AmirM. (1971). In Patterns of forcible rape. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AndersM. C.ChristopherF. S. (2011). A socioecological model of rape survivors' decisions to aid in case prosecution. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 92–106. doi: 10.1177/0361684310394802
3.
ArmstrongE. Q.HamiltonL.EnglandP. (2010). Is hooking up bad for young women?. Contexts, 9, 22–27.
4.
BartP. (1979). Rape as a paradigm of sexism in society: Victimization and its discontents. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 2, 347–357. doi: 10.1016/S0148-0685(79) 91564-1
5.
BletzerK. V.KossM. P. (2004). Narrative constructions of sexual violence as told by female rape survivors' populations of the southwestern United States: Scripts of coercion, scripts of consent. Medical Anthropology, 23, 113–156. doi: 10.1080/01459740490448911
6.
BohnerG.SieblerF.SchmelcherJ. (2006). Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men’s rape proclivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 286–297. doi: 10.1177/0146167205280912
7.
BrownmillerS. (1975). In Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
8.
BurgessA. W.HolmstromL. L. (1974). Crisis and counseling requests of rape victims. Journal of Nursing Research, 12, 196–202.
9.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
10.
CohenN. (2011, January30). Define gender gap? Look up Wikipedia’s contributor list. The New York Times. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nytimes.com
11.
CookS. L.KossM. P. (2005). More data have accumulated supporting date and acquaintance rape as significant problems for women. In LoeskeD. L.GellesR. J.CavanaughM. M. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 97–112). 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
CookS. S.GidyczC.KossM. P.MurphyM. (2011). Emerging issues in the measurement of rape victimization. Violence Against Women, 17, 201–218.
13.
DalyK.BouhoursB. (2010). Rape and attrition in the legal process; A comparative analysis of five countries. Criminal Justice: A Review of Research, 39, 565–650.
14.
FisherB. S. (2009). The effects of survey question wording on rape estimates: Evidence from a quasi-experimental design. Violence Against Women, 15, 133–147. doi: 10.1177/1077801208329391
15.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T. (2000). Measuring the sexual victimization of women: Evolution, current controversies and future research. Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, 4, 317–390.
16.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. (2000). In The sexual victimization of college women (NCJ No. 182369). Washington, DC:: National Institute of Justice.
17.
FisherB. S.DaigleL. E.CullenF. T. (2003). Acknowledging sexual victimization as rape: Results from a national-level study. Justice Quarterly, 20, 535–574. doi: 10.1080/07418820300095611
18.
GilbertN. (1991a). The phantom epidemic of sexual assault. Public Interest, 103, 54–65.
19.
GilbertN. (1991b, June 27). The campus rape scare. Wall Street Journal, p. A14.
20.
GilbertN. (1997). Advocacy research and social policy. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 101–148). Vol. 22, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
GilbertN. (2005). Advocacy research overstates the incidence of date and acquaintance rape. In LoesekeD. R.GellesF. J.CavanaughM. M. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 117–130). 2nd ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hoff SommersC. (1994). In Who stole feminism? How women have betrayed women. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
24.
KaninE. J. (1957). Male aggression in dating-courtship relations. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 197–204. doi: 10.1086/222177
25.
KilpatrickD. G.ResnickH. S.RugieroK. J.ConsoscentiL. M.McCauleyJ. (2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf
26.
KossM. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00872.x
27.
KossM. P. (2009). Restorative justice for acquaintance rape and misdemeanor sex crimes. In PtacekJ. (Ed.), Feminism, restorative justice, and violence against women (pp. 218–238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
KossM. P.AbbeyA.CampbellR.CookS.NorrisJ.TestaM.WhiteJ. (2007). The revised sexual experiences survey. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 357–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
29.
KossM. P.BacharK.HopkinsC. Q.CarlsonC. (2004). Expanding a community’s justice response to sex crimes through advocacy, prosecutorial, and public health collaboration: Introducing the RESTORE program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1435–1463.
30.
KossM. P.DineroT. E.SeibelC.CoxS. (1988). Stranger, acquaintance, and date rape: Is there a difference in the victim’s experience?. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00924.x
31.
KossM. P.GidyczC. J.WisniewskiN. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among a national sample of students in higher education. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162
32.
KossM. P.OrosC. J. (1982). The sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and sexual victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.50.3.455
33.
KossM. P.WhiteJ. W. (2008). National and global agendas on violence against women: Historical perspective and consensus. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78, 386–393. doi: 10.1037/a0014347
34.
KossM. P.WhiteJ.KazdinA. E. (2011). Violence against women and children: Perspectives and next steps. In KossM.WhiteJ.KazdinA. (Eds.), Violence against women and children (pp. 261–306). Vol. 2, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/12308-013
35.
National Partnership to End Interpersonal Violence Across the Lifespan. (2010). Retrieved fromhttp://www.uncg.edu/psy/npeiv/
36.
RoipheK. (1994). In The morning after: Sex, fear, and feminism. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
37.
UllmanS. E.TownsendS. M.FilipasH. H.StarzynskiL. L. (2007). Structural models of the relations of assault severity, social support, avoidance coping, self-blame, and PTSD among sexual assault survivors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 23–37.
38.
WalkerM. J.BrodskyS. L. (Eds.). (1976). Sexual assault: The victim and the rapist. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
39.
WandersmanA.DuffyJ.FlaspohlerP.NoonanR.LubellK.StillmanL.SaulJ. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–181. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z
40.
WarshawR. (with afterword by M. P. Koss). (1988/1994). In I never called it rape: The Ms. report on recognizing, fighting, and surviving date and acquaintance rape. New York, NY: Harper-Collins.
41.
WeisK.BorgesS. (1973). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. Issues in Criminology, 8, 71–115.
42.
WhiteJ.KossM. P.KazdinA. (2011). Conclusions and next steps. In WhiteJ.KossM. P.KazdinA. (Eds.), Violence against women and girls: Mapping the problem (pp. 287–310). Vol. 1, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43.
YuanN.P.EavesE.R.KossM.P.PolaccaM.BletzerK.GoldmanD. (2010). Something like the common cold: Community perceptions of American Indian drinking. Substance Abuse and Management, 45, 1909–1929
44.
YuanN.KossM. P.PolaccaM.GoldmanD. (2006). Risk factors for rape and physical assault among Native American tribes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1556–1590. doi: 10.1177/0886260506294239