AschA.GellerG. (1996). Feminism, bioethics, and genetics. In WolfS. M. (Ed.), Feminism and bioethics: Beyond reproduction (pp. 318–350). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
BadagliaccoJ.RuizC. (2006). Impoverished Appalachia and Kentucky genomes: What is at stake? How do feminists reply?New Genetics and Society, 25, 209–226.
3.
DickensonD. (2006). Feminist perspectives on human genetics and reproductive technologies. In ClarkeA.TicehurstF. (Eds.), Living with the genome: Ethical and social aspects of human genetics (pp. 286–290). New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.
4.
DillB. T.ZambranaR. E. (Eds.). (2009). Race, class and gender in theory, policy, and practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
EttorreE.Katz RothmanB.SteinbergD. L. (2006). Feminism confronts the genome: An introduction. New Genetics and Society, 25, 133–142.
7.
FaulkC.DolinoyD. C. (2011). Timing is everything: The when and how of environmentally induced changes in the epigenome of animals. Epigenetics, 6, 791–779.
8.
Fausto-SterlingA. (2000, July/August). The five sexes, revisited. Science, 40, 18–23.
HappeK. (1998–1999). The political economy of genetics: Challenges for feminists. Michigan Feminist Studies, 13, 1–13.
11.
MahowaldM. B. (2000). Genes, women, equality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
MarecekJ. (1995). Gender, politics, and psychology's way of knowing. American Psychologist, 3, 162–163.
13.
McLeodC. (2007). For dignity or money: Feminists on the commodification of reproductive labor. In SteinbockB. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics (pp. 258–281). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
PlowsA.BoddingtonP. (2006). Troubles with biocitizenship?Genomics, Society, and Policy, 2, 115–135.
15.
RoughgardenJ. (2009). Evolution’s rainbow: Diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
SalkR.HydeJ. S. (2012). Contemporary genetics for gender researchers: Not your grandma’s genetics anymore. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 395–411.
17.
StaceyM. (1996). The new genetics: A feminist view. In MarteauT.RichardsM. (Eds.), The troubled helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics (pp. 331–349). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Wood-HarperJ.HarrisJ. (1996). Ethics of human genome analysis: Some virtues and vices. In MarteauT.RichardsM. (Eds.), The troubled helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics (pp. 274–294). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
WorellJ.EtaughC. (1994). Transforming theory and research with women: Themes and variations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 443–450.