BohanJ. S. (1993). Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism, and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 5–21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00673.x
2.
BowlegL. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z
3.
BullockH. E.LottB.TruongS. V. (2010). SPSSI and poverty: Reflections at seventy-five. Journal of Social Issues, 67(1).
4.
CampbellR.SchramP. J. (1995). Feminist research methods: A content analysis of psychology and social science textbooks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 85–106. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00280.x
5.
ColeE. R. (2008). Coalitions as a model for intersectionality: From practice to theory. Sex Roles, 59, 443–453. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9419-1
6.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180. doi:10.1037/a0014564
7.
CrawfordM.KimmelE. (1999). Promoting methodological diversity in feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 1–6. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00337.x
8.
CrawfordM.MarecekJ. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female, 1968-1988. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147–165. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb00993.x
9.
DenmarkF.RussoN. F.FriezeI. H.SechzerJ. A. (1988). Guidelines for avoiding sexism in psychological research: A report of the ad hoc committee on nonsexist research. American Psychologist, 43, 582–585. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.7.582
10.
GaveyN. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459–475. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb01014.x
11.
GaveyN. (2002). To and beyond the discursive constitution of subjectivity. Feminism & Psychology, 12, 432–438. doi:10.1177/0959353502012004004
12.
GergenK. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309–320. doi:10.1037/h0034436
13.
GergenM. M. (1988). Toward a feminist metatheory and methodology in the social sciences. In GergenM. M. (Ed.), Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge (pp. 87–104). New York: New York University Press.
14.
GradyK. E. (1981). Sex bias in research design. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 628–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00601.x
15.
HardingS. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
HenriquesJ.HollwayW.UrwinC.VennC.WalkerdineV. (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
17.
KatzP. A. (1991). Woman, psychology, and social issues research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 665–676. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00438.x
18.
MarecekJ. (1989). Introduction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 367–377. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb01008.x
19.
MarecekJ.KimmelE. B.CrawfordM.Hare-MustinR. T. (2003). Psychology of women and gender. In FreedheimD. K. (Ed.), Handbook of psychology, Volume 1: History of psychology (pp. 249–268). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
20.
McHughM. D.KoeskeR. D.FriezeI. H. (1986). Issues to consider in conducting nonsexist feminist research. American Psychologist, 41, 879–890. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.8.879
21.
MiesM. (1983). Toward a methodology for feminist research. In BowlesG.KleinR. D. (Eds.), Theories of women’s studies (pp. 117–139). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
22.
MilgramS. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18, 57–76. doi:10.1177/001872676501800105
23.
MorawskiJ. (1997). The science behind feminist research methods. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 667–681. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02455.x
24.
MorawskiJ. G. (1994). Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology: Notes on a liminal science. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
25.
O’LearyV. E. (1981). Feminist research: Problems and prospects. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 595–596. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00598.x
26.
ParleeM. B. (1975). Psychology. Signs, 1, 119–138. doi:10.1086/493210
27.
ParleeM. B. (1979). Psychology and women. Signs, 5, 121–133. doi:10.1086/493688
28.
PepitoneA. (1981). Lessons from the history of social psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 972–985. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.36.9.972
29.
PeplauL. A.ConradE. (1989). Beyond nonsexist research: The perils of feminist methods in psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 379–400. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb01009.x
30.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
31.
ReidP. T. (1993). Poor women in psychological research: Shut up and shut out. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 133–150. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00440.x
32.
ReinharzS. (1979). On becoming a social scientist. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
ReinharzS. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
RigerS. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist, 47, 730–740. doi:10.1037/0003-066X. 47.6.730
35.
RutherfordA.GranekL. (2010). Emergence and development of the psychology of women. In ChrislerJ.McCrearyD. (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 19–41). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_2
36.
RutherfordA.Vaughn-BlountK.BallL. C. (2010). Responsible opposition, disruptive voices: Science, activism, and the history of feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 460–473. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01596.x
37.
SarisR. N.Johnston-RobledoI. (2000). Poor women are still shut out of mainstream psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 233–235. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00204.x
38.
SherifC. W. (1979). Bias in psychology. In ShermanJ. A.BeckE. T. (Eds.), The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 93–133). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
39.
SherifM. (1977). Crisis in social psychology: Some remarks towards breaking through the crisis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 368–382. doi:10.1177/014616727700300305
40.
ShieldsS. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8
41.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. L. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 667–668.
42.
TwengeJ. M. (1997). Attitudes toward women: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 35–51. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00099.x
43.
UngerR. K. (1983). Through the looking glass: No wonderland yet! (the reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 9–32. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1983.tb00614.x
44.
UngerR. K.SheeseK.MainA. S. (2010). Feminism and women leaders in SPSSI: Social networks, ideology, and generational change. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 474–485. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01597.x
45.
WallstonB. S. (1981). What are the questions in the psychology of women? A feminist approach to research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 597–617. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00599.x
46.
WallstonB.GradyK. E. (1985). Integrating the feminist critique and the crisis in social psychology: Another look at research methods. In O’LearyV. E.UngerR. K.WallstonB. S. (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 7–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47.
WeissteinN. (1971). Psychology constructs the female. Journal of Social Education, 35, 362–373.
48.
WilkinsonS. (1986). Sighting possibilities: Diversity and commonality in feminist research. In WilkinsonS. (Ed.), Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice (pp. 7–24). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
49.
WorellJ.EtaughC. (1994). Transforming theory and research with women: Themes and variations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 443–450. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01041.x