The goals of the current study were to apply the construct of stereotype accuracy to the domain of college women’s perceptions of the effects of full-time maternal employment on children. Both accuracy/inaccuracy and positive/negative direction were examined. Participants were 1,259 college women who provided stereotyped projections about the effects of full-time employment on children’s IQ scores, formal achievement tests, school grades, and internalizing and externalizing behavior problems. Their stereotype effect sizes were compared to meta-analytic effect sizes used to estimate the “actual” effects of maternal employment on children. Individual differences in these stereotypes were also examined. Results indicate that, on average, college women overestimated the negative effects of full-time maternal employment on child outcomes, especially behavior problems. Significant variability in the direction and accuracy of the stereotypes was explained by individual characteristics such as gender ideology, extrinsic work values, and beliefs about the costs of maternal employment. Concerns are that college-educated young women may retreat from the labor force due to stereotypes about the effects of their future employment on children. Efforts by researchers, practitioners, and policy makers should be directed toward disseminating accurate information and dispelling myths about the likely impact of maternal employment on children’s development.
AlessandriS. M. (1992). Effects of maternal work status in single-parent families on children’s perception of self and family and school achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 417–433.
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
3.
AshtonM. C.EssesV. M. (1999). Stereotype accuracy: Estimating the academic performance of ethnic groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 225–236.
4.
BaumC. L. (2003). Does early maternal employment harm child development? An analysis of the potential benefits of leave taking. Journal of Labor Economics, 21, 409–448.
5.
BolzendahlC. I.MyersD. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974-1998. Social Forces, 83, 759–790.
6.
BritonN. J.HallJ. A. (1995). Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 32, 79–90. doi:10.1007/BF01544758
7.
Brooks-GunnJ.HanW.-J.WaldfogelJ. (2010). First-year maternal employment and child development in the first 7 years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 75, 1–147.
8.
BuetellN. J.BrennerO. C. (1986). Sex differences in work values. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 28, 29–41. doi:org/10.1016/0001-8791(86)90037-0
9.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2011). Labor force characteristics by race and ethnicity, 2010. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bls.gov
10.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2012). Employment characteristics of families summary. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bls.gov
11.
CamposB.UllmanJ.AguileraA.Dunkel SchetterC. (2014). Familism and psychological health: The intervening role of closeness and social support. Journal of Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
ColeyR. L.LombardiC. M. (2012). Does maternal employment following childbirth support or inhibit low-income children’s long-term development?Child Development, 84, 178–197. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01840.x
14.
DavisS. N.GreensteinT. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920
15.
DiekmanA. B.EaglyA. H.KulesaP. (2002). Accuracy and bias in stereotypes about the social and political attitudes of women and men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 268–282.
16.
DrobničS.WittigI. (1997). Part-time work in the United States of America. In BlossfeldH.-P.HakimC. (Eds.), Between equalization and marginalization: Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America (pp. 289–314). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17.
EaglyA. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. John M. MacEachran memorial lecture series; 1985. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
EbyL. TCasperW. J.LockwoodA.BordeauxC.BrinleyA. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980-2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.
19.
EcclesJ. S.HoffmanL. W. (1984). Sex differences in preparation for occupational roles. In StevensonH.SiegelA. (Eds.), Child development and social policy (pp. 367s–420). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
FaulR.ErdfelderE. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post-hoc and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn, Germany: Bonn University, Department of Psychology.
21.
GalambosN.PetersenA. C.RichardsM.GitelsonI. B. (1985). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale for Adolescents (AWSA): A study of reliability and validity. Sex Roles, 13, 343–356.
22.
GanglM.ZiefleA. (2009). Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography, 46, 341–369. doi:10.1353/dem.0.0056
23.
GareyA. I. (1999). Weaving work and motherhood. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
24.
GersonK. (2009). The unfinished revolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
GoldbergW. A.KellyE.MatthewsN. B.KangH.LiW.SumarokaM. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same: Gender, culture, and college students’ views about work and family. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 814–837.
26.
GoldbergW. A.Lucas-ThompsonR. (2011). Maternal and paternal employment, effect of. In BensonJ.HaithM. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of infant and early child development (pp. 268–279). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
27.
GoldbergW. A.PrauseJ. A.Lucas-ThompsonR.HimselA. (2008). Maternal employment and children’s achievement in context: A meta-analysis of four decades of research. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 77–108. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.77
28.
GottfriedA. E.GottfriedA. W. (1988). Maternal employment and children’s development: An integration of longitudinal findings with implications for social policy. In GottfriedA. E.GottfriedA. W. (Eds.), Maternal employment and children’s development: Longitudinal research (pp. 269–287). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
29.
GreenbergerE.GoldbergW. A.CrawfordT. J.GrangerJ. (1988). Beliefs about the consequences of maternal employment for children. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 35–59. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00926.x
30.
GreggP.WashbrookE.PropperC.BurgessS. (2005). The effects of a mother’s return to work decision on child development in the UK. The Economic Journal, 115, F48–F80. doi:10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00972.x
31.
HallJ. A.CarterJ. D. (1999). Gender-stereotype accuracy as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 350–359.
32.
HalpernD. F.StraightC. A.StephensonC. L. (2011). Beliefs about cognitive gender differences: Accurate for direction, underestimated for size. Sex Roles, 64, 336–347.
33.
HanW.-J.RuhmC. J.WaldfogelJ.WashbrookE. (2008). The timing of mothers’ employment after childbirth. Monthly Labor Review, 131, 15–27.
34.
HaysS. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
HochschildA. R. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York, NY: Viking.
36.
HoffmanL. W. (1980). The effects of maternal employment on the academic attitudes and performance of school-aged children. School Psychology Review, 9, 319–335.
37.
HoffmanL.YoungbladeL. (1999). Mothers at work: Effects on children’s well-being. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38.
HoffnungM. (2004). Wanting it all: Career, marriage, and motherhood during college-educated women’s 20s. Sex Roles, 50, 711–723. doi:10.1023/B: SERS. 0000027572.57049.ff
39.
JohnsonM. K. (2005). Family roles and work values: Processes of selection and change. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 352–369.
40.
JuddC. M.ParkB. (1993). Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 100, 109–128.
41.
JussimL.CainT.CrawfordJ.HarberK.CohenF. (2009). The unbearable accuracy of stereotypes. In NelsonT. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 199–228). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
42.
KonradA. M.RitchieJ. E.JrLiebP.CorrigallE. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593–641.
43.
KroskaA. (2009). Exploring the consequences of gender ideology-work discrepancies. Sex Roles, 60, 313–329.
44.
LaughlinL. (2011). Maternity leave and employment patterns of first-time mothers: 1961-2008. Current Population Report, P70–128. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
45.
Lucas-ThompsonR. G.GoldbergW. A.PrauseJ. (2010). Maternal work early in the lives of children and its association with achievement and behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 915–942. doi:10.1037/a0020875
46.
MachungA. (1989). Talking career, thinking job: Gender differences in career and family expectations of Berkeley seniors. Feminist Studies, 15, 35–58.
47.
MagnusonK.WaldfogelJ. (2005). Early childhood care and education: Effects on ethnic and racial gaps in school readiness. The Future of Children, 15, 169–196.
48.
McCauleyC.ThangaveluK. (1991). Individual differences in sex stereotyping of occupations and personality traits. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 267–279. doi:10.2307/786655
49.
McWhirterE. H.HackettG.BandalosD. L. (1998). A causal model of the educational plans and career expectations of Mexican American high school girls. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 166–181. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.45.2.166
50.
NiemiecC.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2009). The path taken: Consequences of attaining intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations in post-college life. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 291–306. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.001
51.
OrbuchT. L.EysterS. L. (1997). Division of household labor among Black couples and White couples. Social Forces, 76, 301–332. doi:10.2307/2580327
RosenthalR. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In CooperH.HedgesL. V. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
56.
RuhmC. J. (2004). Parental employment and child cognitive development. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 155–192.
57.
RumbautR. G. (1995). The new Californians: Comparative research findings on the educational progress of immigrant children. In RumbautR. G.CorneliusW. (Eds.), California’s immigrant children: Theory, research, and implications for educational policy (pp. 17–69). San Diego, CA: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
58.
SewellW. H.HauserR. M. (1980). The Wisconsin longitudinal study of social and psychological factors in aspirations and achievement. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 1, 59–99.
59.
SuhS. H. (2007). Too maternal and not womanly enough: Asian-American women’s gender identity conflict. Women & Therapy, 30, 35–50.
60.
SuperD. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In BrownD.BrooksL. (Eds.), Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice (2nd ed., pp. 197–261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61.
SwimJ. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21–36. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.21
62.
SylvesterK. (2001). Caring for our youngest: Public attitudes in the U.S. The Future of Children, 11, 52–61.
63.
WeinshenkerM. W. (2006). Adolescents’ expectations about mothers’ employment: Life course patterns and parental influence. Sex Roles, 54, 845–857.
64.
WenzelA. J.Lucas-ThompsonR. G. (2012). Authenticity in college-aged males and females, how close others are perceived, and mental health outcomes. Sex Roles, 67, 334–350. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0182-y
