Discussed here are the three major aspects of design excellence— science, technology, and aesthetics—with particular emphasis on aesthetics. Although generally applicable to all visible engineered structures, specific comments, descriptions, and illustrations relate to the design and construction of bridges. The study identifies some outstanding books and design manuals on bridge aesthetics that recently have been developed and published by the engineering profession. It also lists a number of primary design guidelines that are recommended by many design authorities and suggests how these guidelines can be used to advantage by those with limited design experience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
De MirandaF.The Three Mentalities of Successful Bridge Design. In Bridge Aesthetics Around the World, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991.
2.
BurkeM. P.Jr.Bridge Design and the Bridge Aesthetics Bibliography. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 4, April 1989, pp. 883–899.
3.
YoungC. R.Aesthetics in Bridge Design (discussion and correspondence)Transactions, Canadian Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 25, 1911, pp. 277–288.
4.
TorrojaE.The Beauty of Structures. In Philosophy of Structures, University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1958, pp. 268–289.
5.
HoldenC.The Aesthetic Aspect of Civil Engineering Design (Second Lecture). In A Record of Six Lectures on the Aesthetic Aspect of Civil Engineering Design, The Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England, 1944.
6.
MunroT.Towards Science in Aesthetics.Liberal Arts Press, New York, N.Y., 1956.
7.
LeonhardtF.Developing Guidelines for Aesthetic Design. In Bridge Aesthetics Around the World, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991.
8.
BurkeM. P.Jr.Bridge Aesthetics: World View. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 121, No. 8, Aug. 1995, pp. 1252–1257.
9.
GlombJ.Aesthetic Aspects of Contemporary Bridge Design. In Bridge Aesthetics Around the World, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991.
