BussD. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.
2.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.
3.
Else-QuestN. M.GrabeS. (2012). The political is personal: Measurement and application of nation-level indicators of gender equity in psychological research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 131–144.
4.
Else-QuestN. M.HydeJ. S.LinnM. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103–127.
5.
EnnsC. Z. (2004). Feminist theories and feminist psychotherapies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Haworth.
6.
FiskeS. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.
7.
FiskeS. T. (2001). Effects of power on bias: Power explains and maintains individual, group, and societal disparities. In Lee-Chai A.BarghJ. (Eds.), The use and abuse of power (pp. 181–193). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
8.
FryerR. G.LevittS. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 210–240.
9.
KaneJ. M.MertzJ. E. (2012). Debunking myths about gender and mathematics performance. Notices of the AMS, 59, 10–21.
MillettK. (1969). Sexual politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
12.
PrattoF.StallworthL. M.SidaniusJ.SiersB. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37–53.
13.
RosenthalL.LevyS. R. (2010). Understanding women’s risk for HIV infection using social dominance theory and the four bases of gendered power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 21–35.
14.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
16.
YoderJ. D.KahnA. S. (1992). Toward a feminist understanding of women and power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 381–388.