BeckerH. S. (1967). Whose side are we on?Social Problems, 14, 239–247. doi:10.1525/ sp.1967.14.3.03a00010
2.
BohanJ. S. (Ed.). (1992). Seldom seen, rarely heard: Women’s place in psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3.
BohanJ. S. (1993). Essentialism, constructionism, and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 5–21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00673.x
BussA. R. (1975). The emerging field of the sociology of psychological knowledge. American Psychologist, 30, 988–1002. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.30.10.988
6.
BussA. R. (1978). The structure of psychological revolutions. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14, 57–64. doi:10.1002/1520-6696(197801)14:1<57::AID-JHBS2300140109>3.0.CO;2-7
7.
LorberJ. (1986). Dismantling Noah’s Ark. Sex Roles, 14, 567–580. doi:10.1007/BF00287688
8.
LorberJ. (1995). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
MarecekJ. (1995). Psychology and feminism: Can this relationship be saved?. In StantonD. C.StewartA. J. (Eds.), Feminisms in the academy (pp. 101–132). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
MorawskiJ. G. (1990). Toward the unimagined: Feminism and epistemology in psychology. In Hare-MustinR.MarecekJ. (Eds.), Making a difference: Representations of gender in psychology (pp. 150–183). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
MorawskiJ. G. (1994). Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology: Notes on a liminal science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12.
ParleeM. B. (1975). Review essay: Psychology. Signs, 1, 119–138. doi:10.1086/493210
13.
PayerM. E. (1977, April). Is traditional scholarship value free? Toward a critical theory. Paper presented at the symposium “The Scholar and the Feminist IV,” Barnard College, New York.
14.
RigerS. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist, 47, 730–740. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.6.730
15.
RutherfordA. (2010). Responsible opposition, disruptive voices: Science, social change, and the history of feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 460–473. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01596.x
16.
SherifC. W. (1979). Bias in psychology. In ShermanJ. A.BeckE. T. (Eds.), The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 93–133). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
17.
StewartA. J.DottoloA. L. (2006). Feminist psychology. Signs, 31, 493–509. doi:10.1086/491683
18.
UngerR. K. (1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychologist, 34, 1085–1094. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.11.1085
19.
UngerR. K. (1981). Sex as a social reality: Field and laboratory research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 645–653. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00603.x
20.
UngerR. K. (1982). Advocacy versus scholarship revisited: Issues in the psychology of women.Psychology of Women Quarterly7, 5–17. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1982. tb00605.x
21.
UngerR. K. (1983). Through the looking glass: No Wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 9–32. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1983.tb00614.x
22.
UngerR. K. (1998). Resisting gender: Twenty-five years in/of feminist psychology. London, England: Sage.
23.
UngerR. K. (2004). Evaluating impact: A critical perspective. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 40, 433–435. doi:10.1002/jhbs.20035
24.
UngerR. K.SheeseK.MainA. (2010). Feminism and women leaders in SPSSI: Social networks, ideology, and generational change. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 474–485. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01597.x
25.
WallstonB. S. (1981). What are the questions in the psychology of women?. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 591–617. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00599.x
26.
WeissteinN. (1968). Kinder, Kirche, and Kuche as scientific law: Psychology constructs the female. Boston, MA: New England Free Press.
27.
WittigM. A. (1985). Metatheoretical dilemmas in the psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 40, 800–811. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.800