 45, 374–380.
50.
Lastarria-CornhielS. (1997). Impact of privatization on gender and property rights in Africa. World Development, 25, 1317–1333.
51.
LugonesM. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25, 742–759.
52.
ManjiA. S. (1998). Gender and the politics of the land reform process in Tanzania. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 36, 645–667.
53.
MarecekJ. (2011). Numbers and interpretations: What is at stake in our ways of knowing?Theory & Psychology, 21, 220–240.
54.
MarecekJ. (2012). The global is local adding culture, ideology, and context to international psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 149–153.
55.
MaxwellJ. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–11.
56.
MoaneG. (1999). Gender and colonialism: A psychological analysis of oppression and liberation. London, England: Macmillan.
57.
MohantyC. T. (2003). “Under western eyes” revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs, 28, 499–535.
58.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
59.
NaplesN. A.DesaiM. (2002). Women's activism and globalization: Linking local struggles and transnational politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
60.
PalmerR. (2008). Foreword. In EnglertE. D. E. (Ed.), Women's rights to land & privatization in Eastern Africa (pp. 1–4). Oxford, England: James Currey.
61.
PandaP.AgarwalB. (2005). Marital violence, human development, and women’s property status in India. World Development, 33, 823–850.
62.
PandeyS. (2010). Rising property ownership among women in Kathmandu, Nepal: An exploration of causes and consequences. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 281–291.
63.
PeñaN.MaiquesM.CastilloG. E. (2008). Using rights-based and gender-analysis arguments for land rights for women: Some initial reflections from Nicaragua. Gender & Development, 16, 55–71.
64.
PettigrewT. F. (1991). Toward unity and bold theory: Popperian suggestions for two persistent problems of social psychology. In StephanC. W.StephanW. G.PettigrewT. F. (Eds.), The future of social psychology (pp. 13–27). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
65.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
66.
PulerwitzJ.GortmakerS. L.DeJongW. (2000). Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles, 42, 637–660.
67.
SteigerJ. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
68.
StewartA. J. (1998). Doing personality research: How can feminist theories help? In NoremJ. K.ClinchyB. M. (Eds.), The gender and psychology reader (pp. 54–68). New York: New York University Press.
69.
StewartA. J.ColeE. (2007). Narratives and numbers: Feminist multiple methods research. In Hesse-BiberS. N. (Ed.), The handbook of feminist research (pp. 327–354). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.
71.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
TrippA. (2004). Women’s movements, customary law, and land rights in Africa: The case of Uganda. African Studies Quarterly, 7, 1–19.
74.
United Nations Development Fund for Women. (2006). Violence against women: Facts and figures. New York: NY: UNIFEM.
75.
WingoodG. M.DiClementeR. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 539–565.
76.
World Health Organization. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
YoderJ. D.KahnA. S. (2003). Making gender comparisons more meaningful: A call for more attention to social context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 281–290.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
