Measuring and Estimating Congestion Using Travel Time

Abstract

Procedures are presented for measuring and estimating roadway congestion levels. An assessment of users, uses, and audiences indicates a need for congestion measures that are understood by nontechnical audiences, yet are rigorous enough for technical analyses. Travel time–based measurements are deemed most useful for this wide range of needs. Data collected for an NCHRP project were used to identify the number of travel time observations and roadway segments required for reliable estimates of congestion through direct data collection. The data and previous congestion studies were used to develop surrogate procedures that can estimate congestion statistics with readily available traffic count and roadway inventory data. The surrogate estimation procedures were developed to assist agencies when direct data collection is not practical or feasible. Both of these processes—direct measurement and estimation of travel time–related quantities—are important for quantifying congestion.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Levinson

H. S.

, Pratt

R. H.

, Bay

P. N.

, and Douglas

G. B.

. Quantifying Congestion: Interim Report. NCHRP, Texas Transportation Institute, Oct. 1992.

Lomax

T. J.

, Turner

S. M.

, Shunk

, Levinson

H. S.

, Pratt

R. H.

, Bay

P. N.

, and Douglas

G. B.

. Quantifying Congestion: Final Report. NCHRP, Jan. 1995.

Lomax

T. J.

, Turner

S. M.

, Shunk

, Levinson

H. S.

, Pratt

R. H.

, Bay

P. N.

, and Douglas

G. B.

. Quantifying Congestion: Users Guide. NCHRP, Jan. 1995.

Federal Register. Part II, Department of Transportation, FHWA, 23 CFR Parts 500 and 526; Federal Transit Administration, 49 CFR Part 614, Dec. 1, 1993.

Robertson

H. D.

(ed.). Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1994.

Turner

S. M.

Advanced Techniques for Travel Time Data Collection. Proc., 1995 Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, Seattle, Wash., Aug. 1995.

Liu

T. K.

Field Tests of Travel Time Survey Methodologies and Development of a Standardized Data Processing and Reporting System. Presented at National Traffic Data Acquisition Conference, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass., Sept. 1994.

Bailey

M. D.

, and Rawling

F. G.

. A Computerized Travel Time Study for Northeastern Illinois: Methodology and Commentary. Working Paper 91-01. Chicago Area Transportation Study, Chicago, Ill., June 1991.

Rickman

T. D.

, Hallenbeck

M. E.

, and Schroeder

. Improved Method for Collecting Travel Time Information. In Transportation Research Record 1271, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 79–88.

10.

Turner

S. M.

, Naples

C. J.

III , and Henk

R. H.

. Travel Time Reliability of HOV Facilities. In 1994 Compendium of Technical Papers, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1994.

11.

Shuldiner

P. W.

Acquisition and Analysis of License Plate Data Using Video and Machine Vision Technology. Presented at the National Traffic Data Acquisition Conference, University of Massachusetts, Sept. 1994.

12.

Levine

S. Z.

, McCasland

W. R.

, and Smalley

D. G.

. Development of a Freeway Traffic Management Project Through a Public-Private Partnership. In Transportation Research Record 1394, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 26–31.

13.

Robinson

J. R.

, Ewald

R. C.

, Gravely

T. B.

, and Carter

. Capital IVHS Operational Test. ITE Compendium of Technical Papers, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1993.

14.

Levine

S. Z.

, and McCasland

W. R.

. Monitoring Freeway Traffic Conditions with Automatic Vehicle Identification Systems. ITE Journal, March 1994, pp. 23–28.

15.

Hallenbeck

M. E.

, Boyle

, and Ring

. Use of Automatic Vehicle Identification Techniques for Measuring Traffic Performance and Performing Incident Detection. Report WA-RD 273.1 (TNW 91-11). Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Oct. 1992.

16.

Perkinson

D. G.

Using Automated Vehicle Location Data to Monitor Congestion: Fuzzy Set Theory. ITE Journal, Feb. 1994, pp. 35–40.

17.

Center for Urban Transportation Research. Automatic Vehicle Location for Measurement of Corridor Level of Services: The Miami Method. University of South Florida, Tampa, Sept. 1994.

18.

Ewing

Roadway Levels of Service in an Era of Growth Management. In Transportation Research Record 1364, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 63–70.

19.

Systems Responses—Traffic Signals and Air Quality. Regional Planning Agency of South Central Connecticut, 1982.

20.

Margiotta

, Cohen

, Morris

, Elkins

, Venigalla

, and Rathi

. Speed Determination Models for the Highway Performance Monitoring System. FHWA Contract OTFH61-92-R-00022. Science Applications International Corporation, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd., and University of Tennessee, Oct. 1993.

Measuring and Estimating Congestion Using Travel Time–Based Procedures

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References