Social reactions to disclosures of sexual assault have significant effects on women’s postassault outcomes. The Social Reactions Questionnaire measures these reactions (as reported by survivors) and aggregates them into positive and negative scales. However, studies indicate that only some “negative” reactions have a negative valence for survivors, whereas others produce a mixed (positive and negative) valence. The current study compares a one-primary-factor model of negative reactions to a model with two primary factors that we have labeled “turning against” (TA) and “unsupportive acknowledgment” (UA). Results showed that although one primary factor was plausible, two primary factors provided a better fit to the data. To assess the discriminant validity of the two factors, we performed regressions predicting social support, psychological adjustment, and coping behaviors. Analyses supported the hypotheses that reactions of being turned against were related to social withdrawal, increased self-blame, and decreased sexual assertiveness, whereas reactions of UA were related to both adaptive and maladaptive coping. Against predictions, depression and posttraumatic stress disorder were more related to receiving UA than to receiving TA reactions. Implications for interventions and research are discussed. Importantly, almost all women (94%) in our sample received reactions that acknowledged that an assault occurred but failed to provide support, and this lack of support was associated with worse coping than even more hostile reactions such as being blamed or stigmatized. Therefore, there seems a great need for effective programs to train community members to respond to survivors with the kind of emotional and tangible support that promotes better outcomes.
AhrensC. E. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 263–274.
2.
AhrensC.CabralG.AbelingS. (2009). Healing or hurtful: Sexual assault survivors’ interpretations of social reactions from support providers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 81–94.
3.
AhrensC.CampbellR.Ternier-ThamesK.WascoS.SeflT. (2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of sexual assault survivors’ first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 38–49.
4.
AhrensC. E.StansellJ.JenningsA. (2010). To tell or not to tell: The impact of disclosure on sexual assault survivors' recovery. Violence and Victims, 25, 631–648.
5.
BarrettP. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824.
6.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.
7.
BorjaS. E.CallahanJ. L.LongP. J. (2006). Positive and negative adjustment and social support of sexual assault survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19, 905–914.
8.
BrewinC. R.MacCarthyB.FurnhamA. (1989). Social support in the face of adversity: The role of cognitive appraisal. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 354–372.
9.
CaiL. (2010). A two-tier full-information item factor analysis model with applications. Psychometrika, 75, 581–612.
10.
CampbellR.AhrensC. E.SeflT.WascoS. M.BarnesH. E. (2001). Social reactions to rape victims: Healing and hurtful effects on psychological and physical health outcomes. Violence & Victims, 16, 287–302.
11.
CampbellR.DworkinE.CabralG. (2009). An eco5logical model of the impact of sexual assault on women's mental health. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 225–246.
12.
CarverC. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92–100.
13.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
14.
DonaldC. A.WareJ. E. (1984). The measurement of social support. Research in Community and Mental Health, 4, 325–370.
15.
Dunkel-SchetterC.SkokanL. A. (1990). Determinants of social support provision in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 437–450.
16.
FoaE. B. (1995). Posttraumatic stress diagnostic scale manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
17.
FoynesM. M.FreydJ. J. (2011). The impact of skills training on responses to the disclosure of mistreatment. Violence and Victims, 1, 66–77.
18.
FrazierP. A. (2003). Perceived control and distress following sexual assault: A longitudinal test of a new model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1257–1269.
19.
FrazierP. A.MortensenH.StewardJ. (2005). Coping strategies as mediators of the relations among perceived control and distress in sexual assault survivors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 267–278.
20.
GottmanJ. M.DriverJ. L. (2005). Dysfunctional marital conflict and everyday marital interaction. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 43, 63–77.
21.
GreenB. L.ChungJ. Y.DaroowallaA.KaltmanS.DeBenedictisC. (2006). Evaluating the cultural validity of the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire. ViolenceAgainst Women, 12, 1191–1213.
22.
HoyleR. H. (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
23.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
24.
KatzJ.MayP.SörensenS.DelTostaJ. (2010). Sexual revictimization during women’s first year of college: Self-blame and sexual refusal assertiveness as possible mechanisms. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2113–2126.
25.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
26.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A.WisniewskiN. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.
27.
LittletonH. (2010). The impact of social support and negative disclosure reactions on sexual assault victims: A cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 11, 210–227.
28.
LittletonH.BreitkopfC. R. (2006). Coping with the experience of rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 106–116.
29.
LivingstonJ. A.TestaM.VanZile-TamsenC. (2007). The reciprocal relationship between sexual victimization and sexual assertiveness. Violence Against Women, 13, 1–16.
30.
MatthewsK. C. (2011). Social reactions to disclosure, attributions of responsibility, and shame as predictors of psychological adjustment in sexual assault survivors(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID.
31.
MirowskyJ.RossC. E. (1990). Control or defense? Depression and the sense of control over food and bad outcomes. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 71–86.
32.
MorokoffP. J.QuinaK.HarlowL. L.WhitmireL.GrimleyD. M.GibsonP. R.BurkholderG. J. (1997). Sexual Assertiveness Scale (SAS) for women: Development and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 790–804.
33.
MuganyiziP. S.HogaN. (2009). Social reactions to rape: Experiences and perceptions of women rape survivors and their potential support providers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Violence and Victims, 24, 607–626.
34.
OrchowskiL. (2009). Disclosure of sexual victimization: A prospective study of social reactions and subsequent adjustment(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio University, Athens, OH.
35.
OrchowskiL.UntiedA.GidyczC. (2013). Social reactions to disclosure of sexual victimization and adjustment among survivors of sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 2005–2023.
36.
RevelleW.ZinbargR. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 145–154.
37.
RiniC.Dunkel-SchetterC. (2010). The effectiveness of social support attempts in intimate relationships: ‘T ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it.' In SullivanK.DavilaJ. (Eds.), Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 26–70). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R.ShearinE. N.PierceG. R. (1987). A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 497–510.
39.
SullivanT. P.SchroederJ. A.DudleyD. N.DixonJ. M. (2010). Do differing types of victimization and coping strategies influence the type of social reactions experienced by current victims of intimate partner violence?Violence against women, 16, 638–657.
40.
TestaM.VanZile-TamsenC.LivingstonJ. A.KossM. P. (2004). Assessing women’s experiences of sexual aggression using the Sexual Experiences Survey: Evidence for validity and implications for research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 256–265.
41.
ThoitsP. A. (1986). Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Consulting and ClinicalPsychology, 54, 416–423.
42.
UllmanS. E. (1996). Social reactions, coping strategies, and self–blame attributions in adjustment to sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 505–526.
43.
UllmanS. E. (2000). Psychometric characteristics of the Social Reactions Questionnaire: A measure of reactions to sexual assault victims. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 257–271.
44.
UllmanS. E. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45.
UllmanS. E.FilipasH. H. (2005). Gender differences in social reactions to abuse disclosures, post-abuse coping, and PTSD of child sexual abuse survivors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 767–782.
46.
UllmanS. E.NajdowskiC. J. (2011). Prospective changes in attributions of self-blame and social reactions to women’s disclosures of adult sexual assault. Journal of InterpersonalViolence, 26, 1934–1962.
47.
UllmanS. E.SiegelJ. M. (1995). Sexual assault, social reactions, and physical health. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 1, 289–308.
48.
UllmanS. E.StarzynskiL. L.LongS.MasonG.LongL. M. (2008). Sexual assaultdisclosure, social reactions, and problem drinking in women. Journal of InterpersonalViolence, 23, 1235–1257.
49.
UllmanS. E.TownsendS. M.FilipasH. H.StarzynskiL. L. (2007). Structural models of the relations of assault severity, social support, avoidance coping, self-blame, and PTSD among sexual assault survivors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 23–37.
