The validity and internal reliability for scores on four popular measures of sexist beliefs (the Modern Sexism scale, the Attitudes Toward Women scale, and the Benevolent and Hostile Sexism subscales of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory; collected from 1994 to 1999 with college students) were tested across four U.S. ethnic groups: 174 African American, 357 Asian American, 147 Latina/o American, and 5,629 European American participants. With some caveats, results from internal reliability, correlations among the measures, and mean endorsement indicated that these measures are suitable across the four ethnic groups examined. Caveats are that the Modern Sexism scale may not be a subtle measure of sexist beliefs in African American populations, and the Benevolent Sexism scale may not be adequate for Latina/o and African American participants. Ethnic group differences emerged in mean responses to these two measures. Taken together, these findings aid researchers in the more efficient and accurate usage of these popular measures of sexist beliefs, particularly with African American, Asian American, and Latina/o American respondents.
AndersonS. J.JohnsonJ. T. (2003). The who and when of “gender-blind” attitudes: Predictors of gender-role egalitarianism in two different domains. Sex Roles, 49, 527–532.
2.
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642.
3.
BeckerJ. C. (2010). Why do women endorse hostile and benevolent sexism? The role of salient female subtypes and internalization of sexist contents. Sex Roles, 62, 453–467.
4.
Becker, J. C. & Swim, J. K. (2011). Seeing the unseen: Attention to daily encounters with sexism as way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 227–242.
5.
BuchananN. T.OrmerodA. J. (2002). Racialized sexual harassment in the lives of African American women. Women & Therapy, 25, 107–124.
6.
BuchananN. T.SettlesI. H.WoodsK. C. (2008). Comparing sexual harassment subtypes among Black and White women by military rank: Double jeopardy, the jezebel and the cult of true womanhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 347–361.
7.
CiabattariT. (2001). Changes in men’s conservative gender ideologies: Cohort and period influences. Gender and Society, 15, 574–591.
8.
EckesT.Six-MaternaI. (1998). Denial of discrimination: A scale measuring modern sexism. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 224–238.
9.
EkehammarB.AkramiN.ArayaT. (2000). Development and validation of Swedish classical and Modern Sexism scales. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 307–314.
10.
FrankenbergR. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of Whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
GibbonsJ. L.HambyB. A.DennisW. D. (1997). Researching gender-role ideologies internationally and cross-culturally. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 151–170.
12.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiation hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
13.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.
14.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.,…López W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
15.
GoodJ. J.RudmanL. A. (2010). When female applicants meet sexist interviewers: The costs of being a target of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 481–493.
16.
HarrisR. J.FirestoneJ. M. (1998). Changes in predictors of gender role ideologies among women: A multivariate analysis. Sex Roles, 38, 239–252.
17.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
18.
HuertaM. (2007). Intersections of race and gender in women’s experiences of harassment(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
19.
Johnson-BaileyJ.CerveroR. M. (1996). An analysis of the educational narratives of reentry Black women. Adult Education Quarterly, 46, 142–167.
KaneE. W. (2000). Racial and ethnic variations in gender related attitudes. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 419–439.
22.
LeeE. A.SotoJ. A.SwimJ. K.BernsteinM. J. (2012). Bitter reproach or sweet revenge: Cultural differences in response to racism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 920–932.
23.
LevinS.SinclairS.VeniegasR. C.TaylorP. L. (2002). Perceived discrimination in the context of multiple group memberships. Psychological Science, 13, 557–560.
24.
MoradiB.SubichL. M. (2003). A concomitant examination of the relations of perceived racist and the sexist events to psychological distress for African American women. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 451–469.
25.
MorrisonM. A.MorrisonT. G.PopeG. A.ZumboB. D. (1999). An investigation of measures of modern and old-fashioned sexism. Indicators Research, 48, 39–50.
26.
ParksJ. B.RobertonM. A. (2004). Attitudes toward women mediate the gender effect on attitudes toward sexist language. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 233–239.
27.
RansfordH.MillerJ. (1983). Race, sex, and feminist outlooks. American Sociological Review, 48, 46–59.
28.
SarletM.DumontM.DelacolletteN.DardenneB. (2012). Prescription of protective paternalism for men in romantic and work contexts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 444–457.
29.
SettlesI. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601.
30.
SpenceJ. T.HahnE. D. (1997). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 17–34.
31.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66.
32.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR.StappJ. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219–220.
33.
St. JeanYFeaginJ. K. (1998). Racial masques: Black women and subtle gendered racism. In BenokraitisN. V. (Ed.), Subtle sexism: Current practice and prospects for change (pp. 179–200). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
SwimJ. K.AikenK. J.HallW. S.HunterB. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.
35.
SwimJ. K.BeckerJ. C.LeeE. A.PruittE. R. (2010). Sexism reloaded: Worldwide evidence for its endorsement, expression, and emergence in multiple contexts. In Landrine H.RussoN. (Eds.), Handbook of diversity in feminist psychology (pp. 137–171). New York, NY: Springer.
36.
SwimJ. K.CohenL. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the Attitudes Toward Women and Modern Sexism Scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 103–118.
37.
SwimJ. K.MallettR.Russo-DevosaY.StangorC. (2005). Judgments of sexism: A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments of sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 406–411.
38.
TwengeJ. M. (1997). Attitudes toward women: 1970-1995. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 35–51.
39.
ValdezF. (1997). Queer margins, queer ethics: A call to account for race and ethnicity in the lab, theory, and politics of “sexual orientation.”Hastings Law Journal, 48I, 1293–1341.
40.
WatkinsM. B.KaplanS.BriefA. P.ShullA.DietzJ.MansfieldM.-T.,…Cohen R. (2006). Does it pay to be sexist? The relationship between modern sexism and career outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 524–537.
41.
YoderJ. D.McDonaldT. W. (1997). The generalizability and construct validity of the modern sexism scale: Some cautionary notes. Sex Roles, 36, 655–663.
