AitkenG.BurmanE. (1999). Keeping and crossing professional and racialized boundaries: Implications for feminist practice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 277–297.
2.
AléxL.HammarströmA. (2008). Shift in power during an interview situation: Methodological reflections inspired by Foucault and Bourdieu. Nursing Inquiry, 15, 169–176.
3.
BurrV. (2003). Social constructionism. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
CammarotaJ.FineM. (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
CampbellR.WascoS. M. (2000). Feminist approaches to social science: Epistemological and methodological tenets. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 773–791.
6.
ChmielewskiJ. F.YostM. R. (2013). Psychosocial influences on bisexual women’s body image: Negotiating gender and sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 242–250.
7.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124–130.
9.
DefenbaughN. L. (2008). Under erasure: The absent ill body in doctor-patient dialogue. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 1402–1424.
10.
DilleyP. (2000). Conducting successful interviews: Tips for intrepid research. Theory into Practice, 39, 131–137.
11.
DuBoisB. (1983). Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing and method in feminist social sciences. In BowlesG.KleinR. D. (Eds.), Theories of women’s studies (pp. 105–117). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
12.
EllisC.AdamsT. E.BochnerA. P. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [Forum: Qualitative Social Research], 12. Retrieved fromhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108
13.
EnglandK. V. L. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Professional Geographer, 46, 80–89.
14.
FranklandJ.BloorM. (1999). Some issues arising in the systematic analysis of focus group materials. In Barbour R. S.KitzingerJ. (Eds.), Developing focus group research (pp. 144–155). London, England: Sage.
15.
GarkoM. G. (1999). Existential phenomenology and feminist research: The exploration and exposition of women’s lived experiences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 167–175.
16.
GilbertM. R. (1994). The politics of location: Doing feminist research at “home.”Professional Geographer, 46, 90–96.
17.
GrafanakiS. (1996). How research can change the researcher: The need for sensitivity, flexibility and ethical boundaries in conducting qualitative research in counseling/psychotherapy. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 24, 329–338.
18.
HardingS. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
19.
HarkessS.WarrenC. A. B. (1993). The social relations of intensive interviewing: Constellations of strangeness and science. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 317–339.
Karnieli-MillerO.StrierR.PessachL. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 279–289.
22.
MaxwellJ. A. (1998). Designing a qualitative study. In Bickman L.RogD. S. (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 69–100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
MaysN.PopeC. (1995). Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109–112.
MorrowS. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260.
26.
NashR. (2004). Liberating scholarly writing: The power of personal narrative. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
27.
OakleyA. (1988). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In RobertsH. (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
O’ShaugnessyS.KrogmanN. T. (2012). A revolution reconsidered? Examining the practice of qualitative research in feminist scholarship. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 37, 493–520.
29.
RalphD. (1988). Researching from the bottom: Lesson of participatory research for feminists. In CurrieD. (Ed.), From the margins to the centre: Selected essays in women’s studies research (pp. 134–141). Saskatchewan, Canada: The Women’s Studies Research Unit, University of Saskatchewan.
30.
ReinharzS. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
ReinharzS.ChaseS. (2002). Interviewing women. In Holstein J.GubriumJ. (Eds.), The handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 221–238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
RyanP. (2006). Researching Irish gay male lives: Reflections on disclosure and intellectual autobiography in the production of personal narratives. Qualitative Research, 6, 151–168.
33.
ShieldsV. R.DervinB. (1993). Sense-making in feminist social science research: A call to enlarge the methodological options of feminist studies. Women’s Studies Forum, 16, 65–81.
34.
SmithJ. A.EatoughV. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Lyons E.CoyleA. (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 35–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
SpragueJ. (2005). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. New York, NY: AltaMira Press.
36.
SpragueJ.KobrynowiczD. (2003). A feminist epistemology. In Hesse-Biber S. N.YaiserM. L. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on social research (pp. 78–98). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
StaceyJ. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography?Women’s Studies International Forum, 11, 21–27.
38.
StaceyJ. (1991). Can there be a feminist ethnography? In Gluck S. B.PataiD. (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 111–119). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
TrotterJ.BrogatzkiL.DugganL.FosterE.LevieJ. (2006) Revealing disagreement and discomfort through auto-ethnography and personal narrative. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 369–388.
40.
WilkinsonS. (2004). Focus groups: A feminist method. In Hesse-Biber S. N.YaiserM. L. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on social research (pp. 271–295). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
WolfD. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In WolfD. (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1–55). Boulder, CO: Westview.
42.
WorellJ.EtaughC. (1994). Transforming theory and research with women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 443–450.
43.
ZavosA.BigliaB. (2009). Embodying feminist research: Learning from action research, political practices, diffractions, and collective knowledge. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6, 153–172.