AndristL. C. (2008). The implications of objectification theory for women’s health: Menstrual suppression and Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Health Care for Women International, 29, 551–561. doi: 10.1080/07399330801949616
4.
Augustus-HorvathC. L.TylkaT. L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predicts disordered eating: Does women’s age matter?. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 253–265. doi: 10.1037/a0014637
5.
BuchananT. S.FischerA. R.TokarD. M.YoderJ. D. (2008). Testing a culture-specific extension of objectification theory regarding African American women’s body image. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 697–718. doi:10.1177/001100000831632
6.
CalogeroR. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00118.x
7.
CalogeroR. M.PinaA.ParkL. E.RahemtullaZ. (2010). Objectification theory predicts college women’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 63, 32–41. doi: 10.1007/ s11199-010-9759-5
8.
CarrE. R.SzymanskiD. M. (2011). Sexual objectification and substance abuse in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 39–66. doi: 10.1177/0011000010378449
9.
FredricksonB. L. (2009). Positivity. New York, NY: Crown.
10.
FredricksonB. L.HarrisonK. (2005). Throwing like a girl: The effects of self-objectification on adolescent girls’ motor performance. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 29, 79–101. doi: 10.1177/0193723504269878
11.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
12.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A.NollS. M.QuinnD. M.TwengeJ. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269
13.
GapinskiK. D.BrownellK. D.LaFranceM. (2003). Body objectification and “fat talk”: Effects on emotion, motivation, and cognitive performance. Sex Roles, 48, 377–388. doi: 10.1023/A:1023516209973
14.
GayR. K.CastanoE. (2010). My body or my mind: The impact of state and trait objectification on women’s cognitive resources. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 695–703.
15.
GervaisS. J.VescioT. K.AllenJ. (2011). What you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17. doi: 10.1177/0361684310386121
16.
GoldenbergJ. L.RobertsT. A. (2011). The birthmark: An existential account of the objectification of women. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 77–99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
GoldenbergJ. L.CooperD. P.HeflickN. A.RoutledgeC.ArndtJ. (2011). Is objectification always harmful? Reactions to objectifying images and feedback as a function of self-objectification and mortality salience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 443–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.013
18.
HarrellZ. AFredricksonB. L.PomerleauC. S.Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2006). The role of trait self-objectification in smoking among college women. Sex Roles, 54, 735–743. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9041-z
19.
HarrisonK.FredricksonB. L. (2003). Women’s sports media, self-objectification, and mental health in Black and White adolescent females. Journal of Communication, 53, 216–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02587.x
20.
HillM. S.FischerA. R. (2008). Examining objectification theory: Lesbian and heterosexual women’s experiences with sexual–and self-objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 745–776. doi: 10.1177/0011000007301669
21.
HinesS. H.SampselleC. M.RonisD. L.YeoS.FredricksonB. L.BoydC. J. (2007). Women’s self-care agency to manage urinary incontinence: The impact of nursing agency and body experience. Advances in Nursing Science, 30, 175–188.
22.
Johnston-RobledoI.WaresS.FrickerJ.PasekL. (2007). Indecent exposure: Self-objectification and young women’s attitudes toward breastfeeding. Sex Roles, 56, 429–437. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9194-4
23.
KozakM.FrankenhauserH.RobertsT. A. (2009). Objects of desire: Objectification as a function of male sexual orientation. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 225–230. doi: 10.1037/a0016257
24.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00310.x
25.
MercurioA. E.LandryL. J. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being: The impact of self-objectification on women’s overall sense of self-worth and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 58, 458–466. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9357-3
26.
MichalsD. (2003). Stealth feminists: The thirtysomething revolution. In MorganR. (Ed.), Sisterhood is forever: The women’s anthology for a new millennium (pp. 138–144). New York, NY: Washington Square Press.
27.
Miner-RubinoK.TwengeJ. M.FredricksonB. L. (2002). Trait self-objectification in women: Affective and personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 147–172. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.2001.2343
28.
MitchellK. S.MazzeoS. E. (2009). Evaluation of a structural model of objectification theory and eating disorder symptomatology among European American and African American undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 384–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01516.x
29.
MoradiB.HuangY. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
30.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
31.
ParentM. C.MoradiB. (2011). His biceps become him: A test of objectification theory’s application to drive for muscularity and propensity for steroid use in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 246–256. doi:10.1037/a0021398
32.
QuinnD. M.KallenR. W.TwengeJ. M.FredricksonB. L. (2006). The disruptive effect of self-objectification on performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 59–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00262.x
33.
RobertsT. A. (2004). Female trouble: The menstrual self-evaluation scale and women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 22–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00119.x
34.
RobertsT. A.GettmanJ. Y. (2004). Mere exposure: Gender differences in the negative effects of priming a state of self-objectification. Sex Roles, 51, 17–27. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000032306.20462.22
35.
RobertsT. A.GoldenbergJ. L. (2007). Wrestling with nature: An existential perspective on the body and gender in self-conscious emotions. In TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 389–406). New York, NY: Guilford.
36.
SaguyT.QuinnD. M.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2010). Interacting like a body: Objectification can lead women to narrow their presence in social interactions. Psychological Science, 2, 178–182. doi: 10.1177/0956797609357751
37.
SanchezD.BroccoliT. (2008). The romance of self-objectification: Does priming romantic relationships induce states of self-objectification among women?. Sex Roles, 59, 545–554. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9451-1
38.
SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2010). Body image and disordered eating in adolescent girls and boys: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 63, 42–49. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9794-2
39.
SteerA.TiggemannM. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 205–225. doi: 10.1521/ jscp.2008.27.3.20
40.
TolaymatL. D.MoradiB. (2011). U.S. Muslim women and body image: Links among objectification theory constructs and the hijab. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 383–392. doi: 10.1037/a0023461
41.
WisemanM. C.MoradiB. (2010). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 154–166. doi: 10.1037/a0018937