Managers' Beliefs about the Glass Ceiling: Interpersonal and Organizational Factors

Abstract

The glass ceiling refers to the difficulty of women trying to be promoted into the top management levels. The present study examined managers' potential explanations, implicit or explicit, for why women rarely reach the top hierarchical levels in their own organization. Among 685 managers at a large Midwestern insurance company, a model was supported in which beliefs about interpersonal and situational variables in the organization were related to the perception that men and women were treated differently overall, which, in turn, was related to the belief that a glass ceiling existed. The model was not different for male and female managers, but women tended to perceive that each element of the model existed to a greater extent than men did.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agars

M. D.

(2004). Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 103–111.

Albrecht

(1983). Earth and sky—a meeting of minds: Getting through to people with mind-to-mind communication. Training and Development, 37, 70–75.

Allen

Eby

Poteet

Lentz

Lima

(2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127–136.

Anderson

J. C.

Gerbing

D. W.

(1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

Aycan

(2004). Key success factors for women in management in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 453–477.

Beehr

T. A.

Juntunen

D. L.

(1990). Promotions and employees' perceived mobility channels: The effects of employee sex, employee group, and initial placement. Human Relations, 43, 455–472.

Beehr

T. A.

Nair

V. N.

Gudanowski

D. M.

Such

(2004). Perceptions of reasons for promotion of self and others. Human Relations, 57, 413–437.

Beehr

T. A.

Taber

T. D.

(1993). Perceived intra-organizational mobility: Reliable versus exceptional performance as means to getting ahead. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 1–16.

Bentler

P. M.

(1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

10.

Bentler

P. M.

Bonnet

D. G.

(1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

11.

Catalyst. (2004a). The bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and gender diversity. Retrieved June 19, 2009, from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/82/the-bottom-line-connecting-corporate-performance-and-gender-diversity.

12.

Catalyst. (2004b). Women and men in U.S. corporate leadership: Same workplace, different realities? Retrieved June 19, 2009, from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/145/women-and-men-in-us-corporate-leadership-same-workplace-different-realities.

13.

Catalyst. (2005). Women “take care,” men “take charge”: Stereotyping of U.S. business leaders exposed. Retrieved June 19, 2009, from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/94/women-take-care-men-take-charge-stereotyping-of-us-business-leaders-exposed.

14.

Catalyst. (2006). 2005 Catalyst census of women corporate officers and top earners of the fortune 500. Retrieved June 19, 2009, from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/263/2005-catalyst-census-of-women-corporate-officers-and-top-earners-of-the-fortune-500.

15.

de Janasz

S. C.

Sullivan

S. E.

Whiting

(2003). Mentor networks and career success: Lessons for turbulent times. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 78–91.

16.

Dreher

G. F.

Ash

R. A.

(1990). A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional, and technical positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 539–546.

17.

Eagly

A. H.

(2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1–12.

18.

Jaccard

Wan

C. K.

(1995). Measurement error in the analyses of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348–357.

19.

Joreskog

K. G.

Sorbom

(1989). SPSS LISREL VII and PRELIS user's guide and reference. Chicago: SPSS.

20.

Joy

(2008). Advancing women leaders: The connection between women board directors and women corporate officers. Retrieved September 19, 2008, from http://www.catalyst.org/page/64/browse-research-knowledge.

21.

Kilian

C. M.

Hukai

McCarty

C. E.

(2005). Building diversity in the pipeline to corporate leadership. The Journal of Management Development, 24, 155–168.

22.

Kline

R. B.

(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

23.

Kottke

J. L.

Agars

M. D.

(2005). Understanding the processes that facilitate and hinder efforts to advance women in organizations. Career Development International, 10, 190–202.

24.

Lochhead

(2008, June 8). Clinton vows to work hard to get Obama elected. The San Francisco Chronicle, p. A1.

25.

Lyness

K. S.

Heilman

M. E.

(2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777–785.

26.

Pazy

(1992). Sex-linked bias in promotion decisions: The role of candidate's career relevance and respondent's prior experience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 209–228.

27.

Plake

B. S.

Murphy-Berman

Derscheid

L. E.

Gerber

R. W.

Miller

S. K.

Speth

C. A.

(1987). Access decisions by personnel directors: Subtle forms of sex bias in hiring. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 255–264.

28.

Raabe

Beehr

T. A.

(2003). Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationship: Differences in perception and impact. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 271–293.

29.

Ragins

B. R.

Townsend

Mattis

(1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. The Academy of Management Executive, 12, 28–42.

30.

Ryan

M. K.

Haslam

S. A.

(2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549–572.

31.

Scandura

T. A.

(1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 169–174.

32.

Schuck

Liddle

B. J.

(2004). The female manager's experience: A concept map and assessment tool. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 56, 75–87.

33.

Steiger

J. G.

(1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.

34.

Stroh

L. K.

Brett

J. M.

Reilly

A. H.

(1996). Family structure, glass ceiling, and traditional explanations for the differential rate of turnover of female and male managers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 99–118.

35.

Thompson

Daniel

(1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197–208.

36.

Turban

D. B.

Dougherty

T. W.

Lee

F. K.

(2002). Gender, race, and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships: The moderating role of relationship duration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 240–262.

37.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2006). Women in the labor force: A databook. Introduction and highlights. Retrieved November 21, 2006, from http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook2006.htm.

38.

U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). A report on the glass ceiling initiative (Publication No. DOC L1.2:G46). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

39.

U.S. Department of Labor. (1992). Pipelines of progress: A status report on the glass ceiling (Publication No. DOC L1.2:G46 update). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.