Policy makers, academics, and media reports suggest that women could shrink the gender pay gap by negotiating more effectively for higher compensation. Yet women entering compensation negotiations face a dilemma: They have to weigh the benefits of negotiating against the social consequences of having negotiated. Research shows that women are penalized socially more than men for negotiating for higher pay. To address this dilemma, the authors test strategies to help women improve both their negotiation and social outcomes in compensation negotiations. In Study 1, communicating concern for organizational relationships improved female negotiators’ social outcomes, and offering a legitimate account for compensation requests improved negotiation outcomes. However, neither strategy—alone or in combination—improved both women’s social and negotiation outcomes. Study 2 tested two strategies devised to improve female negotiators’ social and negotiation outcomes by explaining why a compensation request is legitimate in relational terms. Results showed that, although adherence to the feminine stereotype is insufficient, using these “relational accounts” can improve women’s social and negotiation outcomes at the same time. Normative implications of conformity to gender stereotypes to reduce gender pay disparities are discussed.
AmanatullahE. T.MorrisM. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 256–267.
2.
AmanatullahE. T.MorrisM. W.CurhanJ. R. (2008). Negotiators who give too much: Unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 723–738.
3.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
4.
BaronR. M.KenneyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
5.
BarronL. A. (2003). Ask and you shall receive? Gender differences in negotiators' beliefs about requests for a higher salary. Human Relations, 56, 635–662.
6.
BelliveauM. A. (2005). Blind ambition? The effects of social networks and institutional sex composition on the job search outcomes of elite coeducational and women’s college graduates. Organization Science, 16, 134–141.
7.
BergerJ.FisekM. H.NormanR. Z.ZelditchM. E. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach. New York, NY: Elsevier.
8.
BergkvistL.RossiterJ. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175–184.
9.
BiernatM. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58, 1019–1027.
10.
BiernatM.ManisM.NelsonT. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 485–499.
11.
BiernatM.VescioT. K. (2002). She swings, she hits, she's great, she's benched: Implications of gender-based shifting standards for judgment and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 66–77.
12.
BiesR. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In BazermanM.CarrollJ. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289–319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
13.
BiesR. J.ShapiroD.CummingsL. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault?Communication Research, 15, 381–399.
14.
BlackabyD.BoothA. L.FrankJ. (2005). Outside offers and the gender pay gap: Empirical evidence from the UK academic labour market. Economic Journal, 115, 81–107.
15.
BlumsteinP. W.CarssowK. G.HallJ.HawkinsB.HoffmanR.IshemE.ZimmermanD. L. (1974). The honoring of accounts. American Sociological Review, 39, 551–566.
16.
BobocelD. R.AgarS. E.MeyerJ. P.IrvingP. G. (1998). Managerial accounts and fairness perceptions in conflict resolution: Differentiating the effects of minimizing responsibility and providing justification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 133–143.
17.
BoswellW. R.BoudreauJ. W.DunfordB. B. (2004). The outcomes and correlates of job search objectives: Searching to leave or searching for leverage?Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1083–1091.
18.
BowlesH. R.BabcockL. (2009). Are outside offers an answer to the compensation negotiation dilemma for women?Paper presented at the Academy of Management (Best Paper Proceedings), Chicago, IL.
19.
BowlesH. R.BabcockL.LaiL. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 84–103.
20.
BowlesH. R.BabcockL.McGinnK. L. (2005). Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 951–965.
21.
BowlesH. R.FlynnF. (2010). Gender and persistence in negotiation: A dyadic perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 769–787.
22.
BrettJ. M.StrohL. K. (1997). Jumping ship: Who benefits from an external labor market career strategy?Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 331–341.
23.
BurgessD.BorgidaE. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665–692.
24.
BurtR. S. (1998). The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society, 10, 5–46.
25.
CarliL. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941–951.
26.
CarliL. L.LaFleurS. J.LoeberC. C. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1030–1041.
27.
ChaikenS.EaglyA. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 241–256.
28.
CohenP. N.HuffmanM. L. (2007). Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. American Sociological Review, 72, 681–704.
29.
ConwayM.PizzamiglioM. T.MountL. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25–38.
30.
CurhanJ. R.ElfenbeinH. A.KilduffG. J. (2009). Getting off on the right foot: Subjective value versus economic value in predicting longitudinal job outcomes from job offer negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 524–534.
31.
CurhanJ. R.ElfenbeinH. A.XuH. (2006). What do people care about when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 493–512.
32.
DreherG. F.AshR. A. (1990). A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional, and technical positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 539–546.
33.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
35.
EaglyA. H.SteffenV. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.
36.
FischerA. R.HolzK. B. (2010). Testing a model of women’s personal sense of justice, control, well-being, and distress in the context of sexist discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 297–310.
37.
GeddesD.CallisterR. R. (2007). Crossing the line(s): A dual threshold model of anger in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 721–746.
38.
GelfandM. J.MajorV. S.RaverJ. L.NishiiL. H.O’BrienK. (2006). Negotiating relationally: The dynamics of the relational self in negotiations. Academy of Management Review, 31, 427–451.
39.
GerhartB. (1990). Gender differences in current and starting salaries: The role of performance, college major, and job title. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 43, 418–433.
40.
GerhartB.RynesS. (1991). Determinants and consequences of salary negotiations by male and female MBA graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 256–262.
41.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1999). Sexism and other “isms”: Interdependence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. In SwannW. B.LangloisJ. H.GilbertL. A. (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society (pp. 193–221). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42.
HeilmanM. E. (1980). The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 286–295.
43.
HeilmanM. E.OkimotoT. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92.
44.
HigginsM. C.KramK. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 264–288.
45.
HoffmanC.HurstN. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197–208.
46.
HogueM.DuBoisC. L. Z.Fox-CardamoneL. (2010). Gender differences in pay expectations: The roles of job intention and self-view. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 215–227.
47.
JackmanM. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
JostJ. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387–393.
49.
KamanV. S.HartelC. E. J. (1994). Gender differences in anticipated pay negotiation strategies and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 9, 183–197.
50.
KolbD. M.WilliamsJ. (2000). The shadow negotiation: How women can master the hidden agendas that determine bargaining success. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
51.
KrayL. J.GalinskyA. D.ThompsonL. (2002). Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: An exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 386–409.
52.
KrayL. J.GelfandM. J. (2009). Relief versus regret: The effect of gender and negotiating norm ambiguity on reactions to having one's first offer accepted. Social Cognition, 27, 418–436.
53.
KrayL. J.ThompsonL.GalinskyA. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942–958.
54.
LatuI. M.StewartT. L.MyersA. C.LiscoC. G.EstesS. B.DonahueD. K. (2011). What we “say” and what we “think” about female managers: Explicit versus implicit associations of women with success. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 252–266.
55.
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007) (Ginsburg, J., dissenting).
56.
MajorB. (1989). Gender differences in comparisons and entitlement: Implications for comparable worth. Journal of Social Issues, 45, 99–115.
57.
MajorB.McFarlinD. B.GagnonD. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1399–1412.
58.
MalhotraD.BazermanM. (2007). Negotiation genius: How to overcome obstacles and achieve brilliant results at the bargaining table and beyond. New York, NY: Bantam Dell.
59.
MeekerB. F.Weitzel-O'NeillP. A. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. American Sociological Review, 42, 91–105.
60.
Moss-RacusinC. A.RudmanL. A. (2010). Disruptions in women’s self-promotion: The backlash avoidance model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 186–202.
61.
PinkleyR. L.NorthcraftG. B. (1994). Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute processes and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 193–205.
62.
PinkleyR. L.NorthcraftG. B. (2000). Get paid what you’re worth: The expert negotiator’s guide to salary and compensation. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
63.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 36, 717–731.
64.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
65.
RidgewayC. L. (1978). Conformity, group-oriented motivation, and status attainment in small groups. Social Psychology, 41, 175–188.
66.
RidgewayC. L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47, 76–88.
67.
RidgewayC. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
68.
RidgewayC. L.BourgC. (2004). Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In EaglyA. H.BeallA. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 217–241). New York, NY: Guliford Press.
69.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.
70.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010.
71.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.
72.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
73.
SackettP. R.LarsonJ. R.Jr. (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 419–489). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
74.
SchneiderA. K.TinsleyC. H.CheldelinS. I.AmanatullahE. T. (2010). Likeability v. competence: The impossible choice faced by female politicians, attenuated by lawyers. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 17, 363–384.
75.
ScottM. B.LymanS. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.
76.
ShapiroD. L. (1991). The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 614–630.
77.
ShortJ.WilliamsE.ChristieB. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: John Wiley.
78.
SimonsT. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment netween managers' words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18–35.
79.
SitkinS. B.BiesR. J. (1993). Social accounts in conflict situations: Using explanations to manage conflict. Human Relations, 46, 349–370.
80.
SmallD. A.GelfandM.BabcockL.GettmanH. (2007). Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 600–613.
81.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In LeinhartS. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
82.
SolnickS. J. (2001). Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Economic Inquiry, 39, 189–200.
83.
StevensC. K.BavettaA. G.GistM. E. (1993). Gender differences in the acquisition of salary negotiation skills: The role of goals, self-efficacy, and perceived control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 723–735.
84.
StolbergS. G. (2009). Obama signs equal-pay legislation. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.nytimes.com
85.
TomlinsonE. C.MayerR. C. (2009). The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review, 34, 85–104.
86.
WadeM. E. (2001). Women and salary negotiation: The costs of self-advocacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 65–76.
87.
WaltherJ. B.ParksM. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
WilliamsM. J.PaluckE. L.Spencer-RodgersJ. (2010). The masculinity of money: Automatic stereotypes predict gender differences in estimated salaries. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 7–20.
90.
WeinerB.AmirkhanJ.FolkesV. S.VeretteJ. A. (1987). An attributional analysis of excuse giving: Studies of a naive theory of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 316–324.
