Professional women's identity integration—the perceived compatibility between work and gender identities—plays a role in how task or relationship information is processed. Seventy female business school students were primed with either their professional or their gender identity. Business women with higher identity integration showed an assimilation effect to the primed cue. Specifically, they showed higher task orientation than relationship orientation in a recognition task when primed with their professional identity, but less so when primed with their gender identity. Business women with lower identity integration showed a contrast effect to the primed cue: Their recognition reflected a task-relationship orientation opposite to the primed cue. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding women's performance at work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerN. T.IzraeliD. (1994). Competitive frontiers: Women managers in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AshforthB. E.JohnsonS. A. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In HoggM. A.TerryD. J. (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 31–48). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
4.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
5.
Benet-MartinezV.HaritatosJ. (2005). Bicultural identity integration (BII): Components and psychological antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73, 1015–1050.
6.
Benet-MartinezV.LeeF.LeuJ. (2006). Biculturalism and cognitive complexity: Expertise in cultural representations. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 37, 386–407.
7.
Benet-MartinezV.LeuJ.LeeF.MorrisM. W. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism. Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3, 492–516.
8.
BerryJ. W. (1990). Psychology of acculturation. In GoldbergerN. R.VeroffJ. B. (Eds.), The culture and psychology reader (pp. 457–488). New York: New York University Press.
BurgessD.BorgidaE. (1999). Who women are, who women should be. Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665–692.
11.
ChengC.-Y.LeeF. (under review). Who is your in-group? Shift of cultural identity and ingroup favoritism tendency. New York: Columbia University Graduate School of Business.
12.
ChengC.-Y.LeeF.Benet-MartinezV. (2006). Assimilation and contrast effects in cultural frame switching: Bicultural identity integration and valence of cultural cues. Journal of Cross Cultural Research, 37, 597–622.
13.
CohenC. E. (1981). Person categories and social perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 441–452.
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
DeauxK.LaFranceM. (1998). Gender. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 788–827). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
16.
DonahueE. M.RobinsR. W.RobertsB. W.JohnO. P. (1993). The divided self: Concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 834–846.
17.
DownieM.KoestnerR.ElgelediS.CreeK. (2004). The impact of cultural internalization and integration on well-being among tricultural individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 305–314.
18.
DriscollD.GoldbergC. R. (1993). Members of the club: The coming of age of executive women. New York: Free Press.
19.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
EaglyA. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145–158.
21.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. T. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice towards female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
22.
Firth-CozensJ. (1991). Women doctors. In Firth-CozensJ.WestM. (Eds.), Women at work: Psychological and organizational perspectives (pp. 131–142). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
23.
FiskeS. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 357–414). New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
FiskeS. T. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
25.
FoxM. F.Hesse-BiberS. (1984). Women at work. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
26.
GherardiS. (1995). Gender, symbolism and organizational cultures. London: Sage.
27.
GlaserJ.BanajiM. R. (1999). When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 669–687.
28.
HaritatosJ.Benet-MartinezV. (2002). Bicultural identities: The interface of cultural, personality, and socio-cognitive processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 3, 598–606.
29.
HeilmanM. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. In StawB. M.CummingsL. I. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 269–298). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30.
HerrP. M.ShermanS. J.FazioR. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323–340.
31.
HofstedeG. (1994). Management scientists are human. Management Science, 40, 4–13.
32.
HongY.MorrisM. W.ChiuC.Benet-MartínezV. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709–720.
33.
HoodJ. N.KobergC. S. (1994). Patterns of differential assimilation and acculturation for women in business organizations. Human Relations, 47, 159–182.
34.
JacksonL. A.CashT. F. (1985). Components of gender stereotypes: Their implications for inferences on stereotypic and nonstereotypic dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 326–344.
35.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
36.
LinvilleP. W. (1987). Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 663–676.
37.
LiptonM. (1986). Successful women in a man's world: The myth of managerial androgyny. In MooreL. L. (Ed.), Not as far as you think (pp. 163–180). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
38.
LondonC. G. (2004). A qualitative study of women in male-dominated careers: Young women's experience of their mothers' conflict about dual roles and how it affects their conflict about working and parenting. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 65 (2), 727.
39.
MarshallJ. (1984). Women managers: Travelers in a male world. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
40.
MillerG. E. (2004). Frontier masculinity in the oil industry: The experience of women engineers. Gender, Work and Organizations, 11, 47–73.
41.
PhillipsS. D.LittleB. R.GoodineL. A. (1997). Reconsidering gender and public administration: Five steps beyond conventional research. Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique du Canada, 40, 563–581.
42.
PrattM. G.RockmannK. W.KaufmannJ. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 235–262.
43.
RimerS.HealyP. (2005, February 18). Furor lingers as Harvard Chief gives details of talk on women. New York Times, p. A1.
44.
RoccasS.BrewerM. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106.
45.
ScheinV. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675–688.
46.
SherifM.HovlandC. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
SimpsonS. M. (1991). Women entrepreneurs. In Firth-CozensJ.WestM. (Eds.), Women at work. Psychological and organizational perspectives (pp. 113–130). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
48.
StangorC.LynchL.DuanC.GlassB. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 207–218.
49.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies on social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
TrahanA.LeeF. (2004, September). Extending the identity integration model to the workplace: The experience of women in male-dominated fields. Presentation at The University of Michigan Organizational Psychology Brown Bag, Ann Arbor, MI.
51.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2008). Current population survey. Table 11: Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Retrieved August 7, 2008, from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaatll.pdf.
