Our study aimed to offer a comprehensive test of the model outlined in objectification theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997). A sample of 116 Australian female undergraduate students completed measures of self-objectification, self-surveillance, body shame, appearance anxiety, internal body awareness, flow, disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning. Simple correlations showed that most variables were related as predicted. Structural equation modeling showed an acceptable level of fit of the data to the theoretical model. Nevertheless, predictive ability was considerably greater for disordered eating than for depressed mood, which in turn was greater than for sexual functioning. Appearance anxiety and body shame emerged as the major mediating variables. The findings provide strong evidence in support of objectification theory. In particular, we concluded that self-objectification plays an important role in the development of mental health issues in young women. Accordingly, intervention strategies that target either societal objectification practices themselves, or educate young women to resist the pressures inherent in these practices that lead to self-objectification, have potentially far-reaching benefits.
American College Health Association. (2009). American College Health Association–National College Health Assessment Spring 2008 reference group data report. Journal of American College Health, 57, 477–488.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Augustus-HorvathC. L.TylkaT. L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predict disordered eating: Does women’s age matter?. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 56, 253–265.
4.
BeckA. T.WardC. H.MendelsonM.MockJ.ErbaughJ. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.
5.
BordoS. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6.
BrownT. A.BarlowD. H. (2009). A proposal for a dimensional classification system based on the shared features of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: Implications for assessment and treatment. Psychological Assessment, 21, 256–271.
7.
CalogeroR. M.PinaA. (2011). Body guilt: Preliminary evidence for a further subjective experience of self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 428–440.
8.
CalogeroR. M.ThompsonJ. K. (2009). Potential implications of the objectification of women’s bodies for women’s sexual satisfaction. Body Image, 6, 145–148.
9.
CashT. F. (2008). The body image workbook (2nd ed.). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
10.
ChenF. F.RussoN. F. (2010). Measurement invariance and the role of body consciousness in depressive symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 405–417.
11.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper.
12.
DaubenmierJ. J. (2005). The relationship of yoga, body awareness, and body responsiveness to self-objectification and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 207–219.
13.
DionK. L.DionK. K.KeelanJ. P. (1990). Appearance anxiety as a dimension of social-evaluative anxiety: Exploring the ugly duckling syndrome. Contemporary Social Psychology, 14, 220–224.
14.
DoveN. L.WiedermanM. W. (2000). Cognitive distraction and women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 67–78.
15.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
16.
GarnerD. M.OlmsteadM. A.PolivyJ. (1983). Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2, 15–34.
17.
GervaisS. J.VescioT. K.AllenJ. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17.
18.
HuL.BentlerP. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.
19.
HolmbeckG. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610.
20.
HurtM. M.NelsonJ. A.TurnerD. L.HainesM. E.RamseyL. R.ErchullM. J.LissM. (2007). Feminism: What is it good for? Feminine norms and objectification as the link between feminist identity and clinically relevant outcomes. Sex Roles, 57, 355–363.
21.
ImpettE. A.HensonJ. M.BreinesJ. G.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2011). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 46–58.
22.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
23.
KristellerJ. L.BaerR. A.Quillian-WoleverR. (2006). Mindfulness-based approaches to eating disorders. In BaerR. A. (Ed.), Mindfulness-based treatment approaches: Clinician’s guide to evidence base and applications (pp. 75–91). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
LevineM. P.MurnenS. K. (2009). “Everybody knows that mass media are/are not [pick one] a cause of eating disorders”: A critical review of evidence for a causal link between media, negative body image, and disordered eating in females. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 9–42.
25.
MastersW. H.JohnsonV. E. (1970). Human sexual inadequacy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
26.
McKinleyN. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem: The mediating effect of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39, 113–123.
27.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.
28.
Miner-RubinoK.TwengeJ. M.FredricksonB. L. (2002). Trait self-objectification in women: Affective and personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 147–172.
29.
MoradiB.DirksD.MattesonA. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of sociocultural standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: An examination and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428.
30.
MoradiB.HuangY. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.
31.
MuehlenkampJ. J.Saris-BaglamaR. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379.
32.
MuehlenkampJ. J.SwansonJ. D.BrauschA. M. (2005). Self-objectification, risk taking, and self-harm in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 24–32.
33.
MyersT. A.CrowtherJ. H. (2008). Is self objectification related to introceptive awareness? An examination of potential mediating pathways to disordered eating attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 172–180.
34.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectifcation, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.
35.
PeatC. M.MuehlenkampJ. J. (2011). Self-objectification, disordered eating, and depression: A test of meditational pathways. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 441–450.
36.
PiranN. (2001). Re-inhabiting the body from the inside out: Girls transform their school environment. In TolmanD. L.Brydon-MillerM. (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretative and participatory methods (pp. 218–238). New York, NY: NYU Press.
37.
RosenR.BrownC.HeimanJ.LeiblumS.MestonC.ShabsighR.D’AgostinoR. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.
38.
SchoemakerC.van StrienT.van der StaakC. (1994). Validation of the eating disorder inventory in a nonclinical population using transformed and untransformed scores. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 15, 387–393.
39.
SteerA.TiggemannM. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 205–225.
40.
SzymanskiD. M.HenningS. L. (2007). The role of self-objectification in women’s depression: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 56, 45–53.
41.
TiggemannM.KuringJ. K. (2004). The role of objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–312.
42.
TiggemannM.LynchJ. E. (2001). Body image across the life span in adult women: The role of self-objectification. Developmental Psychology, 37, 243–253.
43.
TiggemannM.SlaterA. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64.
44.
TylkaT. L.HillM. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730.
45.
WiedermanM. W. (2000). Women’s body image self-consciousness during physical intimacy with a partner. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 60–79.
46.
ZungW. W. K. (1986). Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and Depression Status Inventory. In SantoriusN. BanT. A. (Eds.), Assessment of depression (pp. 221–231). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
