Abstract
Full-scale field tests to evaluate pipe-soil interaction during backfilling were conducted on the campus of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. The program consisted of 14 tests, with each test including concrete, plastic, and metal sections. In addition to pipe type, installation variables included in situ soil conditions, trench width, backfill material including controlled low-strength flowable material, haunching effort, and compaction methods. Test trenches were excavated under undisturbed in situ soil conditions. Eleven installations were conducted with 900-mm (inside diameter) pipe, and three installations were conducted with 1500-mm (inside diameter) pipe. Pipe and soil behavior was monitored during backfilling. Measurements included pipe shape, pipe strains, pipe-soil interface pressures, soil density, soil stresses, and soil strains. The pipes were buried to a cover depth of 1.2 m and were then excavated to inspect the pipe bedding and haunches. The results indicated significant variations in pipe behavior caused by installation practices. The rammer compactor produced greater backfill density than did the vibratory plate compactor with the same number of coverages and produced higher residual lateral soil stresses that contributed to better overall pipe performance during backfilling. The silty sand backfill tripled the peaking deflection during sidefill compaction compared with that with angular crushed rock backfill, but the former was more sensitive to deviations from good installation practice. Backfill compaction in the region from the spring line to 30 degrees below the spring line has a significant positive effect in mitigating poor bedding and haunching conditions. Pipe tests with controlled low-strength material for backfill performed very well.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.